Regulation’s influence on EU banking efficiency: An evaluation post crisis

This paper examines the impact of regulatory policies on banking market efficiency using a sample of 678 commercial banks from 21 European Union countries for the post-crisis year 2010, controlling for bank-specific and country-specific variables. Data on regulation, supervision and monitoring varia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Edward Bace, Ana Ferreira
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2020-01-01
Series:Cogent Economics & Finance
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2020.1838735
id doaj-5f1f476686cb4caab584f0bb7088e871
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5f1f476686cb4caab584f0bb7088e8712021-06-02T10:12:14ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Economics & Finance2332-20392020-01-018110.1080/23322039.2020.18387351838735Regulation’s influence on EU banking efficiency: An evaluation post crisisEdward Bace0Ana Ferreira1Middlesex UniversityMiddlesex UniversityThis paper examines the impact of regulatory policies on banking market efficiency using a sample of 678 commercial banks from 21 European Union countries for the post-crisis year 2010, controlling for bank-specific and country-specific variables. Data on regulation, supervision and monitoring variables, and activity restrictions are from the most recent Bank Regulation and Supervision Survey database conducted by the World Bank, published 2012. Besides these we incorporate bank size, equity, market share, government ownership, and growth of Gross Domestic Product per capita, employing an Ordinary Least Squares method. Focus is on two alternative measures of banking market efficiency: net interest margin and overhead costs (operating expenses to assets). Elevated levels of these two ratios should indicate a low level of banking efficiency. The evidence suggests that the link between capital regulation and banking efficiency is not robust enough to control for other regulatory variables. Results confirm that activity restrictions have a negative and significant impact on banking efficiency. Policies encouraging official supervisory power do not enhance efficiency of the banking sector. The only approach positively and statistically significantly associated with efficiency is private monitoring. This leads to the suggestion that government regulation and supervision should be more focused on promoting transparency of information.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2020.1838735bankingefficiencyregulationeuropean union
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Edward Bace
Ana Ferreira
spellingShingle Edward Bace
Ana Ferreira
Regulation’s influence on EU banking efficiency: An evaluation post crisis
Cogent Economics & Finance
banking
efficiency
regulation
european union
author_facet Edward Bace
Ana Ferreira
author_sort Edward Bace
title Regulation’s influence on EU banking efficiency: An evaluation post crisis
title_short Regulation’s influence on EU banking efficiency: An evaluation post crisis
title_full Regulation’s influence on EU banking efficiency: An evaluation post crisis
title_fullStr Regulation’s influence on EU banking efficiency: An evaluation post crisis
title_full_unstemmed Regulation’s influence on EU banking efficiency: An evaluation post crisis
title_sort regulation’s influence on eu banking efficiency: an evaluation post crisis
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Cogent Economics & Finance
issn 2332-2039
publishDate 2020-01-01
description This paper examines the impact of regulatory policies on banking market efficiency using a sample of 678 commercial banks from 21 European Union countries for the post-crisis year 2010, controlling for bank-specific and country-specific variables. Data on regulation, supervision and monitoring variables, and activity restrictions are from the most recent Bank Regulation and Supervision Survey database conducted by the World Bank, published 2012. Besides these we incorporate bank size, equity, market share, government ownership, and growth of Gross Domestic Product per capita, employing an Ordinary Least Squares method. Focus is on two alternative measures of banking market efficiency: net interest margin and overhead costs (operating expenses to assets). Elevated levels of these two ratios should indicate a low level of banking efficiency. The evidence suggests that the link between capital regulation and banking efficiency is not robust enough to control for other regulatory variables. Results confirm that activity restrictions have a negative and significant impact on banking efficiency. Policies encouraging official supervisory power do not enhance efficiency of the banking sector. The only approach positively and statistically significantly associated with efficiency is private monitoring. This leads to the suggestion that government regulation and supervision should be more focused on promoting transparency of information.
topic banking
efficiency
regulation
european union
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2020.1838735
work_keys_str_mv AT edwardbace regulationsinfluenceoneubankingefficiencyanevaluationpostcrisis
AT anaferreira regulationsinfluenceoneubankingefficiencyanevaluationpostcrisis
_version_ 1721405186621046784