Evolution of opinions on social networks in the presence of competing committed groups.
Public opinion is often affected by the presence of committed groups of individuals dedicated to competing points of view. Using a model of pairwise social influence, we study how the presence of such groups within social networks affects the outcome and the speed of evolution of the overall opinion...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2012-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3308977?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-5ff2538dceec47b283a322e5d2878b00 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5ff2538dceec47b283a322e5d2878b002020-11-25T01:11:59ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0173e3321510.1371/journal.pone.0033215Evolution of opinions on social networks in the presence of competing committed groups.Jierui XieJeffrey EmenheiserMatthew KirbySameet SreenivasanBoleslaw K SzymanskiGyorgy KornissPublic opinion is often affected by the presence of committed groups of individuals dedicated to competing points of view. Using a model of pairwise social influence, we study how the presence of such groups within social networks affects the outcome and the speed of evolution of the overall opinion on the network. Earlier work indicated that a single committed group within a dense social network can cause the entire network to quickly adopt the group's opinion (in times scaling logarithmically with the network size), so long as the committed group constitutes more than about 10% of the population (with the findings being qualitatively similar for sparse networks as well). Here we study the more general case of opinion evolution when two groups committed to distinct, competing opinions A and B, and constituting fractions pA and pB of the total population respectively, are present in the network. We show for stylized social networks (including Erdös-Rényi random graphs and Barabási-Albert scale-free networks) that the phase diagram of this system in parameter space (pA,pB) consists of two regions, one where two stable steady-states coexist, and the remaining where only a single stable steady-state exists. These two regions are separated by two fold-bifurcation (spinodal) lines which meet tangentially and terminate at a cusp (critical point). We provide further insights to the phase diagram and to the nature of the underlying phase transitions by investigating the model on infinite (mean-field limit), finite complete graphs and finite sparse networks. For the latter case, we also derive the scaling exponent associated with the exponential growth of switching times as a function of the distance from the critical point.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3308977?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jierui Xie Jeffrey Emenheiser Matthew Kirby Sameet Sreenivasan Boleslaw K Szymanski Gyorgy Korniss |
spellingShingle |
Jierui Xie Jeffrey Emenheiser Matthew Kirby Sameet Sreenivasan Boleslaw K Szymanski Gyorgy Korniss Evolution of opinions on social networks in the presence of competing committed groups. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Jierui Xie Jeffrey Emenheiser Matthew Kirby Sameet Sreenivasan Boleslaw K Szymanski Gyorgy Korniss |
author_sort |
Jierui Xie |
title |
Evolution of opinions on social networks in the presence of competing committed groups. |
title_short |
Evolution of opinions on social networks in the presence of competing committed groups. |
title_full |
Evolution of opinions on social networks in the presence of competing committed groups. |
title_fullStr |
Evolution of opinions on social networks in the presence of competing committed groups. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evolution of opinions on social networks in the presence of competing committed groups. |
title_sort |
evolution of opinions on social networks in the presence of competing committed groups. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2012-01-01 |
description |
Public opinion is often affected by the presence of committed groups of individuals dedicated to competing points of view. Using a model of pairwise social influence, we study how the presence of such groups within social networks affects the outcome and the speed of evolution of the overall opinion on the network. Earlier work indicated that a single committed group within a dense social network can cause the entire network to quickly adopt the group's opinion (in times scaling logarithmically with the network size), so long as the committed group constitutes more than about 10% of the population (with the findings being qualitatively similar for sparse networks as well). Here we study the more general case of opinion evolution when two groups committed to distinct, competing opinions A and B, and constituting fractions pA and pB of the total population respectively, are present in the network. We show for stylized social networks (including Erdös-Rényi random graphs and Barabási-Albert scale-free networks) that the phase diagram of this system in parameter space (pA,pB) consists of two regions, one where two stable steady-states coexist, and the remaining where only a single stable steady-state exists. These two regions are separated by two fold-bifurcation (spinodal) lines which meet tangentially and terminate at a cusp (critical point). We provide further insights to the phase diagram and to the nature of the underlying phase transitions by investigating the model on infinite (mean-field limit), finite complete graphs and finite sparse networks. For the latter case, we also derive the scaling exponent associated with the exponential growth of switching times as a function of the distance from the critical point. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3308977?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT jieruixie evolutionofopinionsonsocialnetworksinthepresenceofcompetingcommittedgroups AT jeffreyemenheiser evolutionofopinionsonsocialnetworksinthepresenceofcompetingcommittedgroups AT matthewkirby evolutionofopinionsonsocialnetworksinthepresenceofcompetingcommittedgroups AT sameetsreenivasan evolutionofopinionsonsocialnetworksinthepresenceofcompetingcommittedgroups AT boleslawkszymanski evolutionofopinionsonsocialnetworksinthepresenceofcompetingcommittedgroups AT gyorgykorniss evolutionofopinionsonsocialnetworksinthepresenceofcompetingcommittedgroups |
_version_ |
1725168351996542976 |