Assessment of medical professionalism using the Professionalism Mini Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) in a multi-ethnic society: a Delphi study
Abstract Background The importance of medical professionalism and its assessment has been well documented in the literature. However, there is currently no culturally-adapted tool to assess medical professionalism in Singapore. This study sets out to find consensus on relevance of the items from the...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-07-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Education |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-020-02147-9 |
id |
doaj-5eb39c915732428eb81e191a2285b991 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5eb39c915732428eb81e191a2285b9912020-11-25T03:37:06ZengBMCBMC Medical Education1472-69202020-07-012011910.1186/s12909-020-02147-9Assessment of medical professionalism using the Professionalism Mini Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) in a multi-ethnic society: a Delphi studyWarren Fong0Yu Heng Kwan1Sungwon Yoon2Jie Kie Phang3Julian Thumboo4Ying Ying Leung5Swee Cheng Ng6Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General HospitalProgram in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical SchoolProgram in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical SchoolDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General HospitalDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General HospitalDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General HospitalDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General HospitalAbstract Background The importance of medical professionalism and its assessment has been well documented in the literature. However, there is currently no culturally-adapted tool to assess medical professionalism in Singapore. This study sets out to find consensus on relevance of the items from the Professionalism Mini Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) for assessing medical professionalism in Singapore. Methods A two-round Delphi survey was completed by an expert panel consisting of program directors, associate designated institutional officials, and designated institutional official (n = 15) from residency programs in Singapore. Round 1 comprised of 23 items from the P-MEX rated on a 5-point scale (1 = Definitely include, 2 = Possibly include, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Possibly exclude, 5 = Definitely exclude). In round 2, the experts received feedback from the previous round, and were asked to re-rate the items which did not achieve consensus in the previous round. The threshold for consensus in the study was defined as 70% or greater agreement among experts. Results Completed questionnaires for both rounds were received from all 15 experts. In round 1, 18 items (78%) achieved consensus to be included. In round 2, 1 (4%) item achieved consensus to be included. However, none of the remaining items achieved consensus to be removed, and they exhibited stability in responses. A list of 19 items covering four domains of medical professionalism (Doctor-patient relationship skills, Reflective skills, Time management and Inter-professional relationship skills) was obtained during the two-rounds of Delphi survey. Conclusions Nineteen items in the P-MEX had garnered consensus and is suitable for assessing medical professionalism in Singapore. The findings of this study can provide guidance for faculty and institutions who want to assess medical professionalism of their medical trainees.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-020-02147-9ProfessionalismSingaporeDelphiAssessment |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Warren Fong Yu Heng Kwan Sungwon Yoon Jie Kie Phang Julian Thumboo Ying Ying Leung Swee Cheng Ng |
spellingShingle |
Warren Fong Yu Heng Kwan Sungwon Yoon Jie Kie Phang Julian Thumboo Ying Ying Leung Swee Cheng Ng Assessment of medical professionalism using the Professionalism Mini Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) in a multi-ethnic society: a Delphi study BMC Medical Education Professionalism Singapore Delphi Assessment |
author_facet |
Warren Fong Yu Heng Kwan Sungwon Yoon Jie Kie Phang Julian Thumboo Ying Ying Leung Swee Cheng Ng |
author_sort |
Warren Fong |
title |
Assessment of medical professionalism using the Professionalism Mini Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) in a multi-ethnic society: a Delphi study |
title_short |
Assessment of medical professionalism using the Professionalism Mini Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) in a multi-ethnic society: a Delphi study |
title_full |
Assessment of medical professionalism using the Professionalism Mini Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) in a multi-ethnic society: a Delphi study |
title_fullStr |
Assessment of medical professionalism using the Professionalism Mini Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) in a multi-ethnic society: a Delphi study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Assessment of medical professionalism using the Professionalism Mini Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) in a multi-ethnic society: a Delphi study |
title_sort |
assessment of medical professionalism using the professionalism mini evaluation exercise (p-mex) in a multi-ethnic society: a delphi study |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Medical Education |
issn |
1472-6920 |
publishDate |
2020-07-01 |
description |
Abstract Background The importance of medical professionalism and its assessment has been well documented in the literature. However, there is currently no culturally-adapted tool to assess medical professionalism in Singapore. This study sets out to find consensus on relevance of the items from the Professionalism Mini Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) for assessing medical professionalism in Singapore. Methods A two-round Delphi survey was completed by an expert panel consisting of program directors, associate designated institutional officials, and designated institutional official (n = 15) from residency programs in Singapore. Round 1 comprised of 23 items from the P-MEX rated on a 5-point scale (1 = Definitely include, 2 = Possibly include, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Possibly exclude, 5 = Definitely exclude). In round 2, the experts received feedback from the previous round, and were asked to re-rate the items which did not achieve consensus in the previous round. The threshold for consensus in the study was defined as 70% or greater agreement among experts. Results Completed questionnaires for both rounds were received from all 15 experts. In round 1, 18 items (78%) achieved consensus to be included. In round 2, 1 (4%) item achieved consensus to be included. However, none of the remaining items achieved consensus to be removed, and they exhibited stability in responses. A list of 19 items covering four domains of medical professionalism (Doctor-patient relationship skills, Reflective skills, Time management and Inter-professional relationship skills) was obtained during the two-rounds of Delphi survey. Conclusions Nineteen items in the P-MEX had garnered consensus and is suitable for assessing medical professionalism in Singapore. The findings of this study can provide guidance for faculty and institutions who want to assess medical professionalism of their medical trainees. |
topic |
Professionalism Singapore Delphi Assessment |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-020-02147-9 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT warrenfong assessmentofmedicalprofessionalismusingtheprofessionalismminievaluationexercisepmexinamultiethnicsocietyadelphistudy AT yuhengkwan assessmentofmedicalprofessionalismusingtheprofessionalismminievaluationexercisepmexinamultiethnicsocietyadelphistudy AT sungwonyoon assessmentofmedicalprofessionalismusingtheprofessionalismminievaluationexercisepmexinamultiethnicsocietyadelphistudy AT jiekiephang assessmentofmedicalprofessionalismusingtheprofessionalismminievaluationexercisepmexinamultiethnicsocietyadelphistudy AT julianthumboo assessmentofmedicalprofessionalismusingtheprofessionalismminievaluationexercisepmexinamultiethnicsocietyadelphistudy AT yingyingleung assessmentofmedicalprofessionalismusingtheprofessionalismminievaluationexercisepmexinamultiethnicsocietyadelphistudy AT sweechengng assessmentofmedicalprofessionalismusingtheprofessionalismminievaluationexercisepmexinamultiethnicsocietyadelphistudy |
_version_ |
1724547188057440256 |