Assessment of the Glenoid Morphology Based on Demographic Data in the Turkish Population

Purpose. In this study, our aim was to evaluate the glenoid version, height, and width measurements based on gender, side, age, height, and hand dominance in the Turkish population using computed tomography (CT) images. Methods. In our study, CT images of 140 patients (62 females and 78 males; mean...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Abdulkadir Sarı, Yaşar Mahsut Dinçel, Burak Günaydın, Mehmet Ümit Çetin, Ömer Özçaglayan, Kerem Bilsel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2020-01-01
Series:BioMed Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5736136
id doaj-5fa0a147620c44bb9ec2a785f2daf92d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5fa0a147620c44bb9ec2a785f2daf92d2020-11-25T02:39:51ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412020-01-01202010.1155/2020/57361365736136Assessment of the Glenoid Morphology Based on Demographic Data in the Turkish PopulationAbdulkadir Sarı0Yaşar Mahsut Dinçel1Burak Günaydın2Mehmet Ümit Çetin3Ömer Özçaglayan4Kerem Bilsel5Namık Kemal University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Tekirdağ, TurkeyNamık Kemal University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Tekirdağ, TurkeyNamık Kemal University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Tekirdağ, TurkeyNamık Kemal University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Tekirdağ, TurkeyNamık Kemal University, School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Tekirdağ, TurkeyBezmialem Vakıf University School of Medicine, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Istanbul, TurkeyPurpose. In this study, our aim was to evaluate the glenoid version, height, and width measurements based on gender, side, age, height, and hand dominance in the Turkish population using computed tomography (CT) images. Methods. In our study, CT images of 140 patients (62 females and 78 males; mean age: 39.6 years) who had no shoulder complaints were evaluated retrospectively. Glenoid version (GV), AP diameter (width), and SI diameter (height) on both shoulders were measured on the CT images. Correlations between patient gender, side, age, height, and hand dominance and the GV and size were evaluated. Results. The right shoulder had a mean GV of −0.93 ± 7.80 degrees and the left shoulder had a GV of −0.88 ± 6.63 degrees (p>0.05). The mean AP diameter of the glenoid was 26.57 ± 3.02 mm in the right shoulder and 26.33 ± 3.01 mm in the left shoulder (p>0.05). The mean SI diameter of the glenoid was 31.8 ± 3.6 mm in the right and 31.7 ± 3.3 mm in the left shoulder (p>0.05). When men and women were evaluated in two separate groups, the GV, AP, and SI values did not exhibit a statistically significant difference between the two shoulders in both genders (p>0.05). There was a positive correlation between the ages and heights of the patients and the glenoid size (p<0.05). The mean AP diameter was approximately 28 mm and the SI diameter was 34 mm in males, whereas the mean AP diameter was 24 mm and the SI diameter was 30 mm in females (p<0.05). The GV values of the dominant shoulders were significantly more retroverted (p<0.05). There was a positive correlation between the ages and heights of the patients and the glenoid size (p<0.05). Conclusion. Hand dominance had an effect on the glenoid version, while patient gender, age, and height had an effect on the glenoid size. The glenoid width in the Turkish population was similar to that of the European and American populations, and the glenoid height was similar to that of the Asian population. Our GV values were similar to those of the Asian population and more anteverted compared to the Western population. We believe that our findings will be useful in preoperative planning and in the production of implants for our population.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5736136
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Abdulkadir Sarı
Yaşar Mahsut Dinçel
Burak Günaydın
Mehmet Ümit Çetin
Ömer Özçaglayan
Kerem Bilsel
spellingShingle Abdulkadir Sarı
Yaşar Mahsut Dinçel
Burak Günaydın
Mehmet Ümit Çetin
Ömer Özçaglayan
Kerem Bilsel
Assessment of the Glenoid Morphology Based on Demographic Data in the Turkish Population
BioMed Research International
author_facet Abdulkadir Sarı
Yaşar Mahsut Dinçel
Burak Günaydın
Mehmet Ümit Çetin
Ömer Özçaglayan
Kerem Bilsel
author_sort Abdulkadir Sarı
title Assessment of the Glenoid Morphology Based on Demographic Data in the Turkish Population
title_short Assessment of the Glenoid Morphology Based on Demographic Data in the Turkish Population
title_full Assessment of the Glenoid Morphology Based on Demographic Data in the Turkish Population
title_fullStr Assessment of the Glenoid Morphology Based on Demographic Data in the Turkish Population
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of the Glenoid Morphology Based on Demographic Data in the Turkish Population
title_sort assessment of the glenoid morphology based on demographic data in the turkish population
publisher Hindawi Limited
series BioMed Research International
issn 2314-6133
2314-6141
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Purpose. In this study, our aim was to evaluate the glenoid version, height, and width measurements based on gender, side, age, height, and hand dominance in the Turkish population using computed tomography (CT) images. Methods. In our study, CT images of 140 patients (62 females and 78 males; mean age: 39.6 years) who had no shoulder complaints were evaluated retrospectively. Glenoid version (GV), AP diameter (width), and SI diameter (height) on both shoulders were measured on the CT images. Correlations between patient gender, side, age, height, and hand dominance and the GV and size were evaluated. Results. The right shoulder had a mean GV of −0.93 ± 7.80 degrees and the left shoulder had a GV of −0.88 ± 6.63 degrees (p>0.05). The mean AP diameter of the glenoid was 26.57 ± 3.02 mm in the right shoulder and 26.33 ± 3.01 mm in the left shoulder (p>0.05). The mean SI diameter of the glenoid was 31.8 ± 3.6 mm in the right and 31.7 ± 3.3 mm in the left shoulder (p>0.05). When men and women were evaluated in two separate groups, the GV, AP, and SI values did not exhibit a statistically significant difference between the two shoulders in both genders (p>0.05). There was a positive correlation between the ages and heights of the patients and the glenoid size (p<0.05). The mean AP diameter was approximately 28 mm and the SI diameter was 34 mm in males, whereas the mean AP diameter was 24 mm and the SI diameter was 30 mm in females (p<0.05). The GV values of the dominant shoulders were significantly more retroverted (p<0.05). There was a positive correlation between the ages and heights of the patients and the glenoid size (p<0.05). Conclusion. Hand dominance had an effect on the glenoid version, while patient gender, age, and height had an effect on the glenoid size. The glenoid width in the Turkish population was similar to that of the European and American populations, and the glenoid height was similar to that of the Asian population. Our GV values were similar to those of the Asian population and more anteverted compared to the Western population. We believe that our findings will be useful in preoperative planning and in the production of implants for our population.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/5736136
work_keys_str_mv AT abdulkadirsarı assessmentoftheglenoidmorphologybasedondemographicdataintheturkishpopulation
AT yasarmahsutdincel assessmentoftheglenoidmorphologybasedondemographicdataintheturkishpopulation
AT burakgunaydın assessmentoftheglenoidmorphologybasedondemographicdataintheturkishpopulation
AT mehmetumitcetin assessmentoftheglenoidmorphologybasedondemographicdataintheturkishpopulation
AT omerozcaglayan assessmentoftheglenoidmorphologybasedondemographicdataintheturkishpopulation
AT kerembilsel assessmentoftheglenoidmorphologybasedondemographicdataintheturkishpopulation
_version_ 1715421334320709632