Ein blinder Fleck der Diversitätsdebatte? Zur <i>Neuguineaisierung</i> der Stadt
<p>The contemporary metropolis is characterised by an increasing diversity of its population, which is called “super-diversity” or “hyperdiversity” in the urban discourse. This epistemological realignment breaks new ground away from the classic Chicago School. Associated with this “diversifica...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2020-07-01
|
Series: | Geographica Helvetica |
Online Access: | https://gh.copernicus.org/articles/75/209/2020/gh-75-209-2020.pdf |
id |
doaj-5fa1133817cc4d0ea085a92a52c493db |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5fa1133817cc4d0ea085a92a52c493db2020-11-25T03:04:26ZdeuCopernicus PublicationsGeographica Helvetica0016-73122194-87982020-07-017520921310.5194/gh-75-209-2020Ein blinder Fleck der Diversitätsdebatte? Zur <i>Neuguineaisierung</i> der StadtP. Dirksmeier<p>The contemporary metropolis is characterised by an increasing diversity of its population, which is called “super-diversity” or “hyperdiversity” in the urban discourse. This epistemological realignment breaks new ground away from the classic Chicago School. Associated with this “diversification of diversity” (Vertovec, 2007:1025) is a fragmentation of the different social and ethnic groups in the city. However, the concept of super-diversity camouflages a separateness of these groups that is called <i>newguineaisation</i> in this paper. With that said, this new urban reality claims for empirical investigations of the societal implication of this phenomenon especially with regard to social cohesion in contemporary cities.</p>https://gh.copernicus.org/articles/75/209/2020/gh-75-209-2020.pdf |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
deu |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
P. Dirksmeier |
spellingShingle |
P. Dirksmeier Ein blinder Fleck der Diversitätsdebatte? Zur <i>Neuguineaisierung</i> der Stadt Geographica Helvetica |
author_facet |
P. Dirksmeier |
author_sort |
P. Dirksmeier |
title |
Ein blinder Fleck der Diversitätsdebatte? Zur <i>Neuguineaisierung</i> der Stadt |
title_short |
Ein blinder Fleck der Diversitätsdebatte? Zur <i>Neuguineaisierung</i> der Stadt |
title_full |
Ein blinder Fleck der Diversitätsdebatte? Zur <i>Neuguineaisierung</i> der Stadt |
title_fullStr |
Ein blinder Fleck der Diversitätsdebatte? Zur <i>Neuguineaisierung</i> der Stadt |
title_full_unstemmed |
Ein blinder Fleck der Diversitätsdebatte? Zur <i>Neuguineaisierung</i> der Stadt |
title_sort |
ein blinder fleck der diversitätsdebatte? zur <i>neuguineaisierung</i> der stadt |
publisher |
Copernicus Publications |
series |
Geographica Helvetica |
issn |
0016-7312 2194-8798 |
publishDate |
2020-07-01 |
description |
<p>The contemporary metropolis is characterised by an
increasing diversity of its population, which is called “super-diversity” or “hyperdiversity” in the urban discourse.
This epistemological realignment breaks new ground away from the classic
Chicago School. Associated with this “diversification of diversity”
(Vertovec, 2007:1025) is a fragmentation of the different social and ethnic
groups in the city. However, the concept of super-diversity camouflages a
separateness of these groups that is called <i>newguineaisation</i> in this paper. With that said,
this new urban reality claims for empirical investigations of the societal
implication of this phenomenon especially with regard to social cohesion in
contemporary cities.</p> |
url |
https://gh.copernicus.org/articles/75/209/2020/gh-75-209-2020.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT pdirksmeier einblinderfleckderdiversitatsdebattezurineuguineaisierungiderstadt |
_version_ |
1724681888824557568 |