Is visual estimation of passive range of motion in the pediatric lower limb valid and reliable

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Visual estimation (VE) is an essential tool for evaluation of range of motion. Few papers discussed its validity in children orthopedics' practice. The purpose of our study was to assess validity and reliability of VE for passiv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dagher Fernand, El Hage Samer, Kalouche Ibrahim, Ghanem Ismat, Rachkidi Rami, Kharrat Khalil
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-10-01
Series:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/126
id doaj-5f308bda4ea24b03b9e4aca9c7079910
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5f308bda4ea24b03b9e4aca9c70799102020-11-24T21:53:05ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742009-10-0110112610.1186/1471-2474-10-126Is visual estimation of passive range of motion in the pediatric lower limb valid and reliableDagher FernandEl Hage SamerKalouche IbrahimGhanem IsmatRachkidi RamiKharrat Khalil<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Visual estimation (VE) is an essential tool for evaluation of range of motion. Few papers discussed its validity in children orthopedics' practice. The purpose of our study was to assess validity and reliability of VE for passive range of motions (PROMs) of children's lower limbs.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Fifty typically developing children (100 lower limbs) were examined. Visual estimations for PROMs of hip (flexion, adduction, abduction, internal and external rotations), knee (flexion and popliteal angle) and ankle (dorsiflexion and plantarflexion) were made by a pediatric orthopaedic surgeon (POS) and a 5<sup>th </sup>year resident in orthopaedics. A last year medical student did goniometric measurements. Three weeks later, same measurements were performed to assess reliability of visual estimation for each examiner.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Visual estimations of the POS were highly reliable for hip flexion, hip rotations and popliteal angle (ρ<sub>c </sub>≥ 0.8). Reliability was good for hip abduction, knee flexion, ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion (ρ<sub>c </sub>≥ 0.7) but poor for hip adduction (ρ<sub>c </sub>= 0.5). Reproducibility for all PROMs was verified. Resident's VE showed high reliability (ρ<sub>c </sub>≥ 0.8) for hip flexion and popliteal angle. Good correlation was found for hip rotations and knee flexion (ρ<sub>c </sub>≥ 0.7). Poor results were obtained for ankle PROMs (ρ<sub>c </sub>< 0.6) as well as hip adduction and abduction, the results of which not being reproducible. Influence of experience was clearly demonstrated for PROMs of hip rotations, adduction and abduction as well as ankle plantarflexion.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Accuracy of VE of passive hip flexion and knee PROMs is high regardless of the examiner's experience. Same accuracy can be found for hip rotations and abduction whenever VE is performed by an experienced examiner. Goniometric evaluation is recommended for passive hip adduction and for ankle PROMs.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/126
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dagher Fernand
El Hage Samer
Kalouche Ibrahim
Ghanem Ismat
Rachkidi Rami
Kharrat Khalil
spellingShingle Dagher Fernand
El Hage Samer
Kalouche Ibrahim
Ghanem Ismat
Rachkidi Rami
Kharrat Khalil
Is visual estimation of passive range of motion in the pediatric lower limb valid and reliable
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
author_facet Dagher Fernand
El Hage Samer
Kalouche Ibrahim
Ghanem Ismat
Rachkidi Rami
Kharrat Khalil
author_sort Dagher Fernand
title Is visual estimation of passive range of motion in the pediatric lower limb valid and reliable
title_short Is visual estimation of passive range of motion in the pediatric lower limb valid and reliable
title_full Is visual estimation of passive range of motion in the pediatric lower limb valid and reliable
title_fullStr Is visual estimation of passive range of motion in the pediatric lower limb valid and reliable
title_full_unstemmed Is visual estimation of passive range of motion in the pediatric lower limb valid and reliable
title_sort is visual estimation of passive range of motion in the pediatric lower limb valid and reliable
publisher BMC
series BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
issn 1471-2474
publishDate 2009-10-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Visual estimation (VE) is an essential tool for evaluation of range of motion. Few papers discussed its validity in children orthopedics' practice. The purpose of our study was to assess validity and reliability of VE for passive range of motions (PROMs) of children's lower limbs.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Fifty typically developing children (100 lower limbs) were examined. Visual estimations for PROMs of hip (flexion, adduction, abduction, internal and external rotations), knee (flexion and popliteal angle) and ankle (dorsiflexion and plantarflexion) were made by a pediatric orthopaedic surgeon (POS) and a 5<sup>th </sup>year resident in orthopaedics. A last year medical student did goniometric measurements. Three weeks later, same measurements were performed to assess reliability of visual estimation for each examiner.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Visual estimations of the POS were highly reliable for hip flexion, hip rotations and popliteal angle (ρ<sub>c </sub>≥ 0.8). Reliability was good for hip abduction, knee flexion, ankle dorsiflexion and plantarflexion (ρ<sub>c </sub>≥ 0.7) but poor for hip adduction (ρ<sub>c </sub>= 0.5). Reproducibility for all PROMs was verified. Resident's VE showed high reliability (ρ<sub>c </sub>≥ 0.8) for hip flexion and popliteal angle. Good correlation was found for hip rotations and knee flexion (ρ<sub>c </sub>≥ 0.7). Poor results were obtained for ankle PROMs (ρ<sub>c </sub>< 0.6) as well as hip adduction and abduction, the results of which not being reproducible. Influence of experience was clearly demonstrated for PROMs of hip rotations, adduction and abduction as well as ankle plantarflexion.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Accuracy of VE of passive hip flexion and knee PROMs is high regardless of the examiner's experience. Same accuracy can be found for hip rotations and abduction whenever VE is performed by an experienced examiner. Goniometric evaluation is recommended for passive hip adduction and for ankle PROMs.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/10/126
work_keys_str_mv AT dagherfernand isvisualestimationofpassiverangeofmotioninthepediatriclowerlimbvalidandreliable
AT elhagesamer isvisualestimationofpassiverangeofmotioninthepediatriclowerlimbvalidandreliable
AT kaloucheibrahim isvisualestimationofpassiverangeofmotioninthepediatriclowerlimbvalidandreliable
AT ghanemismat isvisualestimationofpassiverangeofmotioninthepediatriclowerlimbvalidandreliable
AT rachkidirami isvisualestimationofpassiverangeofmotioninthepediatriclowerlimbvalidandreliable
AT kharratkhalil isvisualestimationofpassiverangeofmotioninthepediatriclowerlimbvalidandreliable
_version_ 1725872928288931840