Epistemic Disobedience and Grief in Academia

Drawing on conversations with foreign women in academic positions at one major University in Norway, this article is inspired by Barad’s and Haraway’s theorizing on how matter and discourse are mutually constituted through a diffractive approach. Understanding diffraction as an embodied engagement,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Carla C. Ramirez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-08-01
Series:Education Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/11/9/477
id doaj-5fff1df00d374adcb7ee872b30a282bc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5fff1df00d374adcb7ee872b30a282bc2021-09-26T00:01:40ZengMDPI AGEducation Sciences2227-71022021-08-011147747710.3390/educsci11090477Epistemic Disobedience and Grief in AcademiaCarla C. Ramirez0Department of Education and Lifelong Learning, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, NorwayDrawing on conversations with foreign women in academic positions at one major University in Norway, this article is inspired by Barad’s and Haraway’s theorizing on how matter and discourse are mutually constituted through a diffractive approach. Understanding diffraction as an embodied engagement, a becoming with the data through shared entanglements, this article argues that the researcher’s personal background cannot be separated from the data produced. Departing from the decolonial theorist Castro-Gómez concept ‘hubris of zero-point epistemology’, the existence of an abstract and transcendental western universalism, where ‘the observer observes without been observed’ (Domínguez 2020; Mignolo 2009), assemblages of foreign female academics are explored through posthuman feminism and decolonial perspectives (Jackson and Mazzei 2012; Taguchi 2012; Puwar 2004). Through immersion in assemblages of contradictions, strength, and resistance, this article contends that policymakers’ good intentions of diversity in higher education, and the existence of different bodies, are shaking the world of academia, albeit slowly. Academia is still immersed in zero-point epistemology, favoring western, upper-class, paternalist, and meritocratic thought, detached from academics’ embodied knowledge. This brings into existence ‘bodies out of place’, re/producing grief, resistance, and epistemic disobedience when some academics are not suitable of becoming real academics.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/11/9/477non-western women in academiaepistemic disobediencezero-point epistemology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carla C. Ramirez
spellingShingle Carla C. Ramirez
Epistemic Disobedience and Grief in Academia
Education Sciences
non-western women in academia
epistemic disobedience
zero-point epistemology
author_facet Carla C. Ramirez
author_sort Carla C. Ramirez
title Epistemic Disobedience and Grief in Academia
title_short Epistemic Disobedience and Grief in Academia
title_full Epistemic Disobedience and Grief in Academia
title_fullStr Epistemic Disobedience and Grief in Academia
title_full_unstemmed Epistemic Disobedience and Grief in Academia
title_sort epistemic disobedience and grief in academia
publisher MDPI AG
series Education Sciences
issn 2227-7102
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Drawing on conversations with foreign women in academic positions at one major University in Norway, this article is inspired by Barad’s and Haraway’s theorizing on how matter and discourse are mutually constituted through a diffractive approach. Understanding diffraction as an embodied engagement, a becoming with the data through shared entanglements, this article argues that the researcher’s personal background cannot be separated from the data produced. Departing from the decolonial theorist Castro-Gómez concept ‘hubris of zero-point epistemology’, the existence of an abstract and transcendental western universalism, where ‘the observer observes without been observed’ (Domínguez 2020; Mignolo 2009), assemblages of foreign female academics are explored through posthuman feminism and decolonial perspectives (Jackson and Mazzei 2012; Taguchi 2012; Puwar 2004). Through immersion in assemblages of contradictions, strength, and resistance, this article contends that policymakers’ good intentions of diversity in higher education, and the existence of different bodies, are shaking the world of academia, albeit slowly. Academia is still immersed in zero-point epistemology, favoring western, upper-class, paternalist, and meritocratic thought, detached from academics’ embodied knowledge. This brings into existence ‘bodies out of place’, re/producing grief, resistance, and epistemic disobedience when some academics are not suitable of becoming real academics.
topic non-western women in academia
epistemic disobedience
zero-point epistemology
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7102/11/9/477
work_keys_str_mv AT carlacramirez epistemicdisobedienceandgriefinacademia
_version_ 1717367294885101568