Adherence to a Vegetarian Diet and Diabetes Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

We quantitatively assessed the association between a vegetarian diet and diabetes risk using pooled estimates from observational studies. Electronic database searches for articles published from January 1980 to May 2016 were independently performed by two investigators, and 13 articles (14 studies)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yujin Lee, Kyong Park
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-06-01
Series:Nutrients
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/9/6/603
id doaj-5ff821b514334209ac97d09bdec731e0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5ff821b514334209ac97d09bdec731e02020-11-24T20:46:35ZengMDPI AGNutrients2072-66432017-06-019660310.3390/nu9060603nu9060603Adherence to a Vegetarian Diet and Diabetes Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational StudiesYujin Lee0Kyong Park1Department of Food and Nutrition, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Gyeongbuk, KoreaDepartment of Food and Nutrition, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan 38541, Gyeongbuk, KoreaWe quantitatively assessed the association between a vegetarian diet and diabetes risk using pooled estimates from observational studies. Electronic database searches for articles published from January 1980 to May 2016 were independently performed by two investigators, and 13 articles (14 studies) were identified. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for diabetes in vegetarians vs. non-vegetarians was 0.726 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.608, 0.867). In the subgroup analyses, this inverse association was stronger for the studies conducted in the Western Pacific region (OR 0.514, 95% CI: 0.304, 0.871) and Europe/North America (OR 0.756, 95% CI: 0.589, 0.971) than studies conducted in Southeast Asia (OR 0.888, 95% CI: 0.718, 1.099). No study had a substantial effect on the pooled effect size in the influence analysis, and the Egger’s (p = 0.465) and Begg’s tests (p = 0.584) revealed no publication bias. This meta-analysis indicates that a vegetarian diet is inversely associated with diabetes risk. Our results support the need for further investigations into the effects of the motivations for vegetarianism, the duration of the adherence to a vegetarian diet, and type of vegetarian on diabetes risk.http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/9/6/603vegetariandiabetessystematic reviewmeta-analysis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yujin Lee
Kyong Park
spellingShingle Yujin Lee
Kyong Park
Adherence to a Vegetarian Diet and Diabetes Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
Nutrients
vegetarian
diabetes
systematic review
meta-analysis
author_facet Yujin Lee
Kyong Park
author_sort Yujin Lee
title Adherence to a Vegetarian Diet and Diabetes Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
title_short Adherence to a Vegetarian Diet and Diabetes Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
title_full Adherence to a Vegetarian Diet and Diabetes Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
title_fullStr Adherence to a Vegetarian Diet and Diabetes Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
title_full_unstemmed Adherence to a Vegetarian Diet and Diabetes Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies
title_sort adherence to a vegetarian diet and diabetes risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies
publisher MDPI AG
series Nutrients
issn 2072-6643
publishDate 2017-06-01
description We quantitatively assessed the association between a vegetarian diet and diabetes risk using pooled estimates from observational studies. Electronic database searches for articles published from January 1980 to May 2016 were independently performed by two investigators, and 13 articles (14 studies) were identified. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for diabetes in vegetarians vs. non-vegetarians was 0.726 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.608, 0.867). In the subgroup analyses, this inverse association was stronger for the studies conducted in the Western Pacific region (OR 0.514, 95% CI: 0.304, 0.871) and Europe/North America (OR 0.756, 95% CI: 0.589, 0.971) than studies conducted in Southeast Asia (OR 0.888, 95% CI: 0.718, 1.099). No study had a substantial effect on the pooled effect size in the influence analysis, and the Egger’s (p = 0.465) and Begg’s tests (p = 0.584) revealed no publication bias. This meta-analysis indicates that a vegetarian diet is inversely associated with diabetes risk. Our results support the need for further investigations into the effects of the motivations for vegetarianism, the duration of the adherence to a vegetarian diet, and type of vegetarian on diabetes risk.
topic vegetarian
diabetes
systematic review
meta-analysis
url http://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/9/6/603
work_keys_str_mv AT yujinlee adherencetoavegetariandietanddiabetesriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofobservationalstudies
AT kyongpark adherencetoavegetariandietanddiabetesriskasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofobservationalstudies
_version_ 1716812273513660416