Trinitarianism In Didache, Barnabas, and the Shepherd: Sketchy, Scant, or Scandalous?

A survey of works on the development of nascent trinitarianism, especially in the last several decades, reveals that most treatments cut a wide path around three of the earliest Christian writings: Didache, Barnabas, and Shepherd of Hermas. Because these writings straddle the apostolic/post-apostoli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Svigel Michael J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2019-03-01
Series:Perichoresis: The Theological Journal of Emanuel University
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.2478/perc-2019-0008
id doaj-5eb3dc90a58b4e52baef12f7f4adc375
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5eb3dc90a58b4e52baef12f7f4adc3752021-09-05T14:00:54ZengSciendoPerichoresis: The Theological Journal of Emanuel University2284-73082019-03-01171234010.2478/perc-2019-0008perc-2019-0008Trinitarianism In Didache, Barnabas, and the Shepherd: Sketchy, Scant, or Scandalous?Svigel Michael J.0Dallas Theological SeminaryA survey of works on the development of nascent trinitarianism, especially in the last several decades, reveals that most treatments cut a wide path around three of the earliest Christian writings: Didache, Barnabas, and Shepherd of Hermas. Because these writings straddle the apostolic/post-apostolic eras (c. AD 50-150), they should be regarded as essential links in any historical account of the development of trinitarian theology. Nevertheless, these writings have sometimes been regarded as having sketchy, scant, or scandalous christologies and pneumatologies. This article argues that the typical critical estimations of these writings as nontrinitarian are under-supported by the textual evidence. Rather, Didache, Barnabas, and the Shepherd of Hermas may very well presuppose a basic christocentric and trinitarian creation-redemption narrative. Far from scandalous, these texts provide a positive link in the continuity from seminal apostolic trinitarian thought to the later trinitarian growth of the second century.https://doi.org/10.2478/perc-2019-0008trinitarianismchristologydidachebarnabasshepherd of hermas
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Svigel Michael J.
spellingShingle Svigel Michael J.
Trinitarianism In Didache, Barnabas, and the Shepherd: Sketchy, Scant, or Scandalous?
Perichoresis: The Theological Journal of Emanuel University
trinitarianism
christology
didache
barnabas
shepherd of hermas
author_facet Svigel Michael J.
author_sort Svigel Michael J.
title Trinitarianism In Didache, Barnabas, and the Shepherd: Sketchy, Scant, or Scandalous?
title_short Trinitarianism In Didache, Barnabas, and the Shepherd: Sketchy, Scant, or Scandalous?
title_full Trinitarianism In Didache, Barnabas, and the Shepherd: Sketchy, Scant, or Scandalous?
title_fullStr Trinitarianism In Didache, Barnabas, and the Shepherd: Sketchy, Scant, or Scandalous?
title_full_unstemmed Trinitarianism In Didache, Barnabas, and the Shepherd: Sketchy, Scant, or Scandalous?
title_sort trinitarianism in didache, barnabas, and the shepherd: sketchy, scant, or scandalous?
publisher Sciendo
series Perichoresis: The Theological Journal of Emanuel University
issn 2284-7308
publishDate 2019-03-01
description A survey of works on the development of nascent trinitarianism, especially in the last several decades, reveals that most treatments cut a wide path around three of the earliest Christian writings: Didache, Barnabas, and Shepherd of Hermas. Because these writings straddle the apostolic/post-apostolic eras (c. AD 50-150), they should be regarded as essential links in any historical account of the development of trinitarian theology. Nevertheless, these writings have sometimes been regarded as having sketchy, scant, or scandalous christologies and pneumatologies. This article argues that the typical critical estimations of these writings as nontrinitarian are under-supported by the textual evidence. Rather, Didache, Barnabas, and the Shepherd of Hermas may very well presuppose a basic christocentric and trinitarian creation-redemption narrative. Far from scandalous, these texts provide a positive link in the continuity from seminal apostolic trinitarian thought to the later trinitarian growth of the second century.
topic trinitarianism
christology
didache
barnabas
shepherd of hermas
url https://doi.org/10.2478/perc-2019-0008
work_keys_str_mv AT svigelmichaelj trinitarianismindidachebarnabasandtheshepherdsketchyscantorscandalous
_version_ 1717811149231095808