A Scientometrics Study of Iranian Retracted Papers

This is to study Iranian retracted papers indexed in Web of Science (WOS) in various structural and content-wise aspects from the beginning to 2017, to identify cases that have ended up to retraction, and finally, to investigate the relationship between retraction and publication of these articles....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shima Moradi, Elmira Janavi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Iranian Research Institute for Information and Technology 2018-09-01
Series:Iranian Journal of Information Processing & Management
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-3-3&slc_lang=en&sid=1
id doaj-5f70957871124268814563d8ed5c6777
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5f70957871124268814563d8ed5c67772020-11-25T00:48:18ZfasIranian Research Institute for Information and TechnologyIranian Journal of Information Processing & Management2251-82232251-82312018-09-0133417891808A Scientometrics Study of Iranian Retracted PapersShima Moradi0Elmira Janavi1 National Research Institute for Science Policy (NRISP) National Research Institute for Science Policy (NRISP) This is to study Iranian retracted papers indexed in Web of Science (WOS) in various structural and content-wise aspects from the beginning to 2017, to identify cases that have ended up to retraction, and finally, to investigate the relationship between retraction and publication of these articles. The final research population is 103 papers out of 320872 using scientometrics method with content analysis approach. The result shows that the retraction rate has increased from the year 2008, but there is no significant correlation between this rate and publication rate. The citation rate and international scholarly communication in these articles is very low. Most of the papers have been written by three and more authors and different areas of science have been retracted while pure sciences, engineering and medicine were the most. The highest type of scientific misconducting was plagiarism. In short, there is a significant growth in retraction rate of Iranian papers in WOS.http://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-3-3&slc_lang=en&sid=1Scientific MisconductingScientific MisbehaviorRetracted ArticlesRetraction
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shima Moradi
Elmira Janavi
spellingShingle Shima Moradi
Elmira Janavi
A Scientometrics Study of Iranian Retracted Papers
Iranian Journal of Information Processing & Management
Scientific Misconducting
Scientific Misbehavior
Retracted Articles
Retraction
author_facet Shima Moradi
Elmira Janavi
author_sort Shima Moradi
title A Scientometrics Study of Iranian Retracted Papers
title_short A Scientometrics Study of Iranian Retracted Papers
title_full A Scientometrics Study of Iranian Retracted Papers
title_fullStr A Scientometrics Study of Iranian Retracted Papers
title_full_unstemmed A Scientometrics Study of Iranian Retracted Papers
title_sort scientometrics study of iranian retracted papers
publisher Iranian Research Institute for Information and Technology
series Iranian Journal of Information Processing & Management
issn 2251-8223
2251-8231
publishDate 2018-09-01
description This is to study Iranian retracted papers indexed in Web of Science (WOS) in various structural and content-wise aspects from the beginning to 2017, to identify cases that have ended up to retraction, and finally, to investigate the relationship between retraction and publication of these articles. The final research population is 103 papers out of 320872 using scientometrics method with content analysis approach. The result shows that the retraction rate has increased from the year 2008, but there is no significant correlation between this rate and publication rate. The citation rate and international scholarly communication in these articles is very low. Most of the papers have been written by three and more authors and different areas of science have been retracted while pure sciences, engineering and medicine were the most. The highest type of scientific misconducting was plagiarism. In short, there is a significant growth in retraction rate of Iranian papers in WOS.
topic Scientific Misconducting
Scientific Misbehavior
Retracted Articles
Retraction
url http://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-3-3&slc_lang=en&sid=1
work_keys_str_mv AT shimamoradi ascientometricsstudyofiranianretractedpapers
AT elmirajanavi ascientometricsstudyofiranianretractedpapers
AT shimamoradi scientometricsstudyofiranianretractedpapers
AT elmirajanavi scientometricsstudyofiranianretractedpapers
_version_ 1725256740271816704