Effectiveness Of Selective Non-Operative Treatment In Penetrating Abdominal Injuries

Aim: As a result of improvements in resuscitation and surgical techniques, advances in antibiotic treatment and development of monitoring equipments, selective non-operative treatment (SNOT) has emerged as an important development in the management of penetrating abdominal injuries. If patients...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tamer Karşıdağ, Sefa Tüzün
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Galenos Yayinevi 2012-09-01
Series:Haseki Tıp Bülteni
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.hasekidergisi.com/article_4667/Effectiveness-Of-Selective-Non-operative-Treatment-In-Penetrating-Abdominal-Injuries
id doaj-5f919cd5595d460f8db7af0f59e3e64b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5f919cd5595d460f8db7af0f59e3e64b2020-11-25T03:43:22ZengGalenos YayineviHaseki Tıp Bülteni1302-00722147-26882012-09-01 5038188Effectiveness Of Selective Non-Operative Treatment In Penetrating Abdominal InjuriesTamer Karşıdağ0Sefa Tüzün1Sağlık Bakanlığı Haseki Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Genel Cerrahi Kliniği, İstanbul, TürkiyeSağlık Bakanlığı Haseki Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Genel Cerrahi Kliniği, İstanbul, TürkiyeAim: As a result of improvements in resuscitation and surgical techniques, advances in antibiotic treatment and development of monitoring equipments, selective non-operative treatment (SNOT) has emerged as an important development in the management of penetrating abdominal injuries. If patients do not need the operation, the ability to treat them without surgical intervention is not only scientifically correct but also necessary in terms of ethics. Methods: During the study period, hemodynamically stable 133 patients with penetrating injuries to the anterior and posterior abdomen and without indication for laparotomy were followed and treated with SNOT. Results: There were 122 men and 11 women. The mean age was 28,9 years (range: 14-60 years). Based on clinical observation, laparotomy was performed in 16 patients (12%). The remaining patients were clinically monitored without any surgical intervention. Mortality and major complication rate was zero in all groups. Patients treated nonoperatively had a significantly shorter hospital stay (1.8 days) than patients treated operatively (5,2 days) (p=0.0003). In one case, we found no significant organ injury during surgery in the laparotomy group. Conclusion: SNOT of penetrating abdominal injuries has a high success rate. (The Me di cal Bul le tin of Ha se ki 2012; 50: 81-8)http://www.hasekidergisi.com/article_4667/Effectiveness-Of-Selective-Non-operative-Treatment-In-Penetrating-Abdominal-InjuriesPenetrating abdominal injuryNon-operative treatment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tamer Karşıdağ
Sefa Tüzün
spellingShingle Tamer Karşıdağ
Sefa Tüzün
Effectiveness Of Selective Non-Operative Treatment In Penetrating Abdominal Injuries
Haseki Tıp Bülteni
Penetrating abdominal injury
Non-operative treatment
author_facet Tamer Karşıdağ
Sefa Tüzün
author_sort Tamer Karşıdağ
title Effectiveness Of Selective Non-Operative Treatment In Penetrating Abdominal Injuries
title_short Effectiveness Of Selective Non-Operative Treatment In Penetrating Abdominal Injuries
title_full Effectiveness Of Selective Non-Operative Treatment In Penetrating Abdominal Injuries
title_fullStr Effectiveness Of Selective Non-Operative Treatment In Penetrating Abdominal Injuries
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness Of Selective Non-Operative Treatment In Penetrating Abdominal Injuries
title_sort effectiveness of selective non-operative treatment in penetrating abdominal injuries
publisher Galenos Yayinevi
series Haseki Tıp Bülteni
issn 1302-0072
2147-2688
publishDate 2012-09-01
description Aim: As a result of improvements in resuscitation and surgical techniques, advances in antibiotic treatment and development of monitoring equipments, selective non-operative treatment (SNOT) has emerged as an important development in the management of penetrating abdominal injuries. If patients do not need the operation, the ability to treat them without surgical intervention is not only scientifically correct but also necessary in terms of ethics. Methods: During the study period, hemodynamically stable 133 patients with penetrating injuries to the anterior and posterior abdomen and without indication for laparotomy were followed and treated with SNOT. Results: There were 122 men and 11 women. The mean age was 28,9 years (range: 14-60 years). Based on clinical observation, laparotomy was performed in 16 patients (12%). The remaining patients were clinically monitored without any surgical intervention. Mortality and major complication rate was zero in all groups. Patients treated nonoperatively had a significantly shorter hospital stay (1.8 days) than patients treated operatively (5,2 days) (p=0.0003). In one case, we found no significant organ injury during surgery in the laparotomy group. Conclusion: SNOT of penetrating abdominal injuries has a high success rate. (The Me di cal Bul le tin of Ha se ki 2012; 50: 81-8)
topic Penetrating abdominal injury
Non-operative treatment
url http://www.hasekidergisi.com/article_4667/Effectiveness-Of-Selective-Non-operative-Treatment-In-Penetrating-Abdominal-Injuries
work_keys_str_mv AT tamerkarsıdag effectivenessofselectivenonoperativetreatmentinpenetratingabdominalinjuries
AT sefatuzun effectivenessofselectivenonoperativetreatmentinpenetratingabdominalinjuries
_version_ 1724520380096315392