Evolution of opinions on social networks in the presence of competing committed groups.

Public opinion is often affected by the presence of committed groups of individuals dedicated to competing points of view. Using a model of pairwise social influence, we study how the presence of such groups within social networks affects the outcome and the speed of evolution of the overall opinion...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jierui Xie, Jeffrey Emenheiser, Matthew Kirby, Sameet Sreenivasan, Boleslaw K Szymanski, Gyorgy Korniss
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2012-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3308977?pdf=render
id doaj-5ff2538dceec47b283a322e5d2878b00
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5ff2538dceec47b283a322e5d2878b002020-11-25T01:11:59ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0173e3321510.1371/journal.pone.0033215Evolution of opinions on social networks in the presence of competing committed groups.Jierui XieJeffrey EmenheiserMatthew KirbySameet SreenivasanBoleslaw K SzymanskiGyorgy KornissPublic opinion is often affected by the presence of committed groups of individuals dedicated to competing points of view. Using a model of pairwise social influence, we study how the presence of such groups within social networks affects the outcome and the speed of evolution of the overall opinion on the network. Earlier work indicated that a single committed group within a dense social network can cause the entire network to quickly adopt the group's opinion (in times scaling logarithmically with the network size), so long as the committed group constitutes more than about 10% of the population (with the findings being qualitatively similar for sparse networks as well). Here we study the more general case of opinion evolution when two groups committed to distinct, competing opinions A and B, and constituting fractions pA and pB of the total population respectively, are present in the network. We show for stylized social networks (including Erdös-Rényi random graphs and Barabási-Albert scale-free networks) that the phase diagram of this system in parameter space (pA,pB) consists of two regions, one where two stable steady-states coexist, and the remaining where only a single stable steady-state exists. These two regions are separated by two fold-bifurcation (spinodal) lines which meet tangentially and terminate at a cusp (critical point). We provide further insights to the phase diagram and to the nature of the underlying phase transitions by investigating the model on infinite (mean-field limit), finite complete graphs and finite sparse networks. For the latter case, we also derive the scaling exponent associated with the exponential growth of switching times as a function of the distance from the critical point.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3308977?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jierui Xie
Jeffrey Emenheiser
Matthew Kirby
Sameet Sreenivasan
Boleslaw K Szymanski
Gyorgy Korniss
spellingShingle Jierui Xie
Jeffrey Emenheiser
Matthew Kirby
Sameet Sreenivasan
Boleslaw K Szymanski
Gyorgy Korniss
Evolution of opinions on social networks in the presence of competing committed groups.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Jierui Xie
Jeffrey Emenheiser
Matthew Kirby
Sameet Sreenivasan
Boleslaw K Szymanski
Gyorgy Korniss
author_sort Jierui Xie
title Evolution of opinions on social networks in the presence of competing committed groups.
title_short Evolution of opinions on social networks in the presence of competing committed groups.
title_full Evolution of opinions on social networks in the presence of competing committed groups.
title_fullStr Evolution of opinions on social networks in the presence of competing committed groups.
title_full_unstemmed Evolution of opinions on social networks in the presence of competing committed groups.
title_sort evolution of opinions on social networks in the presence of competing committed groups.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Public opinion is often affected by the presence of committed groups of individuals dedicated to competing points of view. Using a model of pairwise social influence, we study how the presence of such groups within social networks affects the outcome and the speed of evolution of the overall opinion on the network. Earlier work indicated that a single committed group within a dense social network can cause the entire network to quickly adopt the group's opinion (in times scaling logarithmically with the network size), so long as the committed group constitutes more than about 10% of the population (with the findings being qualitatively similar for sparse networks as well). Here we study the more general case of opinion evolution when two groups committed to distinct, competing opinions A and B, and constituting fractions pA and pB of the total population respectively, are present in the network. We show for stylized social networks (including Erdös-Rényi random graphs and Barabási-Albert scale-free networks) that the phase diagram of this system in parameter space (pA,pB) consists of two regions, one where two stable steady-states coexist, and the remaining where only a single stable steady-state exists. These two regions are separated by two fold-bifurcation (spinodal) lines which meet tangentially and terminate at a cusp (critical point). We provide further insights to the phase diagram and to the nature of the underlying phase transitions by investigating the model on infinite (mean-field limit), finite complete graphs and finite sparse networks. For the latter case, we also derive the scaling exponent associated with the exponential growth of switching times as a function of the distance from the critical point.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3308977?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT jieruixie evolutionofopinionsonsocialnetworksinthepresenceofcompetingcommittedgroups
AT jeffreyemenheiser evolutionofopinionsonsocialnetworksinthepresenceofcompetingcommittedgroups
AT matthewkirby evolutionofopinionsonsocialnetworksinthepresenceofcompetingcommittedgroups
AT sameetsreenivasan evolutionofopinionsonsocialnetworksinthepresenceofcompetingcommittedgroups
AT boleslawkszymanski evolutionofopinionsonsocialnetworksinthepresenceofcompetingcommittedgroups
AT gyorgykorniss evolutionofopinionsonsocialnetworksinthepresenceofcompetingcommittedgroups
_version_ 1725168351996542976