Developmental Deffects of Enamel in Children with Intellectual Disability

Objectives: To investigate the frequency of developmental defects of enamel (DDE) in children with intellectual disability. Subjects and methods: Children aged 5–18 years (72 children with intellectual disabilities and 72 controls) were included in the study. All the teeth were screened for develo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Vesna Erika MODRIĆ, Zoran Karlović, Željko Verzak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Zagreb. School of Dental Medicine 2016-01-01
Series:Acta Stomatologica Croatica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/227485
id doaj-5fda2ce7287044f0a223e1db1360db35
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5fda2ce7287044f0a223e1db1360db352020-11-25T01:06:06ZengUniversity of Zagreb. School of Dental MedicineActa Stomatologica Croatica0001-70191846-04102016-01-015016571Developmental Deffects of Enamel in Children with Intellectual DisabilityVesna Erika MODRIĆ0Zoran Karlović1Željko Verzak2Dental Polyclinic Zagreb, Zagreb, CroatiaSchool of Dental Medicine University of Zagreb, Zagreb, CroatiaSchool of Dental Medicine University of Zagreb, Zagreb, CroatiaObjectives: To investigate the frequency of developmental defects of enamel (DDE) in children with intellectual disability. Subjects and methods: Children aged 5–18 years (72 children with intellectual disabilities and 72 controls) were included in the study. All the teeth were screened for developmental defects of enamel using the modified Developmental defects of enamel (mDDE) index. Results: Out of the 72 children with intellectual disabilities in this study, 20 (27.78%) presented dental defects of enamel, compared with 8 (11.11%) of those in the control group, which was considered statistically significant (p = 0.021). The majority of children in both groups had white demarcated opacities. Children in both groups were more likely to have maxillary teeth affected than the mandibular teeth and the asymmetrical demarcated enamel defects were more common than the symmetric ones. Majority of opacities in children in both groups were on the maxillary incisors. Conclusions: Children with intellectual disabilities have more developmental defects of enamel than children in the control group. Enamel defects increase caries risk and cause reduction in enamel mechanical properties leading to restoration failures.http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/227485Intellectual DisabilityChildDental Enamel
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Vesna Erika MODRIĆ
Zoran Karlović
Željko Verzak
spellingShingle Vesna Erika MODRIĆ
Zoran Karlović
Željko Verzak
Developmental Deffects of Enamel in Children with Intellectual Disability
Acta Stomatologica Croatica
Intellectual Disability
Child
Dental Enamel
author_facet Vesna Erika MODRIĆ
Zoran Karlović
Željko Verzak
author_sort Vesna Erika MODRIĆ
title Developmental Deffects of Enamel in Children with Intellectual Disability
title_short Developmental Deffects of Enamel in Children with Intellectual Disability
title_full Developmental Deffects of Enamel in Children with Intellectual Disability
title_fullStr Developmental Deffects of Enamel in Children with Intellectual Disability
title_full_unstemmed Developmental Deffects of Enamel in Children with Intellectual Disability
title_sort developmental deffects of enamel in children with intellectual disability
publisher University of Zagreb. School of Dental Medicine
series Acta Stomatologica Croatica
issn 0001-7019
1846-0410
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Objectives: To investigate the frequency of developmental defects of enamel (DDE) in children with intellectual disability. Subjects and methods: Children aged 5–18 years (72 children with intellectual disabilities and 72 controls) were included in the study. All the teeth were screened for developmental defects of enamel using the modified Developmental defects of enamel (mDDE) index. Results: Out of the 72 children with intellectual disabilities in this study, 20 (27.78%) presented dental defects of enamel, compared with 8 (11.11%) of those in the control group, which was considered statistically significant (p = 0.021). The majority of children in both groups had white demarcated opacities. Children in both groups were more likely to have maxillary teeth affected than the mandibular teeth and the asymmetrical demarcated enamel defects were more common than the symmetric ones. Majority of opacities in children in both groups were on the maxillary incisors. Conclusions: Children with intellectual disabilities have more developmental defects of enamel than children in the control group. Enamel defects increase caries risk and cause reduction in enamel mechanical properties leading to restoration failures.
topic Intellectual Disability
Child
Dental Enamel
url http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/227485
work_keys_str_mv AT vesnaerikamodric developmentaldeffectsofenamelinchildrenwithintellectualdisability
AT zorankarlovic developmentaldeffectsofenamelinchildrenwithintellectualdisability
AT zeljkoverzak developmentaldeffectsofenamelinchildrenwithintellectualdisability
_version_ 1725191460411670528