The Dam Industry, the World Commission on Dams and the HSAF Process

Most actors of the global dam industry primarily operate within their national borders, and are either controlled by or do most of their business with the state. Because of this, the dam industry was slow to respond to the creation of the World Commission on Dams (WCD), and did not provide coordinat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Peter Bosshard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Water Alternatives Association 2010-06-01
Series:Water Alternatives
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol3/v3issue2/82-a3-2-5/file
id doaj-5f0e3fb259e64f9786a73082527cad7d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5f0e3fb259e64f9786a73082527cad7d2020-11-25T01:06:02ZengWater Alternatives AssociationWater Alternatives1965-01751965-01752010-06-01325870The Dam Industry, the World Commission on Dams and the HSAF ProcessPeter Bosshard0International Rivers, Berkeley, CA, USAMost actors of the global dam industry primarily operate within their national borders, and are either controlled by or do most of their business with the state. Because of this, the dam industry was slow to respond to the creation of the World Commission on Dams (WCD), and did not provide coordinated inputs into the WCD process. The hydropower industry is the part of the dam industry which is most directly affected by international policy developments. Not surprisingly, the hydropower sector provided the most systematic response to the WCD report among all industry actors, initially through a defensive reaction and subsequently through the creation of the Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Forum. While the hydropower industry was largely united in its rejection of the policy principles put forward by the WCD, its proactive approach has been beset by divisions and contradictions. While some industry actors are trying to strengthen the environmental norms which are being applied in the sector, others do not see a need for this. Trying to balance such diverging views, the hydropower industry would like to establish norms that can create predictability through the certification of projects. Yet it is not prepared to accept binding minimum standards which would confer new obligations to the hydropower industry.http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol3/v3issue2/82-a3-2-5/fileHydropowerdamscivil societyWorld Commission on Dams (WCD)International Hydropower Association (IHA)Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Forum (HSAF)
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter Bosshard
spellingShingle Peter Bosshard
The Dam Industry, the World Commission on Dams and the HSAF Process
Water Alternatives
Hydropower
dams
civil society
World Commission on Dams (WCD)
International Hydropower Association (IHA)
Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Forum (HSAF)
author_facet Peter Bosshard
author_sort Peter Bosshard
title The Dam Industry, the World Commission on Dams and the HSAF Process
title_short The Dam Industry, the World Commission on Dams and the HSAF Process
title_full The Dam Industry, the World Commission on Dams and the HSAF Process
title_fullStr The Dam Industry, the World Commission on Dams and the HSAF Process
title_full_unstemmed The Dam Industry, the World Commission on Dams and the HSAF Process
title_sort dam industry, the world commission on dams and the hsaf process
publisher Water Alternatives Association
series Water Alternatives
issn 1965-0175
1965-0175
publishDate 2010-06-01
description Most actors of the global dam industry primarily operate within their national borders, and are either controlled by or do most of their business with the state. Because of this, the dam industry was slow to respond to the creation of the World Commission on Dams (WCD), and did not provide coordinated inputs into the WCD process. The hydropower industry is the part of the dam industry which is most directly affected by international policy developments. Not surprisingly, the hydropower sector provided the most systematic response to the WCD report among all industry actors, initially through a defensive reaction and subsequently through the creation of the Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Forum. While the hydropower industry was largely united in its rejection of the policy principles put forward by the WCD, its proactive approach has been beset by divisions and contradictions. While some industry actors are trying to strengthen the environmental norms which are being applied in the sector, others do not see a need for this. Trying to balance such diverging views, the hydropower industry would like to establish norms that can create predictability through the certification of projects. Yet it is not prepared to accept binding minimum standards which would confer new obligations to the hydropower industry.
topic Hydropower
dams
civil society
World Commission on Dams (WCD)
International Hydropower Association (IHA)
Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Forum (HSAF)
url http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol3/v3issue2/82-a3-2-5/file
work_keys_str_mv AT peterbosshard thedamindustrytheworldcommissionondamsandthehsafprocess
AT peterbosshard damindustrytheworldcommissionondamsandthehsafprocess
_version_ 1725191954798477312