An optimal glycemic load range is better for reducing obesity and diabetes risk among middle-aged and elderly adults
Abstract Background Due to the lack of evidence, advice pertaining to glycemic load (GL) can be misleading. Does the excessive restriction of GL, mostly through an extreme reduction in carbohydrate intake, result in a relatively high intake of fat and protein and result in overweight and obesity? Th...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Nutrition & Metabolism |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12986-020-00504-5 |
id |
doaj-5f72dea49bcd49f2a95aca212ac9377b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5f72dea49bcd49f2a95aca212ac9377b2021-03-28T11:42:40ZengBMCNutrition & Metabolism1743-70752021-03-0118111010.1186/s12986-020-00504-5An optimal glycemic load range is better for reducing obesity and diabetes risk among middle-aged and elderly adultsFengyi He0Chaogang Chen1Feng Li2Yiqin Qi3Xiuhong Lin4Ping Liang5Meng Ren6Li Yan7Department of Clinical Nutrition, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityDepartment of Endocrinology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityDepartment of Endocrinology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityDepartment of Endocrinology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityDepartment of Endocrinology, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen UniversityAbstract Background Due to the lack of evidence, advice pertaining to glycemic load (GL) can be misleading. Does the excessive restriction of GL, mostly through an extreme reduction in carbohydrate intake, result in a relatively high intake of fat and protein and result in overweight and obesity? This study was performed to initially explore the optimal GL range. Methods A cross-sectional study involving 2029 participants aged 40 years or older in Guangzhou, China was conducted. Participants were divided into four groups according to cluster analysis. Dietary data were assessed using a previously validated 3-day food record. Results Instead of participants with the highest [cluster 1, median (interquartile ranges) GL was 112(107–119)/1000 kcal] and the lowest GL intake [cluster 4, 90(82–96)/1000 kcal], those with moderate GL intakes [clusters 2 and 3, 93(85–102) and 93(85–99)/1000 kcal, respectively] had a lower prevalence of overweight, obesity and diabetes. In addition, clusters 2 and 3 were more consistent with the macronutrient intake reference with adequate micronutrient intake. Therefore, the optimal GL range was determined to be (85–100)/1000 kcal, rather than “lower is better”. Conclusions Reducing the GL intake to prevent diabetes deserves more attention in the context of a balanced diet. An appropriate GL may be better than excessive restriction.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12986-020-00504-5Cluster analysisGlycemic loadDiabetesObesity |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Fengyi He Chaogang Chen Feng Li Yiqin Qi Xiuhong Lin Ping Liang Meng Ren Li Yan |
spellingShingle |
Fengyi He Chaogang Chen Feng Li Yiqin Qi Xiuhong Lin Ping Liang Meng Ren Li Yan An optimal glycemic load range is better for reducing obesity and diabetes risk among middle-aged and elderly adults Nutrition & Metabolism Cluster analysis Glycemic load Diabetes Obesity |
author_facet |
Fengyi He Chaogang Chen Feng Li Yiqin Qi Xiuhong Lin Ping Liang Meng Ren Li Yan |
author_sort |
Fengyi He |
title |
An optimal glycemic load range is better for reducing obesity and diabetes risk among middle-aged and elderly adults |
title_short |
An optimal glycemic load range is better for reducing obesity and diabetes risk among middle-aged and elderly adults |
title_full |
An optimal glycemic load range is better for reducing obesity and diabetes risk among middle-aged and elderly adults |
title_fullStr |
An optimal glycemic load range is better for reducing obesity and diabetes risk among middle-aged and elderly adults |
title_full_unstemmed |
An optimal glycemic load range is better for reducing obesity and diabetes risk among middle-aged and elderly adults |
title_sort |
optimal glycemic load range is better for reducing obesity and diabetes risk among middle-aged and elderly adults |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Nutrition & Metabolism |
issn |
1743-7075 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Due to the lack of evidence, advice pertaining to glycemic load (GL) can be misleading. Does the excessive restriction of GL, mostly through an extreme reduction in carbohydrate intake, result in a relatively high intake of fat and protein and result in overweight and obesity? This study was performed to initially explore the optimal GL range. Methods A cross-sectional study involving 2029 participants aged 40 years or older in Guangzhou, China was conducted. Participants were divided into four groups according to cluster analysis. Dietary data were assessed using a previously validated 3-day food record. Results Instead of participants with the highest [cluster 1, median (interquartile ranges) GL was 112(107–119)/1000 kcal] and the lowest GL intake [cluster 4, 90(82–96)/1000 kcal], those with moderate GL intakes [clusters 2 and 3, 93(85–102) and 93(85–99)/1000 kcal, respectively] had a lower prevalence of overweight, obesity and diabetes. In addition, clusters 2 and 3 were more consistent with the macronutrient intake reference with adequate micronutrient intake. Therefore, the optimal GL range was determined to be (85–100)/1000 kcal, rather than “lower is better”. Conclusions Reducing the GL intake to prevent diabetes deserves more attention in the context of a balanced diet. An appropriate GL may be better than excessive restriction. |
topic |
Cluster analysis Glycemic load Diabetes Obesity |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12986-020-00504-5 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fengyihe anoptimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults AT chaogangchen anoptimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults AT fengli anoptimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults AT yiqinqi anoptimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults AT xiuhonglin anoptimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults AT pingliang anoptimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults AT mengren anoptimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults AT liyan anoptimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults AT fengyihe optimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults AT chaogangchen optimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults AT fengli optimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults AT yiqinqi optimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults AT xiuhonglin optimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults AT pingliang optimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults AT mengren optimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults AT liyan optimalglycemicloadrangeisbetterforreducingobesityanddiabetesriskamongmiddleagedandelderlyadults |
_version_ |
1724199732954267648 |