Modality force and syntax in an understudied class of reduced why-questions in English
This paper analyzes the syntactic and interpretive components of a frequently used but understudied type of reduced why-question in English, referred to as 'Why-VP', as in 'why take Structure of Japanese'? Using a substantial corpus of naturally occurring examples, it is argued t...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Open Library of Humanities
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Glossa |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/870 |
id |
doaj-5f69451efc6842ae9b12dfab86853e09 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5f69451efc6842ae9b12dfab86853e092021-09-02T15:10:23ZengOpen Library of HumanitiesGlossa2397-18352020-01-015110.5334/gjgl.870453Modality force and syntax in an understudied class of reduced why-questions in EnglishAnissa Zaitsu0Stanford UniversityThis paper analyzes the syntactic and interpretive components of a frequently used but understudied type of reduced why-question in English, referred to as 'Why-VP', as in 'why take Structure of Japanese'? Using a substantial corpus of naturally occurring examples, it is argued that why in Why-VP is in fact a head which selects a null infinitival head, hosting in its specifier a structural subject, pro, and which in turn selects the familiar verbal projections (Voice/V). Previous work on Why-VP has suggested that it is necessarily elliptical and that it is necessarily rhetorical (conveying a preference). These assumptions led to proposals appealing to special compositional technologies. Analysis of the naturally-occurring examples, however, reveals that Why-VP retains a true interrogative interpretation. The syntactic structure proposed, in which Why-VP is an infinitival wh-question, predicts that it should have a modal interpretation, following Bhatt’s (1999) analysis of covert modality in embedded wh-infinitivals. It is the modal interpretation characteristic of Why-VP that contributes to the rhetorical flavor, but that also allows for the genuine-question reading. Thus, we need rely only on independently available and familiar compositional mechanisms to understand the observed pragmatic effects.https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/870whymodalityellipsisclause structurerhetorical questionsextended projection |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Anissa Zaitsu |
spellingShingle |
Anissa Zaitsu Modality force and syntax in an understudied class of reduced why-questions in English Glossa why modality ellipsis clause structure rhetorical questions extended projection |
author_facet |
Anissa Zaitsu |
author_sort |
Anissa Zaitsu |
title |
Modality force and syntax in an understudied class of reduced why-questions in English |
title_short |
Modality force and syntax in an understudied class of reduced why-questions in English |
title_full |
Modality force and syntax in an understudied class of reduced why-questions in English |
title_fullStr |
Modality force and syntax in an understudied class of reduced why-questions in English |
title_full_unstemmed |
Modality force and syntax in an understudied class of reduced why-questions in English |
title_sort |
modality force and syntax in an understudied class of reduced why-questions in english |
publisher |
Open Library of Humanities |
series |
Glossa |
issn |
2397-1835 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
This paper analyzes the syntactic and interpretive components of a frequently used but understudied type of reduced why-question in English, referred to as 'Why-VP', as in 'why take Structure of Japanese'? Using a substantial corpus of naturally occurring examples, it is argued that why in Why-VP is in fact a head which selects a null infinitival head, hosting in its specifier a structural subject, pro, and which in turn selects the familiar verbal projections (Voice/V). Previous work on Why-VP has suggested that it is necessarily elliptical and that it is necessarily rhetorical (conveying a preference). These assumptions led to proposals appealing to special compositional technologies. Analysis of the naturally-occurring examples, however, reveals that Why-VP retains a true interrogative interpretation. The syntactic structure proposed, in which Why-VP is an infinitival wh-question, predicts that it should have a modal interpretation, following Bhatt’s (1999) analysis of covert modality in embedded wh-infinitivals. It is the modal interpretation characteristic of Why-VP that contributes to the rhetorical flavor, but that also allows for the genuine-question reading. Thus, we need rely only on independently available and familiar compositional mechanisms to understand the observed pragmatic effects. |
topic |
why modality ellipsis clause structure rhetorical questions extended projection |
url |
https://www.glossa-journal.org/articles/870 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT anissazaitsu modalityforceandsyntaxinanunderstudiedclassofreducedwhyquestionsinenglish |
_version_ |
1724162915352707072 |