The Dam Industry, the World Commission on Dams and the HSAF Process
Most actors of the global dam industry primarily operate within their national borders, and are either controlled by or do most of their business with the state. Because of this, the dam industry was slow to respond to the creation of the World Commission on Dams (WCD), and did not provide coordinat...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Water Alternatives Association
2010-06-01
|
Series: | Water Alternatives |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol3/v3issue2/82-a3-2-5/file |
id |
doaj-5f0e3fb259e64f9786a73082527cad7d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5f0e3fb259e64f9786a73082527cad7d2020-11-25T01:06:02ZengWater Alternatives AssociationWater Alternatives1965-01751965-01752010-06-01325870The Dam Industry, the World Commission on Dams and the HSAF ProcessPeter Bosshard0International Rivers, Berkeley, CA, USAMost actors of the global dam industry primarily operate within their national borders, and are either controlled by or do most of their business with the state. Because of this, the dam industry was slow to respond to the creation of the World Commission on Dams (WCD), and did not provide coordinated inputs into the WCD process. The hydropower industry is the part of the dam industry which is most directly affected by international policy developments. Not surprisingly, the hydropower sector provided the most systematic response to the WCD report among all industry actors, initially through a defensive reaction and subsequently through the creation of the Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Forum. While the hydropower industry was largely united in its rejection of the policy principles put forward by the WCD, its proactive approach has been beset by divisions and contradictions. While some industry actors are trying to strengthen the environmental norms which are being applied in the sector, others do not see a need for this. Trying to balance such diverging views, the hydropower industry would like to establish norms that can create predictability through the certification of projects. Yet it is not prepared to accept binding minimum standards which would confer new obligations to the hydropower industry.http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol3/v3issue2/82-a3-2-5/fileHydropowerdamscivil societyWorld Commission on Dams (WCD)International Hydropower Association (IHA)Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Forum (HSAF) |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Peter Bosshard |
spellingShingle |
Peter Bosshard The Dam Industry, the World Commission on Dams and the HSAF Process Water Alternatives Hydropower dams civil society World Commission on Dams (WCD) International Hydropower Association (IHA) Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Forum (HSAF) |
author_facet |
Peter Bosshard |
author_sort |
Peter Bosshard |
title |
The Dam Industry, the World Commission on Dams and the HSAF Process |
title_short |
The Dam Industry, the World Commission on Dams and the HSAF Process |
title_full |
The Dam Industry, the World Commission on Dams and the HSAF Process |
title_fullStr |
The Dam Industry, the World Commission on Dams and the HSAF Process |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Dam Industry, the World Commission on Dams and the HSAF Process |
title_sort |
dam industry, the world commission on dams and the hsaf process |
publisher |
Water Alternatives Association |
series |
Water Alternatives |
issn |
1965-0175 1965-0175 |
publishDate |
2010-06-01 |
description |
Most actors of the global dam industry primarily operate within their national borders, and are either controlled by or do most of their business with the state. Because of this, the dam industry was slow to respond to the creation of the World Commission on Dams (WCD), and did not provide coordinated inputs into the WCD process. The hydropower industry is the part of the dam industry which is most directly affected by international policy developments. Not surprisingly, the hydropower sector provided the most systematic response to the WCD report among all industry actors, initially through a defensive reaction and subsequently through the creation of the Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Forum.
While the hydropower industry was largely united in its rejection of the policy principles put forward by the WCD, its proactive approach has been beset by divisions and contradictions. While some industry actors are trying to strengthen the environmental norms which are being applied in the sector, others do not see a need for this. Trying to balance such diverging views, the hydropower industry would like to establish norms that can create predictability through the certification of projects. Yet it is not prepared to accept binding minimum standards which would confer new obligations to the hydropower industry. |
topic |
Hydropower dams civil society World Commission on Dams (WCD) International Hydropower Association (IHA) Hydropower Sustainability Assessment Forum (HSAF) |
url |
http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol3/v3issue2/82-a3-2-5/file |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT peterbosshard thedamindustrytheworldcommissionondamsandthehsafprocess AT peterbosshard damindustrytheworldcommissionondamsandthehsafprocess |
_version_ |
1725191954798477312 |