Are Gap and Cast Indices Predictors of Efficacy of Reduction in Fractures of Both Bones of the Leg? A Cohort Study

Introduction: Non-operative management has successfully been practised for long in diaphyseal fractures of both bones of the leg. This study attempts to establish an acceptability criteria for plaster cast in order to predict future loss of reduction and its adequacy. Materials and Methods: A total...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shalabh K, Ajai S, Vineet K, Sabir A
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Malaysian Orthopaedic Association 2018-07-01
Series:Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.morthoj.org/2018/v12n2/gap-and-cast-indices.pdf
id doaj-5f90a00fab2d4cb1ad04d0b2999a60a5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5f90a00fab2d4cb1ad04d0b2999a60a52021-05-02T04:21:14ZengMalaysian Orthopaedic AssociationMalaysian Orthopaedic Journal1985-25332232-111X2018-07-01122151910.5704/MOJ.1807.003Are Gap and Cast Indices Predictors of Efficacy of Reduction in Fractures of Both Bones of the Leg? A Cohort StudyShalabh K0Ajai S1Vineet K2Sabir A3MSMSMSPhDIntroduction: Non-operative management has successfully been practised for long in diaphyseal fractures of both bones of the leg. This study attempts to establish an acceptability criteria for plaster cast in order to predict future loss of reduction and its adequacy. Materials and Methods: A total of forty subjects were included as per inclusion-exclusion criteria. Gap and cast indices were calculated in the immediate post reduction phase and at third week follow-up visit. Results: The mean values of gap and cast indices in the immediate post-reduction phase were 0.35±0.220 and 0.99±0.08 respectively and at the third week follow-up the mean value for both the parameters in those without loss of reduction were 1.11±0.50 and 1.03±0.09 respectively and in those with loss of reduction were 0.84±0.44 and 1.01±0.06 respectively. Conclusion: Gap and cast indices are not informative in assessing adequacy of reduction in diaphyseal fractures of both bones of the leg.http://www.morthoj.org/2018/v12n2/gap-and-cast-indices.pdfgap indexcast indexnon-operative managementtibia and fibula
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shalabh K
Ajai S
Vineet K
Sabir A
spellingShingle Shalabh K
Ajai S
Vineet K
Sabir A
Are Gap and Cast Indices Predictors of Efficacy of Reduction in Fractures of Both Bones of the Leg? A Cohort Study
Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
gap index
cast index
non-operative management
tibia and fibula
author_facet Shalabh K
Ajai S
Vineet K
Sabir A
author_sort Shalabh K
title Are Gap and Cast Indices Predictors of Efficacy of Reduction in Fractures of Both Bones of the Leg? A Cohort Study
title_short Are Gap and Cast Indices Predictors of Efficacy of Reduction in Fractures of Both Bones of the Leg? A Cohort Study
title_full Are Gap and Cast Indices Predictors of Efficacy of Reduction in Fractures of Both Bones of the Leg? A Cohort Study
title_fullStr Are Gap and Cast Indices Predictors of Efficacy of Reduction in Fractures of Both Bones of the Leg? A Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Are Gap and Cast Indices Predictors of Efficacy of Reduction in Fractures of Both Bones of the Leg? A Cohort Study
title_sort are gap and cast indices predictors of efficacy of reduction in fractures of both bones of the leg? a cohort study
publisher Malaysian Orthopaedic Association
series Malaysian Orthopaedic Journal
issn 1985-2533
2232-111X
publishDate 2018-07-01
description Introduction: Non-operative management has successfully been practised for long in diaphyseal fractures of both bones of the leg. This study attempts to establish an acceptability criteria for plaster cast in order to predict future loss of reduction and its adequacy. Materials and Methods: A total of forty subjects were included as per inclusion-exclusion criteria. Gap and cast indices were calculated in the immediate post reduction phase and at third week follow-up visit. Results: The mean values of gap and cast indices in the immediate post-reduction phase were 0.35±0.220 and 0.99±0.08 respectively and at the third week follow-up the mean value for both the parameters in those without loss of reduction were 1.11±0.50 and 1.03±0.09 respectively and in those with loss of reduction were 0.84±0.44 and 1.01±0.06 respectively. Conclusion: Gap and cast indices are not informative in assessing adequacy of reduction in diaphyseal fractures of both bones of the leg.
topic gap index
cast index
non-operative management
tibia and fibula
url http://www.morthoj.org/2018/v12n2/gap-and-cast-indices.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT shalabhk aregapandcastindicespredictorsofefficacyofreductioninfracturesofbothbonesofthelegacohortstudy
AT ajais aregapandcastindicespredictorsofefficacyofreductioninfracturesofbothbonesofthelegacohortstudy
AT vineetk aregapandcastindicespredictorsofefficacyofreductioninfracturesofbothbonesofthelegacohortstudy
AT sabira aregapandcastindicespredictorsofefficacyofreductioninfracturesofbothbonesofthelegacohortstudy
_version_ 1721495295321178112