The influence of the 'good' patient ideal on engagement in HIV care.

Research on patient engagement in health care shows that better health outcomes and lower healthcare costs are observed among highly engaged patients. Similar to other illnesses, high levels of patient engagement in HIV care are considered essential to maintaining optimal health, and patients who ar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kimberly A Koester, Mallory O Johnson, Troy Wood, Rob Fredericksen, Torsten B Neilands, John Sauceda, Heidi M Crane, Michael J Mugavero, Katerina A Christopoulos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214636
id doaj-5e97474eb6bd4f4f9ea87078e18782b3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5e97474eb6bd4f4f9ea87078e18782b32021-07-09T04:30:55ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01143e021463610.1371/journal.pone.0214636The influence of the 'good' patient ideal on engagement in HIV care.Kimberly A KoesterMallory O JohnsonTroy WoodRob FredericksenTorsten B NeilandsJohn SaucedaHeidi M CraneMichael J MugaveroKaterina A ChristopoulosResearch on patient engagement in health care shows that better health outcomes and lower healthcare costs are observed among highly engaged patients. Similar to other illnesses, high levels of patient engagement in HIV care are considered essential to maintaining optimal health, and patients who are on treatment and retained in HIV care are known to have better health outcomes. In this article, we draw on focus group discussion data with patients living with HIV in order to explain tacit expectations associated with engagement in care. The main objective of our research was to elicit an explanatory model of engagement in HIV care from the patients' perspective. We conducted focus group discussions with a sample of two distinct types of patients: those who regularly attended medical appointments and those who did not. In total, we conducted six focus group discussions (n = 43) across in three cities in the US; these included two focus group discussions with a well-engaged and less-well-engaged group in each location. Both types of patients assigned a moral dimension to engagement in care, in that well-engaged patients were considered to be 'good' patients. Aspiring to become a 'good' patient provided a meaningful goal for some and deepened vulnerabilities among patients that struggled to achieve this status. More vulnerable patients may feel less secure in health care interactions and these feelings may be amplified if patients have an unreasonable impression of what constitutes a 'good' patient; thereby leading to disengagement in care. Our findings can inform the development of patient-centered, tailored messages to better serve patients struggling to stay engaged in HIV care.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214636
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kimberly A Koester
Mallory O Johnson
Troy Wood
Rob Fredericksen
Torsten B Neilands
John Sauceda
Heidi M Crane
Michael J Mugavero
Katerina A Christopoulos
spellingShingle Kimberly A Koester
Mallory O Johnson
Troy Wood
Rob Fredericksen
Torsten B Neilands
John Sauceda
Heidi M Crane
Michael J Mugavero
Katerina A Christopoulos
The influence of the 'good' patient ideal on engagement in HIV care.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Kimberly A Koester
Mallory O Johnson
Troy Wood
Rob Fredericksen
Torsten B Neilands
John Sauceda
Heidi M Crane
Michael J Mugavero
Katerina A Christopoulos
author_sort Kimberly A Koester
title The influence of the 'good' patient ideal on engagement in HIV care.
title_short The influence of the 'good' patient ideal on engagement in HIV care.
title_full The influence of the 'good' patient ideal on engagement in HIV care.
title_fullStr The influence of the 'good' patient ideal on engagement in HIV care.
title_full_unstemmed The influence of the 'good' patient ideal on engagement in HIV care.
title_sort influence of the 'good' patient ideal on engagement in hiv care.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Research on patient engagement in health care shows that better health outcomes and lower healthcare costs are observed among highly engaged patients. Similar to other illnesses, high levels of patient engagement in HIV care are considered essential to maintaining optimal health, and patients who are on treatment and retained in HIV care are known to have better health outcomes. In this article, we draw on focus group discussion data with patients living with HIV in order to explain tacit expectations associated with engagement in care. The main objective of our research was to elicit an explanatory model of engagement in HIV care from the patients' perspective. We conducted focus group discussions with a sample of two distinct types of patients: those who regularly attended medical appointments and those who did not. In total, we conducted six focus group discussions (n = 43) across in three cities in the US; these included two focus group discussions with a well-engaged and less-well-engaged group in each location. Both types of patients assigned a moral dimension to engagement in care, in that well-engaged patients were considered to be 'good' patients. Aspiring to become a 'good' patient provided a meaningful goal for some and deepened vulnerabilities among patients that struggled to achieve this status. More vulnerable patients may feel less secure in health care interactions and these feelings may be amplified if patients have an unreasonable impression of what constitutes a 'good' patient; thereby leading to disengagement in care. Our findings can inform the development of patient-centered, tailored messages to better serve patients struggling to stay engaged in HIV care.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214636
work_keys_str_mv AT kimberlyakoester theinfluenceofthegoodpatientidealonengagementinhivcare
AT malloryojohnson theinfluenceofthegoodpatientidealonengagementinhivcare
AT troywood theinfluenceofthegoodpatientidealonengagementinhivcare
AT robfredericksen theinfluenceofthegoodpatientidealonengagementinhivcare
AT torstenbneilands theinfluenceofthegoodpatientidealonengagementinhivcare
AT johnsauceda theinfluenceofthegoodpatientidealonengagementinhivcare
AT heidimcrane theinfluenceofthegoodpatientidealonengagementinhivcare
AT michaeljmugavero theinfluenceofthegoodpatientidealonengagementinhivcare
AT katerinaachristopoulos theinfluenceofthegoodpatientidealonengagementinhivcare
AT kimberlyakoester influenceofthegoodpatientidealonengagementinhivcare
AT malloryojohnson influenceofthegoodpatientidealonengagementinhivcare
AT troywood influenceofthegoodpatientidealonengagementinhivcare
AT robfredericksen influenceofthegoodpatientidealonengagementinhivcare
AT torstenbneilands influenceofthegoodpatientidealonengagementinhivcare
AT johnsauceda influenceofthegoodpatientidealonengagementinhivcare
AT heidimcrane influenceofthegoodpatientidealonengagementinhivcare
AT michaeljmugavero influenceofthegoodpatientidealonengagementinhivcare
AT katerinaachristopoulos influenceofthegoodpatientidealonengagementinhivcare
_version_ 1721312273407934464