Editorial: Quantifying Higher Education: Governing Universities and Academics by Numbers

Over the past decades, ‘governing by numbers’ has taken a flight in the higher education sector. Performance-based budgeting and quality assurance schemes orient universities to new objectives, while rankings have globalised the metrified observation of higher education at large. Where previously no...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maarten Hillebrandt, Michael Huber
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2020-04-01
Series:Politics and Governance
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2585
id doaj-5e8ec7e22bb94129b5b6a0a3fb8e8426
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5e8ec7e22bb94129b5b6a0a3fb8e84262020-11-25T02:53:44ZengCogitatioPolitics and Governance2183-24632020-04-01821510.17645/pag.v8i2.25851387Editorial: Quantifying Higher Education: Governing Universities and Academics by NumbersMaarten Hillebrandt0Michael Huber1Faculty of Law, University of Helsinki, FinlandFaculty of Sociology, Bielefeld University, GermanyOver the past decades, ‘governing by numbers’ has taken a flight in the higher education sector. Performance-based budgeting and quality assurance schemes orient universities to new objectives, while rankings have globalised the metrified observation of higher education at large. Where previously no indicators existed, they are being introduced; where indicators already existed, they are being standardised for purposes of comparison. This thematic issue aims to work towards a more comprehensive understanding of the growing diversity of quantification-based instruments in higher education sectors in three European countries. The effects of quantification are noticed at all levels of the higher education system, from policy makers at the top of the regulatory pyramid down to students and academic staff. Yet even quantifiers outside of the regulatory system, such as ranking and metrics organisations, may have an important bearing on the operation of the university organisation and the sector at large. Thus, an entire governance landscape emerges in which actors at various levels turn to numbers for guidance. The articles in this thematic issue analyse the life cycle of such numbers, from their origins, through to their production and finally, their consequences. This editorial outlines the central questions and overarching issues addressed by the thematic issue and introduces its various contributions.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2585comparative policy studieshigher education governancemanagerialismperformance indicatorsquantificationregulation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maarten Hillebrandt
Michael Huber
spellingShingle Maarten Hillebrandt
Michael Huber
Editorial: Quantifying Higher Education: Governing Universities and Academics by Numbers
Politics and Governance
comparative policy studies
higher education governance
managerialism
performance indicators
quantification
regulation
author_facet Maarten Hillebrandt
Michael Huber
author_sort Maarten Hillebrandt
title Editorial: Quantifying Higher Education: Governing Universities and Academics by Numbers
title_short Editorial: Quantifying Higher Education: Governing Universities and Academics by Numbers
title_full Editorial: Quantifying Higher Education: Governing Universities and Academics by Numbers
title_fullStr Editorial: Quantifying Higher Education: Governing Universities and Academics by Numbers
title_full_unstemmed Editorial: Quantifying Higher Education: Governing Universities and Academics by Numbers
title_sort editorial: quantifying higher education: governing universities and academics by numbers
publisher Cogitatio
series Politics and Governance
issn 2183-2463
publishDate 2020-04-01
description Over the past decades, ‘governing by numbers’ has taken a flight in the higher education sector. Performance-based budgeting and quality assurance schemes orient universities to new objectives, while rankings have globalised the metrified observation of higher education at large. Where previously no indicators existed, they are being introduced; where indicators already existed, they are being standardised for purposes of comparison. This thematic issue aims to work towards a more comprehensive understanding of the growing diversity of quantification-based instruments in higher education sectors in three European countries. The effects of quantification are noticed at all levels of the higher education system, from policy makers at the top of the regulatory pyramid down to students and academic staff. Yet even quantifiers outside of the regulatory system, such as ranking and metrics organisations, may have an important bearing on the operation of the university organisation and the sector at large. Thus, an entire governance landscape emerges in which actors at various levels turn to numbers for guidance. The articles in this thematic issue analyse the life cycle of such numbers, from their origins, through to their production and finally, their consequences. This editorial outlines the central questions and overarching issues addressed by the thematic issue and introduces its various contributions.
topic comparative policy studies
higher education governance
managerialism
performance indicators
quantification
regulation
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/2585
work_keys_str_mv AT maartenhillebrandt editorialquantifyinghighereducationgoverninguniversitiesandacademicsbynumbers
AT michaelhuber editorialquantifyinghighereducationgoverninguniversitiesandacademicsbynumbers
_version_ 1724724711166836736