Multidisciplinary working in the management of axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis

Multidisciplinary (MD) care is essential in the management of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) and is one of the main pillars of disease management and patient care. However, evidence supporting the effectiveness and benefits of this strategy in SpA is scarce. In this review we discuss the thre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tania Gudu, Deepak R. Jadon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2020-12-01
Series:Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X20975888
id doaj-5f3aaf906f3342f2bd3d1e0beb22e95c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5f3aaf906f3342f2bd3d1e0beb22e95c2021-07-14T10:34:29ZengSAGE PublishingTherapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease1759-72182020-12-011210.1177/1759720X20975888Multidisciplinary working in the management of axial and peripheral spondyloarthritisTania GuduDeepak R. JadonMultidisciplinary (MD) care is essential in the management of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) and is one of the main pillars of disease management and patient care. However, evidence supporting the effectiveness and benefits of this strategy in SpA is scarce. In this review we discuss the three types of MD care models: (i) combined clinics (MD units), including ‘face to face’, ‘parallel’ and ‘circuit approach’ clinics; (ii) MD team meetings; (iii) group consultations. The most frequently used model in SpA studies has been the ‘parallel’ combined clinic and usually encompasses a rheumatologist and another specialist, most commonly a dermatologist or a gastroenterologist, that work in tandem according to predefined referral criteria and treatment algorithms. MD working seems to improve the care of patients with SpA by a better identification and diagnosis of the disease, an earlier and more comprehensive treatment approach, and better outcomes for patients in terms of disease activity, physical function, quality of life and patient satisfaction. Nevertheless, challenges remain. Data on effectiveness and feasibility are scarce and are mostly derived from studies with design issues and often without a unidisciplinary care comparator arm. Although patient centricity is one of the core values of patient care and MD setting in SpA, the patient often does not play an active role in most of the MD settings studied or in common clinical practice. Further efforts should be made so that MD care reflects patients’ expectations and needs. Overcoming these limits will help to implement successfully SpA MD care in daily clinical practice and subsequently to achieve a higher quality of care for our patients.https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X20975888
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tania Gudu
Deepak R. Jadon
spellingShingle Tania Gudu
Deepak R. Jadon
Multidisciplinary working in the management of axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis
Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease
author_facet Tania Gudu
Deepak R. Jadon
author_sort Tania Gudu
title Multidisciplinary working in the management of axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis
title_short Multidisciplinary working in the management of axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis
title_full Multidisciplinary working in the management of axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis
title_fullStr Multidisciplinary working in the management of axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis
title_full_unstemmed Multidisciplinary working in the management of axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis
title_sort multidisciplinary working in the management of axial and peripheral spondyloarthritis
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Therapeutic Advances in Musculoskeletal Disease
issn 1759-7218
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Multidisciplinary (MD) care is essential in the management of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) and is one of the main pillars of disease management and patient care. However, evidence supporting the effectiveness and benefits of this strategy in SpA is scarce. In this review we discuss the three types of MD care models: (i) combined clinics (MD units), including ‘face to face’, ‘parallel’ and ‘circuit approach’ clinics; (ii) MD team meetings; (iii) group consultations. The most frequently used model in SpA studies has been the ‘parallel’ combined clinic and usually encompasses a rheumatologist and another specialist, most commonly a dermatologist or a gastroenterologist, that work in tandem according to predefined referral criteria and treatment algorithms. MD working seems to improve the care of patients with SpA by a better identification and diagnosis of the disease, an earlier and more comprehensive treatment approach, and better outcomes for patients in terms of disease activity, physical function, quality of life and patient satisfaction. Nevertheless, challenges remain. Data on effectiveness and feasibility are scarce and are mostly derived from studies with design issues and often without a unidisciplinary care comparator arm. Although patient centricity is one of the core values of patient care and MD setting in SpA, the patient often does not play an active role in most of the MD settings studied or in common clinical practice. Further efforts should be made so that MD care reflects patients’ expectations and needs. Overcoming these limits will help to implement successfully SpA MD care in daily clinical practice and subsequently to achieve a higher quality of care for our patients.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X20975888
work_keys_str_mv AT taniagudu multidisciplinaryworkinginthemanagementofaxialandperipheralspondyloarthritis
AT deepakrjadon multidisciplinaryworkinginthemanagementofaxialandperipheralspondyloarthritis
_version_ 1721303061911044096