Darwin as a geologist in Africa – dispelling the myths and unravelling a confused knot

Two myths persist concerning the role played by Charles Darwin as a geologist in Africa during his epic voyage around the world (1831–1836). The first myth is that Darwin was a completely self-taught geologist, with no formal training. The second myth is that it was Darwin who finally solved t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sharad Master
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Academy of Science of South Africa 2012-09-01
Series:South African Journal of Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://192.168.0.108/index.php/sajs/article/view/9606
id doaj-5ed8c0bf5dd34e55993f5eab5accd696
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5ed8c0bf5dd34e55993f5eab5accd6962021-02-18T13:40:25ZengAcademy of Science of South AfricaSouth African Journal of Science1996-74892012-09-011089/10Darwin as a geologist in Africa – dispelling the myths and unravelling a confused knotSharad Master0Economic Geology Research Institute, School of Geosciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg Two myths persist concerning the role played by Charles Darwin as a geologist in Africa during his epic voyage around the world (1831–1836). The first myth is that Darwin was a completely self-taught geologist, with no formal training. The second myth is that it was Darwin who finally solved the problem of the granite–schist contact at the famous Sea Point coastal exposures in Cape Town, after deliberately setting out to prove his predecessors wrong. These myths are challenged by the now ample evidence that Darwin had excellent help in his geological education from the likes of Robert Jameson, John Henslow and Adam Sedgwick. The story of Darwin and his predecessors at the Sea Point granite contact has become confused, and even conflated, with previous descriptions by Basil Hall (1813) and Clark Abel (1818). Here, the historical record is unravelled and set straight, and it is shown from the evidence of his notebooks that Darwin was quite unaware of the outcrops in Cape Town. His erudite account of the contact was a result of the 8 years spent in writing and correspondence after his return to England and not because of his brilliant insights on the outcrop, as the myth would have it. While there has been little to indicate Darwin’s landfalls in Africa, a new plaque now explains the geology of the Sea Point Contact, and includes a drawing of Darwin’s ship, the Beagle, and quotes from his work. http://192.168.0.108/index.php/sajs/article/view/9606Charles DarwinCape TownGranite-schist contactBasil HallClarke Abel
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sharad Master
spellingShingle Sharad Master
Darwin as a geologist in Africa – dispelling the myths and unravelling a confused knot
South African Journal of Science
Charles Darwin
Cape Town
Granite-schist contact
Basil Hall
Clarke Abel
author_facet Sharad Master
author_sort Sharad Master
title Darwin as a geologist in Africa – dispelling the myths and unravelling a confused knot
title_short Darwin as a geologist in Africa – dispelling the myths and unravelling a confused knot
title_full Darwin as a geologist in Africa – dispelling the myths and unravelling a confused knot
title_fullStr Darwin as a geologist in Africa – dispelling the myths and unravelling a confused knot
title_full_unstemmed Darwin as a geologist in Africa – dispelling the myths and unravelling a confused knot
title_sort darwin as a geologist in africa – dispelling the myths and unravelling a confused knot
publisher Academy of Science of South Africa
series South African Journal of Science
issn 1996-7489
publishDate 2012-09-01
description Two myths persist concerning the role played by Charles Darwin as a geologist in Africa during his epic voyage around the world (1831–1836). The first myth is that Darwin was a completely self-taught geologist, with no formal training. The second myth is that it was Darwin who finally solved the problem of the granite–schist contact at the famous Sea Point coastal exposures in Cape Town, after deliberately setting out to prove his predecessors wrong. These myths are challenged by the now ample evidence that Darwin had excellent help in his geological education from the likes of Robert Jameson, John Henslow and Adam Sedgwick. The story of Darwin and his predecessors at the Sea Point granite contact has become confused, and even conflated, with previous descriptions by Basil Hall (1813) and Clark Abel (1818). Here, the historical record is unravelled and set straight, and it is shown from the evidence of his notebooks that Darwin was quite unaware of the outcrops in Cape Town. His erudite account of the contact was a result of the 8 years spent in writing and correspondence after his return to England and not because of his brilliant insights on the outcrop, as the myth would have it. While there has been little to indicate Darwin’s landfalls in Africa, a new plaque now explains the geology of the Sea Point Contact, and includes a drawing of Darwin’s ship, the Beagle, and quotes from his work.
topic Charles Darwin
Cape Town
Granite-schist contact
Basil Hall
Clarke Abel
url http://192.168.0.108/index.php/sajs/article/view/9606
work_keys_str_mv AT sharadmaster darwinasageologistinafricaadispellingthemythsandunravellingaconfusedknot
_version_ 1724262862072840192