Does Foucault Have a Published 'Œuvre'?

Despite the veneer of agreement, Foucault scholars disagree deeply about where to demarcate the published from the unpublished texts of Foucault. I differentiate four, often tacit, demarcation criteria commonly used by scholars through a survey of the secondary literature (publication, publication*,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: William A. B. Parkhurst
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Open Library of Humanities 2020-06-01
Series:Le foucaldien
Subjects:
Online Access:https://foucaldien.net/articles/73
id doaj-5ef85161c12a4eb1b11a3b16134c5b64
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5ef85161c12a4eb1b11a3b16134c5b642020-11-25T03:36:59ZdeuOpen Library of HumanitiesLe foucaldien2515-20762020-06-016110.16995/lefou.7357Does Foucault Have a Published 'Œuvre'?William A. B. Parkhurst0University of South FloridaDespite the veneer of agreement, Foucault scholars disagree deeply about where to demarcate the published from the unpublished texts of Foucault. I differentiate four, often tacit, demarcation criteria commonly used by scholars through a survey of the secondary literature (publication, publication*, authorization, and publicness). These demarcation criteria generate different and non-coextensive sets of texts categorized as published. Each of these demarcation criteria are problematized by Foucault's complex publication history. The presupposition that there exists a clear division between published and unpublished texts is a false dichotomy and should be abandoned. Instead, scholars must be explicit about why particular kinds of historical evidence are valuable to their projects and avoid abstractions. This should lead to historically informed methodological discussions with a focus on the material facts of individual texts rather than relying on an abstract and historically falsifiable dichotomy.https://foucaldien.net/articles/73foucaultoeuvremethodologyauthor functionpublication history
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author William A. B. Parkhurst
spellingShingle William A. B. Parkhurst
Does Foucault Have a Published 'Œuvre'?
Le foucaldien
foucault
oeuvre
methodology
author function
publication history
author_facet William A. B. Parkhurst
author_sort William A. B. Parkhurst
title Does Foucault Have a Published 'Œuvre'?
title_short Does Foucault Have a Published 'Œuvre'?
title_full Does Foucault Have a Published 'Œuvre'?
title_fullStr Does Foucault Have a Published 'Œuvre'?
title_full_unstemmed Does Foucault Have a Published 'Œuvre'?
title_sort does foucault have a published 'œuvre'?
publisher Open Library of Humanities
series Le foucaldien
issn 2515-2076
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Despite the veneer of agreement, Foucault scholars disagree deeply about where to demarcate the published from the unpublished texts of Foucault. I differentiate four, often tacit, demarcation criteria commonly used by scholars through a survey of the secondary literature (publication, publication*, authorization, and publicness). These demarcation criteria generate different and non-coextensive sets of texts categorized as published. Each of these demarcation criteria are problematized by Foucault's complex publication history. The presupposition that there exists a clear division between published and unpublished texts is a false dichotomy and should be abandoned. Instead, scholars must be explicit about why particular kinds of historical evidence are valuable to their projects and avoid abstractions. This should lead to historically informed methodological discussions with a focus on the material facts of individual texts rather than relying on an abstract and historically falsifiable dichotomy.
topic foucault
oeuvre
methodology
author function
publication history
url https://foucaldien.net/articles/73
work_keys_str_mv AT williamabparkhurst doesfoucaulthaveapublishedœuvre
_version_ 1724547777088716800