The Comparison of the Classical Keplerian Orbit Elements, Non-Singular Orbital Elements (Equinoctial Elements), and the Cartesian State Variables in Lagrange Planetary Equations with J2 Perturbation: Part I
Two semi-analytic solutions for a perturbed two-body problem known as Lagrange planetary equations (LPE) were compared to a numerical integration of the equation of motion with same perturbation force. To avoid the critical conditions inherited from the configuration of LPE, non-singular orbital e...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Korean Space Science Society (KSSS)
2011-03-01
|
Series: | Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ocean.kisti.re.kr/downfile/volume/kosss/OJOOBS/2011/v28n1/OJOOBS_2011_v28n1_37.pdf |
id |
doaj-5f041e19eace4059939dd12502320549 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5f041e19eace4059939dd125023205492020-11-24T23:17:15ZengKorean Space Science Society (KSSS)Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences2093-55872093-14092011-03-01281375410.5140/JASS.2011.28.1.037The Comparison of the Classical Keplerian Orbit Elements, Non-Singular Orbital Elements (Equinoctial Elements), and the Cartesian State Variables in Lagrange Planetary Equations with J2 Perturbation: Part IJung Hyun Jo0In Kwan Park1Nammi Choe2Mansoo Choi3Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, Daejeon 305-348, KoreaKorea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, Daejeon 305-348, KoreaKorea Aerospace Research Institute, Daejeon 305-333, KoreaKorea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, Daejeon 305-348, KoreaTwo semi-analytic solutions for a perturbed two-body problem known as Lagrange planetary equations (LPE) were compared to a numerical integration of the equation of motion with same perturbation force. To avoid the critical conditions inherited from the configuration of LPE, non-singular orbital elements (EOE) had been introduced. In this study, two types of orbital elements, classical Keplerian orbital elements (COE) and EOE were used for the solution of the LPE. The effectiveness of EOE and the discrepancy between EOE and COE were investigated by using several near critical conditions. The near one revolution, one day, and seven days evolutions of each orbital element described in LPE with COE and EOE were analyzed by comparing it with the directly converted orbital elements from the numerically integrated state vector in Cartesian coordinate. As a result, LPE with EOE has an advantage in long term calculation over LPE with COE in case of relatively small eccentricity.http://ocean.kisti.re.kr/downfile/volume/kosss/OJOOBS/2011/v28n1/OJOOBS_2011_v28n1_37.pdfLagrange planetary equationequinoctial elementsJ2 perturbation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jung Hyun Jo In Kwan Park Nammi Choe Mansoo Choi |
spellingShingle |
Jung Hyun Jo In Kwan Park Nammi Choe Mansoo Choi The Comparison of the Classical Keplerian Orbit Elements, Non-Singular Orbital Elements (Equinoctial Elements), and the Cartesian State Variables in Lagrange Planetary Equations with J2 Perturbation: Part I Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences Lagrange planetary equation equinoctial elements J2 perturbation |
author_facet |
Jung Hyun Jo In Kwan Park Nammi Choe Mansoo Choi |
author_sort |
Jung Hyun Jo |
title |
The Comparison of the Classical Keplerian Orbit Elements, Non-Singular Orbital Elements (Equinoctial Elements), and the Cartesian State Variables in Lagrange Planetary Equations with J2 Perturbation: Part I |
title_short |
The Comparison of the Classical Keplerian Orbit Elements, Non-Singular Orbital Elements (Equinoctial Elements), and the Cartesian State Variables in Lagrange Planetary Equations with J2 Perturbation: Part I |
title_full |
The Comparison of the Classical Keplerian Orbit Elements, Non-Singular Orbital Elements (Equinoctial Elements), and the Cartesian State Variables in Lagrange Planetary Equations with J2 Perturbation: Part I |
title_fullStr |
The Comparison of the Classical Keplerian Orbit Elements, Non-Singular Orbital Elements (Equinoctial Elements), and the Cartesian State Variables in Lagrange Planetary Equations with J2 Perturbation: Part I |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Comparison of the Classical Keplerian Orbit Elements, Non-Singular Orbital Elements (Equinoctial Elements), and the Cartesian State Variables in Lagrange Planetary Equations with J2 Perturbation: Part I |
title_sort |
comparison of the classical keplerian orbit elements, non-singular orbital elements (equinoctial elements), and the cartesian state variables in lagrange planetary equations with j2 perturbation: part i |
publisher |
Korean Space Science Society (KSSS) |
series |
Journal of Astronomy and Space Sciences |
issn |
2093-5587 2093-1409 |
publishDate |
2011-03-01 |
description |
Two semi-analytic solutions for a perturbed two-body problem known as Lagrange planetary equations (LPE) were compared
to a numerical integration of the equation of motion with same perturbation force. To avoid the critical conditions
inherited from the configuration of LPE, non-singular orbital elements (EOE) had been introduced. In this study, two
types of orbital elements, classical Keplerian orbital elements (COE) and EOE were used for the solution of the LPE. The
effectiveness of EOE and the discrepancy between EOE and COE were investigated by using several near critical conditions.
The near one revolution, one day, and seven days evolutions of each orbital element described in LPE with COE
and EOE were analyzed by comparing it with the directly converted orbital elements from the numerically integrated
state vector in Cartesian coordinate. As a result, LPE with EOE has an advantage in long term calculation over LPE with
COE in case of relatively small eccentricity. |
topic |
Lagrange planetary equation equinoctial elements J2 perturbation |
url |
http://ocean.kisti.re.kr/downfile/volume/kosss/OJOOBS/2011/v28n1/OJOOBS_2011_v28n1_37.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT junghyunjo thecomparisonoftheclassicalkeplerianorbitelementsnonsingularorbitalelementsequinoctialelementsandthecartesianstatevariablesinlagrangeplanetaryequationswithj2perturbationparti AT inkwanpark thecomparisonoftheclassicalkeplerianorbitelementsnonsingularorbitalelementsequinoctialelementsandthecartesianstatevariablesinlagrangeplanetaryequationswithj2perturbationparti AT nammichoe thecomparisonoftheclassicalkeplerianorbitelementsnonsingularorbitalelementsequinoctialelementsandthecartesianstatevariablesinlagrangeplanetaryequationswithj2perturbationparti AT mansoochoi thecomparisonoftheclassicalkeplerianorbitelementsnonsingularorbitalelementsequinoctialelementsandthecartesianstatevariablesinlagrangeplanetaryequationswithj2perturbationparti AT junghyunjo comparisonoftheclassicalkeplerianorbitelementsnonsingularorbitalelementsequinoctialelementsandthecartesianstatevariablesinlagrangeplanetaryequationswithj2perturbationparti AT inkwanpark comparisonoftheclassicalkeplerianorbitelementsnonsingularorbitalelementsequinoctialelementsandthecartesianstatevariablesinlagrangeplanetaryequationswithj2perturbationparti AT nammichoe comparisonoftheclassicalkeplerianorbitelementsnonsingularorbitalelementsequinoctialelementsandthecartesianstatevariablesinlagrangeplanetaryequationswithj2perturbationparti AT mansoochoi comparisonoftheclassicalkeplerianorbitelementsnonsingularorbitalelementsequinoctialelementsandthecartesianstatevariablesinlagrangeplanetaryequationswithj2perturbationparti |
_version_ |
1725583989560836096 |