The Role of Economics and Democracy in Institutional Change for Sustainability
Institutional change for sustainable development does not happen by itself. Individuals and organizations function as actors to influence development processes. Reference is made to a “political economic person” (PEP) guided by her/his “ideological orientation” and “political economic organization”...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2014-05-01
|
Series: | Sustainability |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/5/2755 |
id |
doaj-5ee728a844c348b3ad73a054d7e44dc7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5ee728a844c348b3ad73a054d7e44dc72020-11-24T23:08:22ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502014-05-01652755276510.3390/su6052755su6052755The Role of Economics and Democracy in Institutional Change for SustainabilityPeter Söderbaum0School of Business, Society and Engineering, Mälardalen University, 721 23 Västerås, SwedenInstitutional change for sustainable development does not happen by itself. Individuals and organizations function as actors to influence development processes. Reference is made to a “political economic person” (PEP) guided by her/his “ideological orientation” and “political economic organization” (PEO), guided by its “mission”. Leaving present unsustainable trends behind is a matter of politics and ideology and even power positions, where democracy plays a crucial role. The perspectives of influential (and other) actors are essential in facilitating (or hindering) change. I will discuss ideas of the role of science in society, mainstream neoclassical economics in relation to institutional economics in the spirit of K. William Kapp and Gunnar Myrdal as well as neo-liberalism as ideology (where neoclassical economics has contributed to strengthen the legitimacy of neo-liberalism). Various aspects of inertia and flexibility in institutional change processes, such as path dependence, are discussed. Emphasis is on the role of economics and how a strengthened democracy can open the door for a degree of pluralism.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/5/2755political economicsideological orientationpolitical economic personpolitical economic organizationneoclassical economicsinstitutional economicsdemocracy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Peter Söderbaum |
spellingShingle |
Peter Söderbaum The Role of Economics and Democracy in Institutional Change for Sustainability Sustainability political economics ideological orientation political economic person political economic organization neoclassical economics institutional economics democracy |
author_facet |
Peter Söderbaum |
author_sort |
Peter Söderbaum |
title |
The Role of Economics and Democracy in Institutional Change for Sustainability |
title_short |
The Role of Economics and Democracy in Institutional Change for Sustainability |
title_full |
The Role of Economics and Democracy in Institutional Change for Sustainability |
title_fullStr |
The Role of Economics and Democracy in Institutional Change for Sustainability |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Role of Economics and Democracy in Institutional Change for Sustainability |
title_sort |
role of economics and democracy in institutional change for sustainability |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Sustainability |
issn |
2071-1050 |
publishDate |
2014-05-01 |
description |
Institutional change for sustainable development does not happen by itself. Individuals and organizations function as actors to influence development processes. Reference is made to a “political economic person” (PEP) guided by her/his “ideological orientation” and “political economic organization” (PEO), guided by its “mission”. Leaving present unsustainable trends behind is a matter of politics and ideology and even power positions, where democracy plays a crucial role. The perspectives of influential (and other) actors are essential in facilitating (or hindering) change. I will discuss ideas of the role of science in society, mainstream neoclassical economics in relation to institutional economics in the spirit of K. William Kapp and Gunnar Myrdal as well as neo-liberalism as ideology (where neoclassical economics has contributed to strengthen the legitimacy of neo-liberalism). Various aspects of inertia and flexibility in institutional change processes, such as path dependence, are discussed. Emphasis is on the role of economics and how a strengthened democracy can open the door for a degree of pluralism. |
topic |
political economics ideological orientation political economic person political economic organization neoclassical economics institutional economics democracy |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/5/2755 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT petersoderbaum theroleofeconomicsanddemocracyininstitutionalchangeforsustainability AT petersoderbaum roleofeconomicsanddemocracyininstitutionalchangeforsustainability |
_version_ |
1725614652347383808 |