Ein blinder Fleck der Diversitätsdebatte? Zur <i>Neuguineaisierung</i> der Stadt
<p>The contemporary metropolis is characterised by an increasing diversity of its population, which is called “super-diversity” or “hyperdiversity” in the urban discourse. This epistemological realignment breaks new ground away from the classic Chicago School. Associated with this “diversifica...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | deu |
| Published: |
Copernicus Publications
2020-07-01
|
| Series: | Geographica Helvetica |
| Online Access: | https://gh.copernicus.org/articles/75/209/2020/gh-75-209-2020.pdf |
| Summary: | <p>The contemporary metropolis is characterised by an
increasing diversity of its population, which is called “super-diversity” or “hyperdiversity” in the urban discourse.
This epistemological realignment breaks new ground away from the classic
Chicago School. Associated with this “diversification of diversity”
(Vertovec, 2007:1025) is a fragmentation of the different social and ethnic
groups in the city. However, the concept of super-diversity camouflages a
separateness of these groups that is called <i>newguineaisation</i> in this paper. With that said,
this new urban reality claims for empirical investigations of the societal
implication of this phenomenon especially with regard to social cohesion in
contemporary cities.</p> |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0016-7312 2194-8798 |