Intravenous pacemaker lead implantation for a pediatric patient: A 16-year follow-up study

Intravenous pacemaker lead implantation for small children is not performed routinely. Here, we report the case of a pediatric patient who underwent endocardial lead implantation and follow-up for 16 years. The patient was a 4-year-old boy who underwent total correction of pulmonary atresia with ven...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Susumu Nakamoto, Kosuke Fujii, Takako Nishino, Takuma Satus, Tatsuya Ogawa, Toshio Kaneda, Toshihiko Saga
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2013-10-01
Series:Journal of Arrhythmia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S188042761300046X
id doaj-5f975d155f454aadb7e1506acde644e1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5f975d155f454aadb7e1506acde644e12020-11-24T21:20:11ZengWileyJournal of Arrhythmia1880-42762013-10-0129528729010.1016/j.joa.2013.02.004Intravenous pacemaker lead implantation for a pediatric patient: A 16-year follow-up studySusumu NakamotoKosuke FujiiTakako NishinoTakuma SatusTatsuya OgawaToshio KanedaToshihiko SagaIntravenous pacemaker lead implantation for small children is not performed routinely. Here, we report the case of a pediatric patient who underwent endocardial lead implantation and follow-up for 16 years. The patient was a 4-year-old boy who underwent total correction of pulmonary atresia with ventricular septal defect following several palliative operations. After the patient underwent total correction, atrial flutter was noted. Atrial flutter was successfully terminated by overdrive pacing. However, atrial flutter occurred again immediately after overdrive pacing. To treat atrial flutter caused by sick sinus syndrome, a screw-in type lead was attached to the free wall of the right atrium and an excess loop was left to allow for the patient's growth. During the 16-year follow-up, no adverse effects were observed except for a gradual increase in pacing threshold. The selection of a small-sized endocardial lead and an appropriate entry vein, with meticulous management of the leads, makes implantation of an endocardial lead for small children easier and safer.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S188042761300046XIntravenous pacemaker lead implantationChildScrew-in lead
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Susumu Nakamoto
Kosuke Fujii
Takako Nishino
Takuma Satus
Tatsuya Ogawa
Toshio Kaneda
Toshihiko Saga
spellingShingle Susumu Nakamoto
Kosuke Fujii
Takako Nishino
Takuma Satus
Tatsuya Ogawa
Toshio Kaneda
Toshihiko Saga
Intravenous pacemaker lead implantation for a pediatric patient: A 16-year follow-up study
Journal of Arrhythmia
Intravenous pacemaker lead implantation
Child
Screw-in lead
author_facet Susumu Nakamoto
Kosuke Fujii
Takako Nishino
Takuma Satus
Tatsuya Ogawa
Toshio Kaneda
Toshihiko Saga
author_sort Susumu Nakamoto
title Intravenous pacemaker lead implantation for a pediatric patient: A 16-year follow-up study
title_short Intravenous pacemaker lead implantation for a pediatric patient: A 16-year follow-up study
title_full Intravenous pacemaker lead implantation for a pediatric patient: A 16-year follow-up study
title_fullStr Intravenous pacemaker lead implantation for a pediatric patient: A 16-year follow-up study
title_full_unstemmed Intravenous pacemaker lead implantation for a pediatric patient: A 16-year follow-up study
title_sort intravenous pacemaker lead implantation for a pediatric patient: a 16-year follow-up study
publisher Wiley
series Journal of Arrhythmia
issn 1880-4276
publishDate 2013-10-01
description Intravenous pacemaker lead implantation for small children is not performed routinely. Here, we report the case of a pediatric patient who underwent endocardial lead implantation and follow-up for 16 years. The patient was a 4-year-old boy who underwent total correction of pulmonary atresia with ventricular septal defect following several palliative operations. After the patient underwent total correction, atrial flutter was noted. Atrial flutter was successfully terminated by overdrive pacing. However, atrial flutter occurred again immediately after overdrive pacing. To treat atrial flutter caused by sick sinus syndrome, a screw-in type lead was attached to the free wall of the right atrium and an excess loop was left to allow for the patient's growth. During the 16-year follow-up, no adverse effects were observed except for a gradual increase in pacing threshold. The selection of a small-sized endocardial lead and an appropriate entry vein, with meticulous management of the leads, makes implantation of an endocardial lead for small children easier and safer.
topic Intravenous pacemaker lead implantation
Child
Screw-in lead
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S188042761300046X
work_keys_str_mv AT susumunakamoto intravenouspacemakerleadimplantationforapediatricpatienta16yearfollowupstudy
AT kosukefujii intravenouspacemakerleadimplantationforapediatricpatienta16yearfollowupstudy
AT takakonishino intravenouspacemakerleadimplantationforapediatricpatienta16yearfollowupstudy
AT takumasatus intravenouspacemakerleadimplantationforapediatricpatienta16yearfollowupstudy
AT tatsuyaogawa intravenouspacemakerleadimplantationforapediatricpatienta16yearfollowupstudy
AT toshiokaneda intravenouspacemakerleadimplantationforapediatricpatienta16yearfollowupstudy
AT toshihikosaga intravenouspacemakerleadimplantationforapediatricpatienta16yearfollowupstudy
_version_ 1726003508223672320