Modality force and syntax in an understudied class of reduced why-questions in English

This paper analyzes the syntactic and interpretive components of a frequently used but understudied type of reduced why-question in English, referred to as 'Why-VP', as in 'why take Structure of Japanese'? Using a substantial corpus of naturally occurring examples, it is argued t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anissa Zaitsu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Open Library of Humanities 2020-01-01
Series:Glossa
Subjects:
why
Online Access:https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/870
id doaj-5f69451efc6842ae9b12dfab86853e09
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5f69451efc6842ae9b12dfab86853e092021-09-02T15:10:23ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesGlossa2397-18352020-01-015110.5334/gjgl.870453Modality force and syntax in an understudied class of reduced why-questions in EnglishAnissa Zaitsu0Stanford UniversityThis paper analyzes the syntactic and interpretive components of a frequently used but understudied type of reduced why-question in English, referred to as 'Why-VP', as in 'why take Structure of Japanese'? Using a substantial corpus of naturally occurring examples, it is argued that why in Why-VP is in fact a head which selects a null infinitival head, hosting in its specifier a structural subject, pro, and which in turn selects the familiar verbal projections (Voice/V). Previous work on Why-VP has suggested that it is necessarily elliptical and that it is necessarily rhetorical (conveying a preference). These assumptions led to proposals appealing to special compositional technologies. Analysis of the naturally-occurring examples, however, reveals that Why-VP retains a true interrogative interpretation. The syntactic structure proposed, in which Why-VP is an infinitival wh-question, predicts that it should have a modal interpretation, following Bhatt’s (1999) analysis of covert modality in embedded wh-infinitivals. It is the modal interpretation characteristic of Why-VP that contributes to the rhetorical flavor, but that also allows for the genuine-question reading. Thus, we need rely only on independently available and familiar compositional mechanisms to understand the observed pragmatic effects.https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/870whymodalityellipsisclause structurerhetorical questionsextended projection
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Anissa Zaitsu
spellingShingle Anissa Zaitsu
Modality force and syntax in an understudied class of reduced why-questions in English
Glossa
why
modality
ellipsis
clause structure
rhetorical questions
extended projection
author_facet Anissa Zaitsu
author_sort Anissa Zaitsu
title Modality force and syntax in an understudied class of reduced why-questions in English
title_short Modality force and syntax in an understudied class of reduced why-questions in English
title_full Modality force and syntax in an understudied class of reduced why-questions in English
title_fullStr Modality force and syntax in an understudied class of reduced why-questions in English
title_full_unstemmed Modality force and syntax in an understudied class of reduced why-questions in English
title_sort modality force and syntax in an understudied class of reduced why-questions in english
publisher Open Library of Humanities
series Glossa
issn 2397-1835
publishDate 2020-01-01
description This paper analyzes the syntactic and interpretive components of a frequently used but understudied type of reduced why-question in English, referred to as 'Why-VP', as in 'why take Structure of Japanese'? Using a substantial corpus of naturally occurring examples, it is argued that why in Why-VP is in fact a head which selects a null infinitival head, hosting in its specifier a structural subject, pro, and which in turn selects the familiar verbal projections (Voice/V). Previous work on Why-VP has suggested that it is necessarily elliptical and that it is necessarily rhetorical (conveying a preference). These assumptions led to proposals appealing to special compositional technologies. Analysis of the naturally-occurring examples, however, reveals that Why-VP retains a true interrogative interpretation. The syntactic structure proposed, in which Why-VP is an infinitival wh-question, predicts that it should have a modal interpretation, following Bhatt’s (1999) analysis of covert modality in embedded wh-infinitivals. It is the modal interpretation characteristic of Why-VP that contributes to the rhetorical flavor, but that also allows for the genuine-question reading. Thus, we need rely only on independently available and familiar compositional mechanisms to understand the observed pragmatic effects.
topic why
modality
ellipsis
clause structure
rhetorical questions
extended projection
url https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/870
work_keys_str_mv AT anissazaitsu modalityforceandsyntaxinanunderstudiedclassofreducedwhyquestionsinenglish
_version_ 1724162915352707072