A QuantCrit Analysis of Context, Discipline, Special Education, and Disproportionality

Using a dis/ability critical race theory (DisCrit) and critical quantitative (QuantCrit) lens, we examine disproportionate application of exclusionary discipline on multiply marginalized youth, foregrounding systemic injustice and institutionalized racism. In doing so, we examined temporal-, student...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rebecca A. Cruz, Saili S. Kulkarni, Allison R. Firestone
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2021-08-01
Series:AERA Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211041354
id doaj-5e88ec981c7046b98da6b137a8907e89
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5e88ec981c7046b98da6b137a8907e892021-08-26T02:04:15ZengSAGE PublishingAERA Open2332-85842021-08-01710.1177/23328584211041354A QuantCrit Analysis of Context, Discipline, Special Education, and DisproportionalityRebecca A. CruzSaili S. KulkarniAllison R. FirestoneUsing a dis/ability critical race theory (DisCrit) and critical quantitative (QuantCrit) lens, we examine disproportionate application of exclusionary discipline on multiply marginalized youth, foregrounding systemic injustice and institutionalized racism. In doing so, we examined temporal-, student-, and school-level factors that may result in exclusion and othering (i.e., placing into special education and punishing with out-of-school suspensions) within one school district. We frame this study in DisCrit and QuantCrit frameworks to connect data-based decision making to sociocultural understandings of the ways in which schools use both special education and discipline to simultaneously provide and limit opportunities for different student groups. Results showed a complex interconnectedness between student sociodemographic labels (e.g., gender, race, and socioeconomic status) and factors associated with both special education identification and exclusionary discipline. Our findings suggest that quantitative studies lacking in-depth theoretical justification may perpetuate deficit understandings of the racialization of disability and intersections with exclusionary discipline.https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211041354
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rebecca A. Cruz
Saili S. Kulkarni
Allison R. Firestone
spellingShingle Rebecca A. Cruz
Saili S. Kulkarni
Allison R. Firestone
A QuantCrit Analysis of Context, Discipline, Special Education, and Disproportionality
AERA Open
author_facet Rebecca A. Cruz
Saili S. Kulkarni
Allison R. Firestone
author_sort Rebecca A. Cruz
title A QuantCrit Analysis of Context, Discipline, Special Education, and Disproportionality
title_short A QuantCrit Analysis of Context, Discipline, Special Education, and Disproportionality
title_full A QuantCrit Analysis of Context, Discipline, Special Education, and Disproportionality
title_fullStr A QuantCrit Analysis of Context, Discipline, Special Education, and Disproportionality
title_full_unstemmed A QuantCrit Analysis of Context, Discipline, Special Education, and Disproportionality
title_sort quantcrit analysis of context, discipline, special education, and disproportionality
publisher SAGE Publishing
series AERA Open
issn 2332-8584
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Using a dis/ability critical race theory (DisCrit) and critical quantitative (QuantCrit) lens, we examine disproportionate application of exclusionary discipline on multiply marginalized youth, foregrounding systemic injustice and institutionalized racism. In doing so, we examined temporal-, student-, and school-level factors that may result in exclusion and othering (i.e., placing into special education and punishing with out-of-school suspensions) within one school district. We frame this study in DisCrit and QuantCrit frameworks to connect data-based decision making to sociocultural understandings of the ways in which schools use both special education and discipline to simultaneously provide and limit opportunities for different student groups. Results showed a complex interconnectedness between student sociodemographic labels (e.g., gender, race, and socioeconomic status) and factors associated with both special education identification and exclusionary discipline. Our findings suggest that quantitative studies lacking in-depth theoretical justification may perpetuate deficit understandings of the racialization of disability and intersections with exclusionary discipline.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211041354
work_keys_str_mv AT rebeccaacruz aquantcritanalysisofcontextdisciplinespecialeducationanddisproportionality
AT sailiskulkarni aquantcritanalysisofcontextdisciplinespecialeducationanddisproportionality
AT allisonrfirestone aquantcritanalysisofcontextdisciplinespecialeducationanddisproportionality
AT rebeccaacruz quantcritanalysisofcontextdisciplinespecialeducationanddisproportionality
AT sailiskulkarni quantcritanalysisofcontextdisciplinespecialeducationanddisproportionality
AT allisonrfirestone quantcritanalysisofcontextdisciplinespecialeducationanddisproportionality
_version_ 1721196317225517056