Adherence to a Vegetarian Diet and Diabetes Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
We quantitatively assessed the association between a vegetarian diet and diabetes risk using pooled estimates from observational studies. Electronic database searches for articles published from January 1980 to May 2016 were independently performed by two investigators, and 13 articles (14 studies)...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2017-06-01
|
Series: | Nutrients |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/9/6/603 |
id |
doaj-5ff821b514334209ac97d09bdec731e0 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5ff821b514334209ac97d09bdec731e02020-11-24T20:46:35ZengMDPI AGNutrients2072-66432017-06-019660310.3390/nu9060603nu9060603Adherence to a Vegetarian Diet and Diabetes Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational StudiesYujin Lee0Kyong Park1Department of Food and Nutrition, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Gyeongbuk, KoreaDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Gyeongbuk, KoreaWe quantitatively assessed the association between a vegetarian diet and diabetes risk using pooled estimates from observational studies. Electronic database searches for articles published from January 1980 to May 2016 were independently performed by two investigators, and 13 articles (14 studies) were identified. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for diabetes in vegetarians vs. non-vegetarians was 0.726 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.608, 0.867). In the subgroup analyses, this inverse association was stronger for the studies conducted in the Western Pacific region (OR 0.514, 95% CI: 0.304, 0.871) and Europe/North America (OR 0.756, 95% CI: 0.589, 0.971) than studies conducted in Southeast Asia (OR 0.888, 95% CI: 0.718, 1.099). No study had a substantial effect on the pooled effect size in the influence analysis, and the Egger’s (p = 0.465) and Begg’s tests (p = 0.584) revealed no publication bias. This meta-analysis indicates that a vegetarian diet is inversely associated with diabetes risk. Our results support the need for further investigations into the effects of the motivations for vegetarianism, the duration of the adherence to a vegetarian diet, and type of vegetarian on diabetes risk.http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/9/6/603vegetariandiabetessystematic reviewmeta-analysis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Yujin Lee Kyong Park |
spellingShingle |
Yujin Lee Kyong Park Adherence to a Vegetarian Diet and Diabetes Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies Nutrients vegetarian diabetes systematic review meta-analysis |
author_facet |
Yujin Lee Kyong Park |
author_sort |
Yujin Lee |
title |
Adherence to a Vegetarian Diet and Diabetes Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies |
title_short |
Adherence to a Vegetarian Diet and Diabetes Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies |
title_full |
Adherence to a Vegetarian Diet and Diabetes Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies |
title_fullStr |
Adherence to a Vegetarian Diet and Diabetes Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies |
title_full_unstemmed |
Adherence to a Vegetarian Diet and Diabetes Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies |
title_sort |
adherence to a vegetarian diet and diabetes risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Nutrients |
issn |
2072-6643 |
publishDate |
2017-06-01 |
description |
We quantitatively assessed the association between a vegetarian diet and diabetes risk using pooled estimates from observational studies. Electronic database searches for articles published from January 1980 to May 2016 were independently performed by two investigators, and 13 articles (14 studies) were identified. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for diabetes in vegetarians vs. non-vegetarians was 0.726 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.608, 0.867). In the subgroup analyses, this inverse association was stronger for the studies conducted in the Western Pacific region (OR 0.514, 95% CI: 0.304, 0.871) and Europe/North America (OR 0.756, 95% CI: 0.589, 0.971) than studies conducted in Southeast Asia (OR 0.888, 95% CI: 0.718, 1.099). No study had a substantial effect on the pooled effect size in the influence analysis, and the Egger’s (p = 0.465) and Begg’s tests (p = 0.584) revealed no publication bias. This meta-analysis indicates that a vegetarian diet is inversely associated with diabetes risk. Our results support the need for further investigations into the effects of the motivations for vegetarianism, the duration of the adherence to a vegetarian diet, and type of vegetarian on diabetes risk. |
topic |
vegetarian diabetes systematic review meta-analysis |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/9/6/603 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT yujinlee adherencetoavegetariandietanddiabetesriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofobservationalstudies AT kyongpark adherencetoavegetariandietanddiabetesriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofobservationalstudies |
_version_ |
1716812273513660416 |