Kristeva's Reformation

<p>In my brief remarks, I consider what it means to return and rebind—that is to say, the significance of the <em>re</em> for Kristeva’s thought.  Kristeva does not just talk about binding or birth, or unbinding or death, but rather rebinding and rebirth, suggesting that it is a re...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kelly Oliver
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2014-12-01
Series:Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jffp.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/jffp/article/view/651
id doaj-5f6583440d674b48bcda1075f089199a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5f6583440d674b48bcda1075f089199a2020-11-24T20:59:01ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghJournal of French and Francophone Philosophy1936-62802155-11622014-12-01222202510.5195/jffp.2014.651559Kristeva's ReformationKelly Oliver0Vanderbilt University<p>In my brief remarks, I consider what it means to return and rebind—that is to say, the significance of the <em>re</em> for Kristeva’s thought.  Kristeva does not just talk about binding or birth, or unbinding or death, but rather rebinding and rebirth, suggesting that it is a retrospective return rather than an original moment that is crucial.  The most significant moment, then, is not the moment of imaginary plenitude, nor the moment of originary loss, but rather the moment of rebirth that comes through rebinding after the loss of plenitude.  Indeed, Kristeva’s insistence on re-turning suggests that there is no originary moment of plenitude nor of castration or loss, but rather a constant movement of compensation for a recurrent loss.  By emphasizing rebinding and rebirth, she underscores not the loss as cutting wound but rather the healing power of signification, always already inherent within loss.  The flip-side of separation is reattachment.  And rather than just focus on the separation or cut, Kristeva looks to that which allows us to rebind and reattach in order to create relations that sustain us.  Both unbinding and binding are necessary for rebinding.  Thus, by focusing on rebinding, Kristeva insists on the process of unbinding and binding, and the oscillation between them.</p>http://jffp.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/jffp/article/view/651KristevaRevoltPsychoanalysisAdolescenceNihilism
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kelly Oliver
spellingShingle Kelly Oliver
Kristeva's Reformation
Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy
Kristeva
Revolt
Psychoanalysis
Adolescence
Nihilism
author_facet Kelly Oliver
author_sort Kelly Oliver
title Kristeva's Reformation
title_short Kristeva's Reformation
title_full Kristeva's Reformation
title_fullStr Kristeva's Reformation
title_full_unstemmed Kristeva's Reformation
title_sort kristeva's reformation
publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
series Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy
issn 1936-6280
2155-1162
publishDate 2014-12-01
description <p>In my brief remarks, I consider what it means to return and rebind—that is to say, the significance of the <em>re</em> for Kristeva’s thought.  Kristeva does not just talk about binding or birth, or unbinding or death, but rather rebinding and rebirth, suggesting that it is a retrospective return rather than an original moment that is crucial.  The most significant moment, then, is not the moment of imaginary plenitude, nor the moment of originary loss, but rather the moment of rebirth that comes through rebinding after the loss of plenitude.  Indeed, Kristeva’s insistence on re-turning suggests that there is no originary moment of plenitude nor of castration or loss, but rather a constant movement of compensation for a recurrent loss.  By emphasizing rebinding and rebirth, she underscores not the loss as cutting wound but rather the healing power of signification, always already inherent within loss.  The flip-side of separation is reattachment.  And rather than just focus on the separation or cut, Kristeva looks to that which allows us to rebind and reattach in order to create relations that sustain us.  Both unbinding and binding are necessary for rebinding.  Thus, by focusing on rebinding, Kristeva insists on the process of unbinding and binding, and the oscillation between them.</p>
topic Kristeva
Revolt
Psychoanalysis
Adolescence
Nihilism
url http://jffp.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/jffp/article/view/651
work_keys_str_mv AT kellyoliver kristevasreformation
_version_ 1716784113601478656