Active Mobilisation after Flexor Tendon Repair: Comparison of Results following Injuries in Zone 2 and other Zones

Purpose. To prospectively study the role of active mobilisation after flexor tendon repair. Methods. The standard modified Kessler's technique was used to repair 46 digits in 32 patients with flexor tendon injuries. Early active mobilisation of the repaired digit was commenced on the third post...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: LK Hung, KW Pang, PLC Yeung, L Cheung, JMW Wong, P Chan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2005-08-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900501300209
id doaj-5ea51044b0f141ed870ca45cf71242d1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5ea51044b0f141ed870ca45cf71242d12020-11-25T04:00:21ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902005-08-011310.1177/230949900501300209Active Mobilisation after Flexor Tendon Repair: Comparison of Results following Injuries in Zone 2 and other ZonesLK HungKW PangPLC YeungL CheungJMW WongP ChanPurpose. To prospectively study the role of active mobilisation after flexor tendon repair. Methods. The standard modified Kessler's technique was used to repair 46 digits in 32 patients with flexor tendon injuries. Early active mobilisation of the repaired digit was commenced on the third postoperative day. Range of movement was monitored and recovery from injury in zone 2 was compared with injury in other zones. Results. There were 24 and 22 injuries in zone 2 and other zones respectively. The total active motion score of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand was measured. Patients with zone-2 injuries achieved similar results to those with other-zone injuries apart from a 3-week delay in recovery. The final results were good to excellent in 71% and 77% of zone-2 and other-zone cases respectively (p<0.05). There were 2 ruptures in zone-2 and one rupture in zone-3 repairs (6.5%). Conclusion. Preliminary results of this study showed that active mobilisation following flexor tendon repair provides comparable clinical results and is as safe as conventional mobilisation programmes although recovery in patients with zone-2 injury was delayed.https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900501300209
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author LK Hung
KW Pang
PLC Yeung
L Cheung
JMW Wong
P Chan
spellingShingle LK Hung
KW Pang
PLC Yeung
L Cheung
JMW Wong
P Chan
Active Mobilisation after Flexor Tendon Repair: Comparison of Results following Injuries in Zone 2 and other Zones
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
author_facet LK Hung
KW Pang
PLC Yeung
L Cheung
JMW Wong
P Chan
author_sort LK Hung
title Active Mobilisation after Flexor Tendon Repair: Comparison of Results following Injuries in Zone 2 and other Zones
title_short Active Mobilisation after Flexor Tendon Repair: Comparison of Results following Injuries in Zone 2 and other Zones
title_full Active Mobilisation after Flexor Tendon Repair: Comparison of Results following Injuries in Zone 2 and other Zones
title_fullStr Active Mobilisation after Flexor Tendon Repair: Comparison of Results following Injuries in Zone 2 and other Zones
title_full_unstemmed Active Mobilisation after Flexor Tendon Repair: Comparison of Results following Injuries in Zone 2 and other Zones
title_sort active mobilisation after flexor tendon repair: comparison of results following injuries in zone 2 and other zones
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
issn 2309-4990
publishDate 2005-08-01
description Purpose. To prospectively study the role of active mobilisation after flexor tendon repair. Methods. The standard modified Kessler's technique was used to repair 46 digits in 32 patients with flexor tendon injuries. Early active mobilisation of the repaired digit was commenced on the third postoperative day. Range of movement was monitored and recovery from injury in zone 2 was compared with injury in other zones. Results. There were 24 and 22 injuries in zone 2 and other zones respectively. The total active motion score of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand was measured. Patients with zone-2 injuries achieved similar results to those with other-zone injuries apart from a 3-week delay in recovery. The final results were good to excellent in 71% and 77% of zone-2 and other-zone cases respectively (p<0.05). There were 2 ruptures in zone-2 and one rupture in zone-3 repairs (6.5%). Conclusion. Preliminary results of this study showed that active mobilisation following flexor tendon repair provides comparable clinical results and is as safe as conventional mobilisation programmes although recovery in patients with zone-2 injury was delayed.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/230949900501300209
work_keys_str_mv AT lkhung activemobilisationafterflexortendonrepaircomparisonofresultsfollowinginjuriesinzone2andotherzones
AT kwpang activemobilisationafterflexortendonrepaircomparisonofresultsfollowinginjuriesinzone2andotherzones
AT plcyeung activemobilisationafterflexortendonrepaircomparisonofresultsfollowinginjuriesinzone2andotherzones
AT lcheung activemobilisationafterflexortendonrepaircomparisonofresultsfollowinginjuriesinzone2andotherzones
AT jmwwong activemobilisationafterflexortendonrepaircomparisonofresultsfollowinginjuriesinzone2andotherzones
AT pchan activemobilisationafterflexortendonrepaircomparisonofresultsfollowinginjuriesinzone2andotherzones
_version_ 1724451167116722176