The place of language among sign systems: Juri Lotman and Émile Benveniste

This paper seeks to shed light on an unwritten chapter in the history of Tartu semiotics, that is, to draw a parallel between Juri Lotman and Émile Benveniste on the status of natural language among other systems of signs. The tenet that language works as a ‘primary modelling system’ represents one...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Remo Gramigna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Tartu Press 2013-11-01
Series:Sign Systems Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/15654
id doaj-5f05d0a48b5e4ca4847c479e9e6e9472
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5f05d0a48b5e4ca4847c479e9e6e94722021-04-02T12:55:57ZengUniversity of Tartu PressSign Systems Studies1406-42431736-74092013-11-01412/310.12697/SSS.2013.41.2-3.10The place of language among sign systems: Juri Lotman and Émile BenvenisteRemo Gramigna0Department of Semiotics, University of TartuThis paper seeks to shed light on an unwritten chapter in the history of Tartu semiotics, that is, to draw a parallel between Juri Lotman and Émile Benveniste on the status of natural language among other systems of signs. The tenet that language works as a ‘primary modelling system’ represents one of the trademarks of the Tartu-Moscow school. For Lotman, the primacy assigned to natural language in respect to other systems of signs lied in the fact that the former functions as a ‘model’ for the latter thus regarded as ‘secondary modelling systems’. Yet how does language carry out its function of being a model for other sign systems? Is language the only primary modelling system? This paper seeks to foster the abovementioned claim of the primacy of natural language and argues that this issue deserves a closer inspection. In order to follow this route, it suggests a parallel between Lotman and Benveniste arguing that there exist several points in common that lead to a convergence of positions between these two remarkable scholars. The paper explores such a possibility, arguing that Lotman’s and Benveniste’s positions open up an interesting debate with specific reference to the relations laid down between language and other system of signs.https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/15654primary and secondary modelling systemsnatural languageJuri LotmanÉmile Benvenistemetalinguistic faculty of language
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Remo Gramigna
spellingShingle Remo Gramigna
The place of language among sign systems: Juri Lotman and Émile Benveniste
Sign Systems Studies
primary and secondary modelling systems
natural language
Juri Lotman
Émile Benveniste
metalinguistic faculty of language
author_facet Remo Gramigna
author_sort Remo Gramigna
title The place of language among sign systems: Juri Lotman and Émile Benveniste
title_short The place of language among sign systems: Juri Lotman and Émile Benveniste
title_full The place of language among sign systems: Juri Lotman and Émile Benveniste
title_fullStr The place of language among sign systems: Juri Lotman and Émile Benveniste
title_full_unstemmed The place of language among sign systems: Juri Lotman and Émile Benveniste
title_sort place of language among sign systems: juri lotman and émile benveniste
publisher University of Tartu Press
series Sign Systems Studies
issn 1406-4243
1736-7409
publishDate 2013-11-01
description This paper seeks to shed light on an unwritten chapter in the history of Tartu semiotics, that is, to draw a parallel between Juri Lotman and Émile Benveniste on the status of natural language among other systems of signs. The tenet that language works as a ‘primary modelling system’ represents one of the trademarks of the Tartu-Moscow school. For Lotman, the primacy assigned to natural language in respect to other systems of signs lied in the fact that the former functions as a ‘model’ for the latter thus regarded as ‘secondary modelling systems’. Yet how does language carry out its function of being a model for other sign systems? Is language the only primary modelling system? This paper seeks to foster the abovementioned claim of the primacy of natural language and argues that this issue deserves a closer inspection. In order to follow this route, it suggests a parallel between Lotman and Benveniste arguing that there exist several points in common that lead to a convergence of positions between these two remarkable scholars. The paper explores such a possibility, arguing that Lotman’s and Benveniste’s positions open up an interesting debate with specific reference to the relations laid down between language and other system of signs.
topic primary and secondary modelling systems
natural language
Juri Lotman
Émile Benveniste
metalinguistic faculty of language
url https://ojs.utlib.ee/index.php/sss/article/view/15654
work_keys_str_mv AT remogramigna theplaceoflanguageamongsignsystemsjurilotmanandemilebenveniste
AT remogramigna placeoflanguageamongsignsystemsjurilotmanandemilebenveniste
_version_ 1721567071565774848