Sujet ou auxiliaire ?
This paper highlights the benefit of adding a materialist feminist perspective to the analysis of collective action frames by drawing on the study of the Egyptian radical left’s revolutionary discourse. Such an approach provides some insight into the fact that the Egyptian revolution has increased t...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Les Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme
2018-10-01
|
Series: | Socio |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/socio/3627 |
id |
doaj-5f8859ba71b74e2082ee0dea9ecb00ed |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5f8859ba71b74e2082ee0dea9ecb00ed2020-11-25T01:21:38ZengLes Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’HommeSocio2266-31342425-21582018-10-011120122510.4000/socio.3627Sujet ou auxiliaire ?Dina BeblawiThis paper highlights the benefit of adding a materialist feminist perspective to the analysis of collective action frames by drawing on the study of the Egyptian radical left’s revolutionary discourse. Such an approach provides some insight into the fact that the Egyptian revolution has increased the political visibility of women, without being able to weaken the patriarchal structures. By exploring the links between the discursive strategies for representing the revolution and the dynamics of gender relations, I show that the construction of a pseudo-universal revolutionary subject, masking the plurality of categories involved in the mobilization, undermines the possibility of a struggle carried by women within the revolutionary movement rather than at its margin.http://journals.openedition.org/socio/3627collective action framesEgyptian revolutiongenderradical left |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dina Beblawi |
spellingShingle |
Dina Beblawi Sujet ou auxiliaire ? Socio collective action frames Egyptian revolution gender radical left |
author_facet |
Dina Beblawi |
author_sort |
Dina Beblawi |
title |
Sujet ou auxiliaire ? |
title_short |
Sujet ou auxiliaire ? |
title_full |
Sujet ou auxiliaire ? |
title_fullStr |
Sujet ou auxiliaire ? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sujet ou auxiliaire ? |
title_sort |
sujet ou auxiliaire ? |
publisher |
Les Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme |
series |
Socio |
issn |
2266-3134 2425-2158 |
publishDate |
2018-10-01 |
description |
This paper highlights the benefit of adding a materialist feminist perspective to the analysis of collective action frames by drawing on the study of the Egyptian radical left’s revolutionary discourse. Such an approach provides some insight into the fact that the Egyptian revolution has increased the political visibility of women, without being able to weaken the patriarchal structures. By exploring the links between the discursive strategies for representing the revolution and the dynamics of gender relations, I show that the construction of a pseudo-universal revolutionary subject, masking the plurality of categories involved in the mobilization, undermines the possibility of a struggle carried by women within the revolutionary movement rather than at its margin. |
topic |
collective action frames Egyptian revolution gender radical left |
url |
http://journals.openedition.org/socio/3627 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT dinabeblawi sujetouauxiliaire |
_version_ |
1725129292085460992 |