Fixation sequences in imagery and in recognition during the processing of pictures of real-world scenes

Thirty photographs of real-world scenes were presented for encoding, and half the participants then performed a recognition test, deciding whether each of 60 images were old (from the original set) or new. The other participants performed an imagery task immediately after encoding each of the 30 ima...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Katherine Humphrey, Geoffrey Underwood
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bern Open Publishing 2008-12-01
Series:Journal of Eye Movement Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://bop.unibe.ch/JEMR/article/view/2261
id doaj-5f5b966ed7ec4578b9274261730b1e6a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5f5b966ed7ec4578b9274261730b1e6a2021-05-28T13:34:50ZengBern Open PublishingJournal of Eye Movement Research1995-86922008-12-012210.16910/jemr.2.2.3Fixation sequences in imagery and in recognition during the processing of pictures of real-world scenesKatherine Humphrey0Geoffrey Underwood1University of NottinghamUniversity of NottinghamThirty photographs of real-world scenes were presented for encoding, and half the participants then performed a recognition test, deciding whether each of 60 images were old (from the original set) or new. The other participants performed an imagery task immediately after encoding each of the 30 images. After completing this task, the recognition group then performed the imagery task in response to prompts that were unique verbal descriptors, and the imagery group performed the recognition task. All participants returned 2 days later, and repeated the imagery test. Eye movements were recorded during all phases. Differences in average fixation duration, average number of fixations and average saccadic amplitude were found between task groups and between experimental phases. Scan patterns were compared with a string-editing algorithm. Close similarities were observed between experimental phases that involved more similar tasks (e.g., initial encoding vs. recognition, and immediate imagery vs. delayed imagery). Scan patterns were equally similar when the task was presented immediately or after 2 days. We propose that the more similar the encoding and retrieval processes are, the more similar eye movements will be at each of these experimental stages.https://bop.unibe.ch/JEMR/article/view/2261eye movementsimageryscan patternvisual buffer
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Katherine Humphrey
Geoffrey Underwood
spellingShingle Katherine Humphrey
Geoffrey Underwood
Fixation sequences in imagery and in recognition during the processing of pictures of real-world scenes
Journal of Eye Movement Research
eye movements
imagery
scan pattern
visual buffer
author_facet Katherine Humphrey
Geoffrey Underwood
author_sort Katherine Humphrey
title Fixation sequences in imagery and in recognition during the processing of pictures of real-world scenes
title_short Fixation sequences in imagery and in recognition during the processing of pictures of real-world scenes
title_full Fixation sequences in imagery and in recognition during the processing of pictures of real-world scenes
title_fullStr Fixation sequences in imagery and in recognition during the processing of pictures of real-world scenes
title_full_unstemmed Fixation sequences in imagery and in recognition during the processing of pictures of real-world scenes
title_sort fixation sequences in imagery and in recognition during the processing of pictures of real-world scenes
publisher Bern Open Publishing
series Journal of Eye Movement Research
issn 1995-8692
publishDate 2008-12-01
description Thirty photographs of real-world scenes were presented for encoding, and half the participants then performed a recognition test, deciding whether each of 60 images were old (from the original set) or new. The other participants performed an imagery task immediately after encoding each of the 30 images. After completing this task, the recognition group then performed the imagery task in response to prompts that were unique verbal descriptors, and the imagery group performed the recognition task. All participants returned 2 days later, and repeated the imagery test. Eye movements were recorded during all phases. Differences in average fixation duration, average number of fixations and average saccadic amplitude were found between task groups and between experimental phases. Scan patterns were compared with a string-editing algorithm. Close similarities were observed between experimental phases that involved more similar tasks (e.g., initial encoding vs. recognition, and immediate imagery vs. delayed imagery). Scan patterns were equally similar when the task was presented immediately or after 2 days. We propose that the more similar the encoding and retrieval processes are, the more similar eye movements will be at each of these experimental stages.
topic eye movements
imagery
scan pattern
visual buffer
url https://bop.unibe.ch/JEMR/article/view/2261
work_keys_str_mv AT katherinehumphrey fixationsequencesinimageryandinrecognitionduringtheprocessingofpicturesofrealworldscenes
AT geoffreyunderwood fixationsequencesinimageryandinrecognitionduringtheprocessingofpicturesofrealworldscenes
_version_ 1721423682746712064