P300 Component Modulation During a Go/Nogo Task in Healthy Children

ABSTRACT Introduction: Several differences in the P300 component are observed when responses must be executed or inhibited in the Go/Nogo task. However, few studies were established by using well-controlled task with respect to the preparatory processing and stimulus probability. In the present stud...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad Ali Nazari, Fabrice Wallois, Ardalan Aarabi, Masoud Nosratabadi, Patrick Berquin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Iran University of Medical Sciences 2010-11-01
Series:Basic and Clinical Neuroscience
Subjects:
ERP
Online Access:http://bcn.iums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-2-7&slc_lang=en&sid=1
id doaj-5f6adb9e20614460be1b914be9be4ba2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5f6adb9e20614460be1b914be9be4ba22020-11-25T01:41:54ZengIran University of Medical SciencesBasic and Clinical Neuroscience2008-126X2228-74422010-11-01213136P300 Component Modulation During a Go/Nogo Task in Healthy ChildrenMohammad Ali Nazari0Fabrice Wallois1Ardalan Aarabi2Masoud Nosratabadi3Patrick Berquin4 ABSTRACT Introduction: Several differences in the P300 component are observed when responses must be executed or inhibited in the Go/Nogo task. However, few studies were established by using well-controlled task with respect to the preparatory processing and stimulus probability. In the present study, we examined the peak amplitude and latency of Go-P300 (P300 evoked by visual Go stimuli) and Nogo-P300 (P300 evoked by visual Nogo stimuli) component in healthy children. Methods: High resolution EEG data were recorded from 13 children (7-11 years old) during a cued equiprobable Go/Nogo task. The P300 component was measured at frontal (F3, Fz, F4) and parietal (P3, Pz, P4) regions in response to both Go and Nogo stimuli. Data were analyzes using a three-way repeated measures ANOVA.Results: These children displayed higher P300 amplitude in the Go relative to Nogo condition at parietal region. In addition, decrease in P300 latency was observed at the frontal in comparison to parietal region.Discussion: The results might suggest that the P300 is related to different processes or arise from different generators in execution and inhibition conditions.http://bcn.iums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-2-7&slc_lang=en&sid=1ERPP300Go/Nogo TaskHealthy Children.
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mohammad Ali Nazari
Fabrice Wallois
Ardalan Aarabi
Masoud Nosratabadi
Patrick Berquin
spellingShingle Mohammad Ali Nazari
Fabrice Wallois
Ardalan Aarabi
Masoud Nosratabadi
Patrick Berquin
P300 Component Modulation During a Go/Nogo Task in Healthy Children
Basic and Clinical Neuroscience
ERP
P300
Go/Nogo Task
Healthy Children.
author_facet Mohammad Ali Nazari
Fabrice Wallois
Ardalan Aarabi
Masoud Nosratabadi
Patrick Berquin
author_sort Mohammad Ali Nazari
title P300 Component Modulation During a Go/Nogo Task in Healthy Children
title_short P300 Component Modulation During a Go/Nogo Task in Healthy Children
title_full P300 Component Modulation During a Go/Nogo Task in Healthy Children
title_fullStr P300 Component Modulation During a Go/Nogo Task in Healthy Children
title_full_unstemmed P300 Component Modulation During a Go/Nogo Task in Healthy Children
title_sort p300 component modulation during a go/nogo task in healthy children
publisher Iran University of Medical Sciences
series Basic and Clinical Neuroscience
issn 2008-126X
2228-7442
publishDate 2010-11-01
description ABSTRACT Introduction: Several differences in the P300 component are observed when responses must be executed or inhibited in the Go/Nogo task. However, few studies were established by using well-controlled task with respect to the preparatory processing and stimulus probability. In the present study, we examined the peak amplitude and latency of Go-P300 (P300 evoked by visual Go stimuli) and Nogo-P300 (P300 evoked by visual Nogo stimuli) component in healthy children. Methods: High resolution EEG data were recorded from 13 children (7-11 years old) during a cued equiprobable Go/Nogo task. The P300 component was measured at frontal (F3, Fz, F4) and parietal (P3, Pz, P4) regions in response to both Go and Nogo stimuli. Data were analyzes using a three-way repeated measures ANOVA.Results: These children displayed higher P300 amplitude in the Go relative to Nogo condition at parietal region. In addition, decrease in P300 latency was observed at the frontal in comparison to parietal region.Discussion: The results might suggest that the P300 is related to different processes or arise from different generators in execution and inhibition conditions.
topic ERP
P300
Go/Nogo Task
Healthy Children.
url http://bcn.iums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-2-7&slc_lang=en&sid=1
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadalinazari p300componentmodulationduringagonogotaskinhealthychildren
AT fabricewallois p300componentmodulationduringagonogotaskinhealthychildren
AT ardalanaarabi p300componentmodulationduringagonogotaskinhealthychildren
AT masoudnosratabadi p300componentmodulationduringagonogotaskinhealthychildren
AT patrickberquin p300componentmodulationduringagonogotaskinhealthychildren
_version_ 1725039043743318016