Variable selection in multivariate multiple regression.
<h4>Introduction</h4>In many practical situations, we are interested in the effect of covariates on correlated multiple responses. In this paper, we focus on estimation and variable selection in multi-response multiple regression models. Correlation among the response variables must be m...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2020-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236067 |
id |
doaj-5f880c3a1f9c48f48e170f4f969ba179 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5f880c3a1f9c48f48e170f4f969ba1792021-03-04T11:16:20ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01157e023606710.1371/journal.pone.0236067Variable selection in multivariate multiple regression.Asokan Mulayath VariyathAnita Brobbey<h4>Introduction</h4>In many practical situations, we are interested in the effect of covariates on correlated multiple responses. In this paper, we focus on estimation and variable selection in multi-response multiple regression models. Correlation among the response variables must be modeled for valid inference.<h4>Method</h4>We used an extension of the generalized estimating equation (GEE) methodology to simultaneously analyze binary, count, and continuous outcomes with nonlinear functions. Variable selection plays an important role in modeling correlated responses because of the large number of model parameters that must be estimated. We propose a penalized-likelihood approach based on the extended GEEs for simultaneous parameter estimation and variable selection.<h4>Results and conclusions</h4>We conducted a series of Monte Carlo simulations to investigate the performance of our method, considering different sample sizes and numbers of response variables. The results showed that our method works well compared to treating the responses as uncorrelated. We recommend using an unstructured correlation model with the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) to select the tuning parameters. We demonstrated our method using data from a concrete slump test.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236067 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Asokan Mulayath Variyath Anita Brobbey |
spellingShingle |
Asokan Mulayath Variyath Anita Brobbey Variable selection in multivariate multiple regression. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Asokan Mulayath Variyath Anita Brobbey |
author_sort |
Asokan Mulayath Variyath |
title |
Variable selection in multivariate multiple regression. |
title_short |
Variable selection in multivariate multiple regression. |
title_full |
Variable selection in multivariate multiple regression. |
title_fullStr |
Variable selection in multivariate multiple regression. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Variable selection in multivariate multiple regression. |
title_sort |
variable selection in multivariate multiple regression. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
<h4>Introduction</h4>In many practical situations, we are interested in the effect of covariates on correlated multiple responses. In this paper, we focus on estimation and variable selection in multi-response multiple regression models. Correlation among the response variables must be modeled for valid inference.<h4>Method</h4>We used an extension of the generalized estimating equation (GEE) methodology to simultaneously analyze binary, count, and continuous outcomes with nonlinear functions. Variable selection plays an important role in modeling correlated responses because of the large number of model parameters that must be estimated. We propose a penalized-likelihood approach based on the extended GEEs for simultaneous parameter estimation and variable selection.<h4>Results and conclusions</h4>We conducted a series of Monte Carlo simulations to investigate the performance of our method, considering different sample sizes and numbers of response variables. The results showed that our method works well compared to treating the responses as uncorrelated. We recommend using an unstructured correlation model with the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) to select the tuning parameters. We demonstrated our method using data from a concrete slump test. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236067 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT asokanmulayathvariyath variableselectioninmultivariatemultipleregression AT anitabrobbey variableselectioninmultivariatemultipleregression |
_version_ |
1714804153665978368 |