Multidisciplinary working in the management of axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis
Multidisciplinary (MD) care is essential in the management of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) and is one of the main pillars of disease management and patient care. However, evidence supporting the effectiveness and benefits of this strategy in SpA is scarce. In this review we discuss the thre...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X20975888 |
id |
doaj-5f3aaf906f3342f2bd3d1e0beb22e95c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5f3aaf906f3342f2bd3d1e0beb22e95c2021-07-14T10:34:29ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease1759-72182020-12-011210.1177/1759720X20975888Multidisciplinary working in the management of axial and peripheral spondyloarthritisTania GuduDeepak R. JadonMultidisciplinary (MD) care is essential in the management of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) and is one of the main pillars of disease management and patient care. However, evidence supporting the effectiveness and benefits of this strategy in SpA is scarce. In this review we discuss the three types of MD care models: (i) combined clinics (MD units), including ‘face to face’, ‘parallel’ and ‘circuit approach’ clinics; (ii) MD team meetings; (iii) group consultations. The most frequently used model in SpA studies has been the ‘parallel’ combined clinic and usually encompasses a rheumatologist and another specialist, most commonly a dermatologist or a gastroenterologist, that work in tandem according to predefined referral criteria and treatment algorithms. MD working seems to improve the care of patients with SpA by a better identification and diagnosis of the disease, an earlier and more comprehensive treatment approach, and better outcomes for patients in terms of disease activity, physical function, quality of life and patient satisfaction. Nevertheless, challenges remain. Data on effectiveness and feasibility are scarce and are mostly derived from studies with design issues and often without a unidisciplinary care comparator arm. Although patient centricity is one of the core values of patient care and MD setting in SpA, the patient often does not play an active role in most of the MD settings studied or in common clinical practice. Further efforts should be made so that MD care reflects patients’ expectations and needs. Overcoming these limits will help to implement successfully SpA MD care in daily clinical practice and subsequently to achieve a higher quality of care for our patients.https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X20975888 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Tania Gudu Deepak R. Jadon |
spellingShingle |
Tania Gudu Deepak R. Jadon Multidisciplinary working in the management of axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease |
author_facet |
Tania Gudu Deepak R. Jadon |
author_sort |
Tania Gudu |
title |
Multidisciplinary working in the management of axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis |
title_short |
Multidisciplinary working in the management of axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis |
title_full |
Multidisciplinary working in the management of axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis |
title_fullStr |
Multidisciplinary working in the management of axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Multidisciplinary working in the management of axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis |
title_sort |
multidisciplinary working in the management of axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease |
issn |
1759-7218 |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
Multidisciplinary (MD) care is essential in the management of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) and is one of the main pillars of disease management and patient care. However, evidence supporting the effectiveness and benefits of this strategy in SpA is scarce. In this review we discuss the three types of MD care models: (i) combined clinics (MD units), including ‘face to face’, ‘parallel’ and ‘circuit approach’ clinics; (ii) MD team meetings; (iii) group consultations. The most frequently used model in SpA studies has been the ‘parallel’ combined clinic and usually encompasses a rheumatologist and another specialist, most commonly a dermatologist or a gastroenterologist, that work in tandem according to predefined referral criteria and treatment algorithms. MD working seems to improve the care of patients with SpA by a better identification and diagnosis of the disease, an earlier and more comprehensive treatment approach, and better outcomes for patients in terms of disease activity, physical function, quality of life and patient satisfaction. Nevertheless, challenges remain. Data on effectiveness and feasibility are scarce and are mostly derived from studies with design issues and often without a unidisciplinary care comparator arm. Although patient centricity is one of the core values of patient care and MD setting in SpA, the patient often does not play an active role in most of the MD settings studied or in common clinical practice. Further efforts should be made so that MD care reflects patients’ expectations and needs. Overcoming these limits will help to implement successfully SpA MD care in daily clinical practice and subsequently to achieve a higher quality of care for our patients. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X20975888 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT taniagudu multidisciplinaryworkinginthemanagementofaxialandperipheralspondyloarthritis AT deepakrjadon multidisciplinaryworkinginthemanagementofaxialandperipheralspondyloarthritis |
_version_ |
1721303061911044096 |