Comparison between bicycle ergometric interval and continuous training in patients early after coronary artery bypass grafting: A prospective, randomized study

Objectives: Continuous and interval training have previously been compared in patients with cardiac diseases. However, data comparing the safety and effectiveness of the two exercise methods are lacking in patients early after coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods: In all, 120 patients were prosp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marco Reer, Sophie Rauschenberg, Kuno Hottenrott, Rene Schwesig, Viktoria Heinze, Dana Huta, Nadja Schwark, Axel Schlitt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-08-01
Series:SAGE Open Medicine
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121211038202
id doaj-5f3d07d77bbf447ebd4290086ef334f4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5f3d07d77bbf447ebd4290086ef334f42021-08-11T04:35:13ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open Medicine2050-31212021-08-01910.1177/20503121211038202Comparison between bicycle ergometric interval and continuous training in patients early after coronary artery bypass grafting: A prospective, randomized studyMarco Reer0Sophie Rauschenberg1Kuno Hottenrott2Rene Schwesig3Viktoria Heinze4Dana Huta5Nadja Schwark6Axel Schlitt7Paracelsus-Harz Clinic, Quedlinburg, GermanyMartin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), GermanyInstitute of Sports Science, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), GermanyDepartment of Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), GermanyParacelsus-Harz Clinic, Quedlinburg, GermanyParacelsus-Harz Clinic, Quedlinburg, GermanyMartin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), GermanyMartin-Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), GermanyObjectives: Continuous and interval training have previously been compared in patients with cardiac diseases. However, data comparing the safety and effectiveness of the two exercise methods are lacking in patients early after coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods: In all, 120 patients were prospectively randomized in a 1:1 fashion approximately 17 days after coronary artery bypass grafting to an interval group or continuous group. All patients participated in bicycle ergometric training six times/week for 20 min each during a 3-week inpatient rehabilitation program. The combined primary endpoint was safety as defined by incidence of scar pain and cardiac events related to the exercise intervention. Secondary outcomes included the effect of the interventions on parameters such as heart rate and peak power output. Results: Four patients (12.1%) in the interval group reported pain on the saphenectomy scar as a result of the training intervention in comparison to six patients (20.0%) in the continuous group (χ 2 (1, n = 63) = 0.73, p = 0.393). No cardiac events were related to exercise intervention. No effect on heart rate was found during the intervention, nor was a difference observed between the groups. Peak power output, as one of the analyzed markers, improved significantly in both groups, but no differences were found between groups. Conclusion: Ergometry training performed as interval or continuous training was safe and effective regarding increase in physical fitness early after coronary artery bypass grafting in an inpatient rehabilitation setting, with no differences observed between the groups.https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121211038202
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marco Reer
Sophie Rauschenberg
Kuno Hottenrott
Rene Schwesig
Viktoria Heinze
Dana Huta
Nadja Schwark
Axel Schlitt
spellingShingle Marco Reer
Sophie Rauschenberg
Kuno Hottenrott
Rene Schwesig
Viktoria Heinze
Dana Huta
Nadja Schwark
Axel Schlitt
Comparison between bicycle ergometric interval and continuous training in patients early after coronary artery bypass grafting: A prospective, randomized study
SAGE Open Medicine
author_facet Marco Reer
Sophie Rauschenberg
Kuno Hottenrott
Rene Schwesig
Viktoria Heinze
Dana Huta
Nadja Schwark
Axel Schlitt
author_sort Marco Reer
title Comparison between bicycle ergometric interval and continuous training in patients early after coronary artery bypass grafting: A prospective, randomized study
title_short Comparison between bicycle ergometric interval and continuous training in patients early after coronary artery bypass grafting: A prospective, randomized study
title_full Comparison between bicycle ergometric interval and continuous training in patients early after coronary artery bypass grafting: A prospective, randomized study
title_fullStr Comparison between bicycle ergometric interval and continuous training in patients early after coronary artery bypass grafting: A prospective, randomized study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between bicycle ergometric interval and continuous training in patients early after coronary artery bypass grafting: A prospective, randomized study
title_sort comparison between bicycle ergometric interval and continuous training in patients early after coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective, randomized study
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open Medicine
issn 2050-3121
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Objectives: Continuous and interval training have previously been compared in patients with cardiac diseases. However, data comparing the safety and effectiveness of the two exercise methods are lacking in patients early after coronary artery bypass grafting. Methods: In all, 120 patients were prospectively randomized in a 1:1 fashion approximately 17 days after coronary artery bypass grafting to an interval group or continuous group. All patients participated in bicycle ergometric training six times/week for 20 min each during a 3-week inpatient rehabilitation program. The combined primary endpoint was safety as defined by incidence of scar pain and cardiac events related to the exercise intervention. Secondary outcomes included the effect of the interventions on parameters such as heart rate and peak power output. Results: Four patients (12.1%) in the interval group reported pain on the saphenectomy scar as a result of the training intervention in comparison to six patients (20.0%) in the continuous group (χ 2 (1, n = 63) = 0.73, p = 0.393). No cardiac events were related to exercise intervention. No effect on heart rate was found during the intervention, nor was a difference observed between the groups. Peak power output, as one of the analyzed markers, improved significantly in both groups, but no differences were found between groups. Conclusion: Ergometry training performed as interval or continuous training was safe and effective regarding increase in physical fitness early after coronary artery bypass grafting in an inpatient rehabilitation setting, with no differences observed between the groups.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121211038202
work_keys_str_mv AT marcoreer comparisonbetweenbicycleergometricintervalandcontinuoustraininginpatientsearlyaftercoronaryarterybypassgraftingaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT sophierauschenberg comparisonbetweenbicycleergometricintervalandcontinuoustraininginpatientsearlyaftercoronaryarterybypassgraftingaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT kunohottenrott comparisonbetweenbicycleergometricintervalandcontinuoustraininginpatientsearlyaftercoronaryarterybypassgraftingaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT reneschwesig comparisonbetweenbicycleergometricintervalandcontinuoustraininginpatientsearlyaftercoronaryarterybypassgraftingaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT viktoriaheinze comparisonbetweenbicycleergometricintervalandcontinuoustraininginpatientsearlyaftercoronaryarterybypassgraftingaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT danahuta comparisonbetweenbicycleergometricintervalandcontinuoustraininginpatientsearlyaftercoronaryarterybypassgraftingaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT nadjaschwark comparisonbetweenbicycleergometricintervalandcontinuoustraininginpatientsearlyaftercoronaryarterybypassgraftingaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT axelschlitt comparisonbetweenbicycleergometricintervalandcontinuoustraininginpatientsearlyaftercoronaryarterybypassgraftingaprospectiverandomizedstudy
_version_ 1721211708700098560