Constitutional Analysis of Intellectual Property

This article analyses the Constitutional Court’s treatment of property interests in the face of state regulation to gain an understanding of the type of state interference that is justifiable in terms of section 25(1) of the Bill of Rights. This is done by examining the Constitutional Court’s dicta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: AJ van der Walt, RM Shay
Format: Article
Language:Afrikaans
Published: North-West University 2014-04-01
Series:Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.nwu.ac.za/sites/www.nwu.ac.za/files/files/p-per/issuepages/2014volume17no1/2014%2817%291VanderWalt%26ShayART.pdf
id doaj-5f6be93d900046b2a36cb7764589a048
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5f6be93d900046b2a36cb7764589a0482020-11-25T03:23:29ZafrNorth-West UniversityPotchefstroom Electronic Law Journal1727-37812014-04-011715185http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/pelj.v17i1.02Constitutional Analysis of Intellectual Property AJ van der Walt 0RM Shay1Stellenbosch UniversityUniversity of South AfricaThis article analyses the Constitutional Court’s treatment of property interests in the face of state regulation to gain an understanding of the type of state interference that is justifiable in terms of section 25(1) of the Bill of Rights. This is done by examining the Constitutional Court’s dicta relating to the meaning of deprivation and how these inform the meaning of property in the constitutional context. The methodology that the Constitutional Court has formulated to assess if state interference complies with the provisions of section 25 is explained to show the type of state regulation that has been found legitimate. We then consider how this understanding of constitutional property and the state’s legitimate exercise of its inherent police power interact in the setting of intellectual property by contrasting the various policy objectives underlying the different statutory regimes governing intellectual property. This theoretical analysis is then applied to two contemporary examples of feasible state interference with existing intellectual property interests, namely the proposed plain packaging measures which severely restrict the use of tobacco trade marks, and a fair dealing exception allowing the use of copyright works for the purpose of parody. These examples serve to illustrate the context and manner in which intellectual property interests may come before the Court and the necessary differentiation with which these interests should be treated. The appropriate judicial assessment of the true impact that state action could have on vested property interests is explained and contrasted with the balancing exercise that is employed at the earlier stage of policy making. This discussion is concluded by highlighting some of the interpretational issues that will arise and how some constitutional values could be curtailed in the absence of legislative intervention. http://www.nwu.ac.za/sites/www.nwu.ac.za/files/files/p-per/issuepages/2014volume17no1/2014%2817%291VanderWalt%26ShayART.pdfIntellectual property law; constitutional property law; constitutional property clause; trademarks; copyright; parody; plain packaging; subsidiarity; deprivation; regulation; substantive arbitrariness
collection DOAJ
language Afrikaans
format Article
sources DOAJ
author AJ van der Walt
RM Shay
spellingShingle AJ van der Walt
RM Shay
Constitutional Analysis of Intellectual Property
Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
Intellectual property law; constitutional property law; constitutional property clause; trademarks; copyright; parody; plain packaging; subsidiarity; deprivation; regulation; substantive arbitrariness
author_facet AJ van der Walt
RM Shay
author_sort AJ van der Walt
title Constitutional Analysis of Intellectual Property
title_short Constitutional Analysis of Intellectual Property
title_full Constitutional Analysis of Intellectual Property
title_fullStr Constitutional Analysis of Intellectual Property
title_full_unstemmed Constitutional Analysis of Intellectual Property
title_sort constitutional analysis of intellectual property
publisher North-West University
series Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal
issn 1727-3781
publishDate 2014-04-01
description This article analyses the Constitutional Court’s treatment of property interests in the face of state regulation to gain an understanding of the type of state interference that is justifiable in terms of section 25(1) of the Bill of Rights. This is done by examining the Constitutional Court’s dicta relating to the meaning of deprivation and how these inform the meaning of property in the constitutional context. The methodology that the Constitutional Court has formulated to assess if state interference complies with the provisions of section 25 is explained to show the type of state regulation that has been found legitimate. We then consider how this understanding of constitutional property and the state’s legitimate exercise of its inherent police power interact in the setting of intellectual property by contrasting the various policy objectives underlying the different statutory regimes governing intellectual property. This theoretical analysis is then applied to two contemporary examples of feasible state interference with existing intellectual property interests, namely the proposed plain packaging measures which severely restrict the use of tobacco trade marks, and a fair dealing exception allowing the use of copyright works for the purpose of parody. These examples serve to illustrate the context and manner in which intellectual property interests may come before the Court and the necessary differentiation with which these interests should be treated. The appropriate judicial assessment of the true impact that state action could have on vested property interests is explained and contrasted with the balancing exercise that is employed at the earlier stage of policy making. This discussion is concluded by highlighting some of the interpretational issues that will arise and how some constitutional values could be curtailed in the absence of legislative intervention.
topic Intellectual property law; constitutional property law; constitutional property clause; trademarks; copyright; parody; plain packaging; subsidiarity; deprivation; regulation; substantive arbitrariness
url http://www.nwu.ac.za/sites/www.nwu.ac.za/files/files/p-per/issuepages/2014volume17no1/2014%2817%291VanderWalt%26ShayART.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ajvanderwalt constitutionalanalysisofintellectualproperty
AT rmshay constitutionalanalysisofintellectualproperty
_version_ 1724606063491153920