Sujet ou auxiliaire ?

This paper highlights the benefit of adding a materialist feminist perspective to the analysis of collective action frames by drawing on the study of the Egyptian radical left’s revolutionary discourse. Such an approach provides some insight into the fact that the Egyptian revolution has increased t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dina Beblawi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Les Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme 2018-10-01
Series:Socio
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/socio/3627
id doaj-5f8859ba71b74e2082ee0dea9ecb00ed
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5f8859ba71b74e2082ee0dea9ecb00ed2020-11-25T01:21:38ZengLes Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’HommeSocio2266-31342425-21582018-10-011120122510.4000/socio.3627Sujet ou auxiliaire ?Dina BeblawiThis paper highlights the benefit of adding a materialist feminist perspective to the analysis of collective action frames by drawing on the study of the Egyptian radical left’s revolutionary discourse. Such an approach provides some insight into the fact that the Egyptian revolution has increased the political visibility of women, without being able to weaken the patriarchal structures. By exploring the links between the discursive strategies for representing the revolution and the dynamics of gender relations, I show that the construction of a pseudo-universal revolutionary subject, masking the plurality of categories involved in the mobilization, undermines the possibility of a struggle carried by women within the revolutionary movement rather than at its margin.http://journals.openedition.org/socio/3627collective action framesEgyptian revolutiongenderradical left
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dina Beblawi
spellingShingle Dina Beblawi
Sujet ou auxiliaire ?
Socio
collective action frames
Egyptian revolution
gender
radical left
author_facet Dina Beblawi
author_sort Dina Beblawi
title Sujet ou auxiliaire ?
title_short Sujet ou auxiliaire ?
title_full Sujet ou auxiliaire ?
title_fullStr Sujet ou auxiliaire ?
title_full_unstemmed Sujet ou auxiliaire ?
title_sort sujet ou auxiliaire ?
publisher Les Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme
series Socio
issn 2266-3134
2425-2158
publishDate 2018-10-01
description This paper highlights the benefit of adding a materialist feminist perspective to the analysis of collective action frames by drawing on the study of the Egyptian radical left’s revolutionary discourse. Such an approach provides some insight into the fact that the Egyptian revolution has increased the political visibility of women, without being able to weaken the patriarchal structures. By exploring the links between the discursive strategies for representing the revolution and the dynamics of gender relations, I show that the construction of a pseudo-universal revolutionary subject, masking the plurality of categories involved in the mobilization, undermines the possibility of a struggle carried by women within the revolutionary movement rather than at its margin.
topic collective action frames
Egyptian revolution
gender
radical left
url http://journals.openedition.org/socio/3627
work_keys_str_mv AT dinabeblawi sujetouauxiliaire
_version_ 1725129292085460992