An optimal glycemic load range is better for reducing obesity and diabetes risk among middle-aged and elderly adults

Abstract Background Due to the lack of evidence, advice pertaining to glycemic load (GL) can be misleading. Does the excessive restriction of GL, mostly through an extreme reduction in carbohydrate intake, result in a relatively high intake of fat and protein and result in overweight and obesity? Th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fengyi He, Chaogang Chen, Feng Li, Yiqin Qi, Xiuhong Lin, Ping Liang, Meng Ren, Li Yan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-03-01
Series:Nutrition & Metabolism
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12986-020-00504-5
id doaj-5f72dea49bcd49f2a95aca212ac9377b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5f72dea49bcd49f2a95aca212ac9377b2021-03-28T11:42:40ZengBMCNutrition & Metabolism1743-70752021-03-0118111010.1186/s12986-020-00504-5An optimal glycemic load range is better for reducing obesity and diabetes risk among middle-aged and elderly adultsFengyi He0Chaogang Chen1Feng Li2Yiqin Qi3Xiuhong Lin4Ping Liang5Meng Ren6Li Yan7Department of Clinical Nutrition, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityDepartment of Endocrinology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityDepartment of Endocrinology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityDepartment of Endocrinology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityDepartment of Endocrinology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityAbstract Background Due to the lack of evidence, advice pertaining to glycemic load (GL) can be misleading. Does the excessive restriction of GL, mostly through an extreme reduction in carbohydrate intake, result in a relatively high intake of fat and protein and result in overweight and obesity? This study was performed to initially explore the optimal GL range. Methods A cross-sectional study involving 2029 participants aged 40 years or older in Guangzhou, China was conducted. Participants were divided into four groups according to cluster analysis. Dietary data were assessed using a previously validated 3-day food record. Results Instead of participants with the highest [cluster 1, median (interquartile ranges) GL was 112(107–119)/1000 kcal] and the lowest GL intake [cluster 4, 90(82–96)/1000 kcal], those with moderate GL intakes [clusters 2 and 3, 93(85–102) and 93(85–99)/1000 kcal, respectively] had a lower prevalence of overweight, obesity and diabetes. In addition, clusters 2 and 3 were more consistent with the macronutrient intake reference with adequate micronutrient intake. Therefore, the optimal GL range was determined to be (85–100)/1000 kcal, rather than “lower is better”. Conclusions Reducing the GL intake to prevent diabetes deserves more attention in the context of a balanced diet. An appropriate GL may be better than excessive restriction.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12986-020-00504-5Cluster analysisGlycemic loadDiabetesObesity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fengyi He
Chaogang Chen
Feng Li
Yiqin Qi
Xiuhong Lin
Ping Liang
Meng Ren
Li Yan
spellingShingle Fengyi He
Chaogang Chen
Feng Li
Yiqin Qi
Xiuhong Lin
Ping Liang
Meng Ren
Li Yan
An optimal glycemic load range is better for reducing obesity and diabetes risk among middle-aged and elderly adults
Nutrition & Metabolism
Cluster analysis
Glycemic load
Diabetes
Obesity
author_facet Fengyi He
Chaogang Chen
Feng Li
Yiqin Qi
Xiuhong Lin
Ping Liang
Meng Ren
Li Yan
author_sort Fengyi He
title An optimal glycemic load range is better for reducing obesity and diabetes risk among middle-aged and elderly adults
title_short An optimal glycemic load range is better for reducing obesity and diabetes risk among middle-aged and elderly adults
title_full An optimal glycemic load range is better for reducing obesity and diabetes risk among middle-aged and elderly adults
title_fullStr An optimal glycemic load range is better for reducing obesity and diabetes risk among middle-aged and elderly adults
title_full_unstemmed An optimal glycemic load range is better for reducing obesity and diabetes risk among middle-aged and elderly adults
title_sort optimal glycemic load range is better for reducing obesity and diabetes risk among middle-aged and elderly adults
publisher BMC
series Nutrition & Metabolism
issn 1743-7075
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Abstract Background Due to the lack of evidence, advice pertaining to glycemic load (GL) can be misleading. Does the excessive restriction of GL, mostly through an extreme reduction in carbohydrate intake, result in a relatively high intake of fat and protein and result in overweight and obesity? This study was performed to initially explore the optimal GL range. Methods A cross-sectional study involving 2029 participants aged 40 years or older in Guangzhou, China was conducted. Participants were divided into four groups according to cluster analysis. Dietary data were assessed using a previously validated 3-day food record. Results Instead of participants with the highest [cluster 1, median (interquartile ranges) GL was 112(107–119)/1000 kcal] and the lowest GL intake [cluster 4, 90(82–96)/1000 kcal], those with moderate GL intakes [clusters 2 and 3, 93(85–102) and 93(85–99)/1000 kcal, respectively] had a lower prevalence of overweight, obesity and diabetes. In addition, clusters 2 and 3 were more consistent with the macronutrient intake reference with adequate micronutrient intake. Therefore, the optimal GL range was determined to be (85–100)/1000 kcal, rather than “lower is better”. Conclusions Reducing the GL intake to prevent diabetes deserves more attention in the context of a balanced diet. An appropriate GL may be better than excessive restriction.
topic Cluster analysis
Glycemic load
Diabetes
Obesity
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12986-020-00504-5
work_keys_str_mv AT fengyihe anoptimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults
AT chaogangchen anoptimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults
AT fengli anoptimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults
AT yiqinqi anoptimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults
AT xiuhonglin anoptimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults
AT pingliang anoptimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults
AT mengren anoptimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults
AT liyan anoptimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults
AT fengyihe optimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults
AT chaogangchen optimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults
AT fengli optimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults
AT yiqinqi optimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults
AT xiuhonglin optimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults
AT pingliang optimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults
AT mengren optimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults
AT liyan optimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults
_version_ 1724199732954267648