Are all types of expertise created equal? Car experts use different spatial frequency scales for subordinate categorization of cars and faces.

A much-debated question in object recognition is whether expertise for faces and expertise for non-face objects utilize common perceptual information. We investigated this issue by assessing the diagnostic information required for different types of expertise. Specifically, we asked whether face cat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Assaf Harel, Shlomo Bentin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3691146?pdf=render
id doaj-5f6529a26c2f4185abcee016ffd027e9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5f6529a26c2f4185abcee016ffd027e92020-11-25T01:55:53ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0186e6702410.1371/journal.pone.0067024Are all types of expertise created equal? Car experts use different spatial frequency scales for subordinate categorization of cars and faces.Assaf HarelShlomo BentinA much-debated question in object recognition is whether expertise for faces and expertise for non-face objects utilize common perceptual information. We investigated this issue by assessing the diagnostic information required for different types of expertise. Specifically, we asked whether face categorization and expert car categorization at the subordinate level relies on the same spatial frequency (SF) scales. Fifteen car experts and fifteen novices performed a category verification task with spatially filtered images of faces, cars, and airplanes. Images were categorized based on their basic (e.g. "car") and subordinate level (e.g. "Japanese car") identity. The effect of expertise was not evident when objects were categorized at the basic level. However, when the car experts categorized faces and cars at the subordinate level, the two types of expertise required different kinds of SF information. Subordinate categorization of faces relied on low SFs more than on high SFs, whereas subordinate expert car categorization relied on high SFs more than on low SFs. These findings suggest that expertise in the recognition of objects and faces do not utilize the same type of information. Rather, different types of expertise require different types of diagnostic visual information.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3691146?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Assaf Harel
Shlomo Bentin
spellingShingle Assaf Harel
Shlomo Bentin
Are all types of expertise created equal? Car experts use different spatial frequency scales for subordinate categorization of cars and faces.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Assaf Harel
Shlomo Bentin
author_sort Assaf Harel
title Are all types of expertise created equal? Car experts use different spatial frequency scales for subordinate categorization of cars and faces.
title_short Are all types of expertise created equal? Car experts use different spatial frequency scales for subordinate categorization of cars and faces.
title_full Are all types of expertise created equal? Car experts use different spatial frequency scales for subordinate categorization of cars and faces.
title_fullStr Are all types of expertise created equal? Car experts use different spatial frequency scales for subordinate categorization of cars and faces.
title_full_unstemmed Are all types of expertise created equal? Car experts use different spatial frequency scales for subordinate categorization of cars and faces.
title_sort are all types of expertise created equal? car experts use different spatial frequency scales for subordinate categorization of cars and faces.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description A much-debated question in object recognition is whether expertise for faces and expertise for non-face objects utilize common perceptual information. We investigated this issue by assessing the diagnostic information required for different types of expertise. Specifically, we asked whether face categorization and expert car categorization at the subordinate level relies on the same spatial frequency (SF) scales. Fifteen car experts and fifteen novices performed a category verification task with spatially filtered images of faces, cars, and airplanes. Images were categorized based on their basic (e.g. "car") and subordinate level (e.g. "Japanese car") identity. The effect of expertise was not evident when objects were categorized at the basic level. However, when the car experts categorized faces and cars at the subordinate level, the two types of expertise required different kinds of SF information. Subordinate categorization of faces relied on low SFs more than on high SFs, whereas subordinate expert car categorization relied on high SFs more than on low SFs. These findings suggest that expertise in the recognition of objects and faces do not utilize the same type of information. Rather, different types of expertise require different types of diagnostic visual information.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3691146?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT assafharel arealltypesofexpertisecreatedequalcarexpertsusedifferentspatialfrequencyscalesforsubordinatecategorizationofcarsandfaces
AT shlomobentin arealltypesofexpertisecreatedequalcarexpertsusedifferentspatialfrequencyscalesforsubordinatecategorizationofcarsandfaces
_version_ 1724982761248260096