Evaluation of the Quality of Reporting of Observational Studies in Otorhinolaryngology - Based on the STROBE Statement.
Observational studies are the most frequently published studies in literature. When randomized controlled trials cannot be conducted because of ethical or practical considerations, an observational study design is the first choice. The STROBE Statement (STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational s...
Main Authors: | Martine Hendriksma, Michiel H M A Joosten, Jeroen P M Peters, Wilko Grolman, Inge Stegeman |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2017-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5217955?pdf=render |
Similar Items
-
Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Otorhinolaryngologic Articles Based on the PRISMA Statement.
by: Jeroen P M Peters, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01) -
Assessment of the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials in otorhinolaryngologic literature - adherence to the CONSORT statement.
by: Jeroen P M Peters, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01) -
Observational research and the STROBE statement
by: Mary Bravo-Peña, et al.
Published: (2014-12-01) -
Observational research and the STROBE statement
by: Mary Bravo-Peña, et al.
Published: (2014-12-01) -
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology-Nutritional Epidemiology (STROBE-nut): An Extension of the STROBE Statement.
by: Carl Lachat, et al.
Published: (2016-06-01)