Active Mobilisation after Flexor Tendon Repair: Comparison of Results following Injuries in Zone 2 and other Zones
Purpose. To prospectively study the role of active mobilisation after flexor tendon repair. Methods. The standard modified Kessler's technique was used to repair 46 digits in 32 patients with flexor tendon injuries. Early active mobilisation of the repaired digit was commenced on the third post...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2005-08-01
|
Series: | Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900501300209 |
id |
doaj-5ea51044b0f141ed870ca45cf71242d1 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5ea51044b0f141ed870ca45cf71242d12020-11-25T04:00:21ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902005-08-011310.1177/230949900501300209Active Mobilisation after Flexor Tendon Repair: Comparison of Results following Injuries in Zone 2 and other ZonesLK HungKW PangPLC YeungL CheungJMW WongP ChanPurpose. To prospectively study the role of active mobilisation after flexor tendon repair. Methods. The standard modified Kessler's technique was used to repair 46 digits in 32 patients with flexor tendon injuries. Early active mobilisation of the repaired digit was commenced on the third postoperative day. Range of movement was monitored and recovery from injury in zone 2 was compared with injury in other zones. Results. There were 24 and 22 injuries in zone 2 and other zones respectively. The total active motion score of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand was measured. Patients with zone-2 injuries achieved similar results to those with other-zone injuries apart from a 3-week delay in recovery. The final results were good to excellent in 71% and 77% of zone-2 and other-zone cases respectively (p<0.05). There were 2 ruptures in zone-2 and one rupture in zone-3 repairs (6.5%). Conclusion. Preliminary results of this study showed that active mobilisation following flexor tendon repair provides comparable clinical results and is as safe as conventional mobilisation programmes although recovery in patients with zone-2 injury was delayed.https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900501300209 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
LK Hung KW Pang PLC Yeung L Cheung JMW Wong P Chan |
spellingShingle |
LK Hung KW Pang PLC Yeung L Cheung JMW Wong P Chan Active Mobilisation after Flexor Tendon Repair: Comparison of Results following Injuries in Zone 2 and other Zones Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery |
author_facet |
LK Hung KW Pang PLC Yeung L Cheung JMW Wong P Chan |
author_sort |
LK Hung |
title |
Active Mobilisation after Flexor Tendon Repair: Comparison of Results following Injuries in Zone 2 and other Zones |
title_short |
Active Mobilisation after Flexor Tendon Repair: Comparison of Results following Injuries in Zone 2 and other Zones |
title_full |
Active Mobilisation after Flexor Tendon Repair: Comparison of Results following Injuries in Zone 2 and other Zones |
title_fullStr |
Active Mobilisation after Flexor Tendon Repair: Comparison of Results following Injuries in Zone 2 and other Zones |
title_full_unstemmed |
Active Mobilisation after Flexor Tendon Repair: Comparison of Results following Injuries in Zone 2 and other Zones |
title_sort |
active mobilisation after flexor tendon repair: comparison of results following injuries in zone 2 and other zones |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery |
issn |
2309-4990 |
publishDate |
2005-08-01 |
description |
Purpose. To prospectively study the role of active mobilisation after flexor tendon repair. Methods. The standard modified Kessler's technique was used to repair 46 digits in 32 patients with flexor tendon injuries. Early active mobilisation of the repaired digit was commenced on the third postoperative day. Range of movement was monitored and recovery from injury in zone 2 was compared with injury in other zones. Results. There were 24 and 22 injuries in zone 2 and other zones respectively. The total active motion score of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand was measured. Patients with zone-2 injuries achieved similar results to those with other-zone injuries apart from a 3-week delay in recovery. The final results were good to excellent in 71% and 77% of zone-2 and other-zone cases respectively (p<0.05). There were 2 ruptures in zone-2 and one rupture in zone-3 repairs (6.5%). Conclusion. Preliminary results of this study showed that active mobilisation following flexor tendon repair provides comparable clinical results and is as safe as conventional mobilisation programmes although recovery in patients with zone-2 injury was delayed. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900501300209 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lkhung activemobilisationafterflexortendonrepaircomparisonofresultsfollowinginjuriesinzone2andotherzones AT kwpang activemobilisationafterflexortendonrepaircomparisonofresultsfollowinginjuriesinzone2andotherzones AT plcyeung activemobilisationafterflexortendonrepaircomparisonofresultsfollowinginjuriesinzone2andotherzones AT lcheung activemobilisationafterflexortendonrepaircomparisonofresultsfollowinginjuriesinzone2andotherzones AT jmwwong activemobilisationafterflexortendonrepaircomparisonofresultsfollowinginjuriesinzone2andotherzones AT pchan activemobilisationafterflexortendonrepaircomparisonofresultsfollowinginjuriesinzone2andotherzones |
_version_ |
1724451167116722176 |