Assessment of medical professionalism using the Professionalism Mini Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) in a multi-ethnic society: a Delphi study

Abstract Background The importance of medical professionalism and its assessment has been well documented in the literature. However, there is currently no culturally-adapted tool to assess medical professionalism in Singapore. This study sets out to find consensus on relevance of the items from the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Warren Fong, Yu Heng Kwan, Sungwon Yoon, Jie Kie Phang, Julian Thumboo, Ying Ying Leung, Swee Cheng Ng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-07-01
Series:BMC Medical Education
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-020-02147-9
id doaj-5eb39c915732428eb81e191a2285b991
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5eb39c915732428eb81e191a2285b9912020-11-25T03:37:06ZengBMCBMC Medical Education1472-69202020-07-012011910.1186/s12909-020-02147-9Assessment of medical professionalism using the Professionalism Mini Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) in a multi-ethnic society: a Delphi studyWarren Fong0Yu Heng Kwan1Sungwon Yoon2Jie Kie Phang3Julian Thumboo4Ying Ying Leung5Swee Cheng Ng6Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General HospitalProgram in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical SchoolProgram in Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical SchoolDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General HospitalDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General HospitalDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General HospitalDepartment of Rheumatology and Immunology, Singapore General HospitalAbstract Background The importance of medical professionalism and its assessment has been well documented in the literature. However, there is currently no culturally-adapted tool to assess medical professionalism in Singapore. This study sets out to find consensus on relevance of the items from the Professionalism Mini Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) for assessing medical professionalism in Singapore. Methods A two-round Delphi survey was completed by an expert panel consisting of program directors, associate designated institutional officials, and designated institutional official (n = 15) from residency programs in Singapore. Round 1 comprised of 23 items from the P-MEX rated on a 5-point scale (1 = Definitely include, 2 = Possibly include, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Possibly exclude, 5 = Definitely exclude). In round 2, the experts received feedback from the previous round, and were asked to re-rate the items which did not achieve consensus in the previous round. The threshold for consensus in the study was defined as 70% or greater agreement among experts. Results Completed questionnaires for both rounds were received from all 15 experts. In round 1, 18 items (78%) achieved consensus to be included. In round 2, 1 (4%) item achieved consensus to be included. However, none of the remaining items achieved consensus to be removed, and they exhibited stability in responses. A list of 19 items covering four domains of medical professionalism (Doctor-patient relationship skills, Reflective skills, Time management and Inter-professional relationship skills) was obtained during the two-rounds of Delphi survey. Conclusions Nineteen items in the P-MEX had garnered consensus and is suitable for assessing medical professionalism in Singapore. The findings of this study can provide guidance for faculty and institutions who want to assess medical professionalism of their medical trainees.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-020-02147-9ProfessionalismSingaporeDelphiAssessment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Warren Fong
Yu Heng Kwan
Sungwon Yoon
Jie Kie Phang
Julian Thumboo
Ying Ying Leung
Swee Cheng Ng
spellingShingle Warren Fong
Yu Heng Kwan
Sungwon Yoon
Jie Kie Phang
Julian Thumboo
Ying Ying Leung
Swee Cheng Ng
Assessment of medical professionalism using the Professionalism Mini Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) in a multi-ethnic society: a Delphi study
BMC Medical Education
Professionalism
Singapore
Delphi
Assessment
author_facet Warren Fong
Yu Heng Kwan
Sungwon Yoon
Jie Kie Phang
Julian Thumboo
Ying Ying Leung
Swee Cheng Ng
author_sort Warren Fong
title Assessment of medical professionalism using the Professionalism Mini Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) in a multi-ethnic society: a Delphi study
title_short Assessment of medical professionalism using the Professionalism Mini Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) in a multi-ethnic society: a Delphi study
title_full Assessment of medical professionalism using the Professionalism Mini Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) in a multi-ethnic society: a Delphi study
title_fullStr Assessment of medical professionalism using the Professionalism Mini Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) in a multi-ethnic society: a Delphi study
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of medical professionalism using the Professionalism Mini Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) in a multi-ethnic society: a Delphi study
title_sort assessment of medical professionalism using the professionalism mini evaluation exercise (p-mex) in a multi-ethnic society: a delphi study
publisher BMC
series BMC Medical Education
issn 1472-6920
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Abstract Background The importance of medical professionalism and its assessment has been well documented in the literature. However, there is currently no culturally-adapted tool to assess medical professionalism in Singapore. This study sets out to find consensus on relevance of the items from the Professionalism Mini Evaluation Exercise (P-MEX) for assessing medical professionalism in Singapore. Methods A two-round Delphi survey was completed by an expert panel consisting of program directors, associate designated institutional officials, and designated institutional official (n = 15) from residency programs in Singapore. Round 1 comprised of 23 items from the P-MEX rated on a 5-point scale (1 = Definitely include, 2 = Possibly include, 3 = Neutral, 4 = Possibly exclude, 5 = Definitely exclude). In round 2, the experts received feedback from the previous round, and were asked to re-rate the items which did not achieve consensus in the previous round. The threshold for consensus in the study was defined as 70% or greater agreement among experts. Results Completed questionnaires for both rounds were received from all 15 experts. In round 1, 18 items (78%) achieved consensus to be included. In round 2, 1 (4%) item achieved consensus to be included. However, none of the remaining items achieved consensus to be removed, and they exhibited stability in responses. A list of 19 items covering four domains of medical professionalism (Doctor-patient relationship skills, Reflective skills, Time management and Inter-professional relationship skills) was obtained during the two-rounds of Delphi survey. Conclusions Nineteen items in the P-MEX had garnered consensus and is suitable for assessing medical professionalism in Singapore. The findings of this study can provide guidance for faculty and institutions who want to assess medical professionalism of their medical trainees.
topic Professionalism
Singapore
Delphi
Assessment
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-020-02147-9
work_keys_str_mv AT warrenfong assessmentofmedicalprofessionalismusingtheprofessionalismminievaluationexercisepmexinamultiethnicsocietyadelphistudy
AT yuhengkwan assessmentofmedicalprofessionalismusingtheprofessionalismminievaluationexercisepmexinamultiethnicsocietyadelphistudy
AT sungwonyoon assessmentofmedicalprofessionalismusingtheprofessionalismminievaluationexercisepmexinamultiethnicsocietyadelphistudy
AT jiekiephang assessmentofmedicalprofessionalismusingtheprofessionalismminievaluationexercisepmexinamultiethnicsocietyadelphistudy
AT julianthumboo assessmentofmedicalprofessionalismusingtheprofessionalismminievaluationexercisepmexinamultiethnicsocietyadelphistudy
AT yingyingleung assessmentofmedicalprofessionalismusingtheprofessionalismminievaluationexercisepmexinamultiethnicsocietyadelphistudy
AT sweechengng assessmentofmedicalprofessionalismusingtheprofessionalismminievaluationexercisepmexinamultiethnicsocietyadelphistudy
_version_ 1724547188057440256