Dynamic Treatment for Proximal Phalangeal Fracture of the Hand

Purpose. To assess a protected mobilisation programme (dynamic treatment) for proximal phalangeal fracture of the hand, irrespective of the geometry. Methods. Clinical and radiological results of 32 consecutive patients with proximal phalangeal fracture of the hand treated from January 2001 to Febru...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: G Rajesh, WY Ip, SP Chow, BKK Fung
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2007-08-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900701500218
id doaj-5eba9ff85d2546d5b099cbce8db494ee
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5eba9ff85d2546d5b099cbce8db494ee2020-11-25T03:20:53ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902007-08-011510.1177/230949900701500218Dynamic Treatment for Proximal Phalangeal Fracture of the HandG RajeshWY IpSP ChowBKK FungPurpose. To assess a protected mobilisation programme (dynamic treatment) for proximal phalangeal fracture of the hand, irrespective of the geometry. Methods. Clinical and radiological results of 32 consecutive patients with proximal phalangeal fracture of the hand treated from January 2001 to February 2007 were evaluated. Our supervised rehabilitation programme was strictly followed to gain full range of movement of the proximal interphalangeal joint and to prevent the development of an extension lag contracture. Patients were followed up for a mean period of 15 (range, 13–16) months. Results were evaluated using the Belsky classification. Results. The results were excellent in 72% of the patients, good in 22%, and poor in 6%. Some patients defaulted follow-up, which made long-term assessment difficult. The poor results may have been related to patient non-compliance or default from rehabilitation. Many good results upgraded to excellent following further rehabilitation. Conclusion. Skeletal stability, not rigidity, is necessary for functional movements of the hand. Proximal phalangeal fractures can be effectively treated by closed methods, using the stabilising effect of soft tissues (zancolli complex–metacarpophalangeal retention apparatus) and external devices (metacarpophalangeal block splint), thus enabling bone healing and movement recovery at the same time.https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900701500218
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author G Rajesh
WY Ip
SP Chow
BKK Fung
spellingShingle G Rajesh
WY Ip
SP Chow
BKK Fung
Dynamic Treatment for Proximal Phalangeal Fracture of the Hand
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
author_facet G Rajesh
WY Ip
SP Chow
BKK Fung
author_sort G Rajesh
title Dynamic Treatment for Proximal Phalangeal Fracture of the Hand
title_short Dynamic Treatment for Proximal Phalangeal Fracture of the Hand
title_full Dynamic Treatment for Proximal Phalangeal Fracture of the Hand
title_fullStr Dynamic Treatment for Proximal Phalangeal Fracture of the Hand
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic Treatment for Proximal Phalangeal Fracture of the Hand
title_sort dynamic treatment for proximal phalangeal fracture of the hand
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
issn 2309-4990
publishDate 2007-08-01
description Purpose. To assess a protected mobilisation programme (dynamic treatment) for proximal phalangeal fracture of the hand, irrespective of the geometry. Methods. Clinical and radiological results of 32 consecutive patients with proximal phalangeal fracture of the hand treated from January 2001 to February 2007 were evaluated. Our supervised rehabilitation programme was strictly followed to gain full range of movement of the proximal interphalangeal joint and to prevent the development of an extension lag contracture. Patients were followed up for a mean period of 15 (range, 13–16) months. Results were evaluated using the Belsky classification. Results. The results were excellent in 72% of the patients, good in 22%, and poor in 6%. Some patients defaulted follow-up, which made long-term assessment difficult. The poor results may have been related to patient non-compliance or default from rehabilitation. Many good results upgraded to excellent following further rehabilitation. Conclusion. Skeletal stability, not rigidity, is necessary for functional movements of the hand. Proximal phalangeal fractures can be effectively treated by closed methods, using the stabilising effect of soft tissues (zancolli complex–metacarpophalangeal retention apparatus) and external devices (metacarpophalangeal block splint), thus enabling bone healing and movement recovery at the same time.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900701500218
work_keys_str_mv AT grajesh dynamictreatmentforproximalphalangealfractureofthehand
AT wyip dynamictreatmentforproximalphalangealfractureofthehand
AT spchow dynamictreatmentforproximalphalangealfractureofthehand
AT bkkfung dynamictreatmentforproximalphalangealfractureofthehand
_version_ 1724615983009628160