Electrophysiological Rotor Ablation in In-Silico Modeling of Atrial Fibrillation: Comparisons with Dominant Frequency, Shannon Entropy, and Phase Singularity.

Although rotors have been considered among the drivers of atrial fibrillation (AF), the rotor definition is inconsistent. We evaluated the nature of rotors in 2D and 3D in- silico models of persistent AF (PeAF) by analyzing phase singularity (PS), dominant frequency (DF), Shannon entropy (ShEn), and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Minki Hwang, Jun-Seop Song, Young-Seon Lee, Changyong Li, Eun Bo Shim, Hui-Nam Pak
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4766081?pdf=render
id doaj-5e828476b3164cc480f1fa6ad2d94af4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5e828476b3164cc480f1fa6ad2d94af42020-11-25T01:44:58ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01112e014969510.1371/journal.pone.0149695Electrophysiological Rotor Ablation in In-Silico Modeling of Atrial Fibrillation: Comparisons with Dominant Frequency, Shannon Entropy, and Phase Singularity.Minki HwangJun-Seop SongYoung-Seon LeeChangyong LiEun Bo ShimHui-Nam PakAlthough rotors have been considered among the drivers of atrial fibrillation (AF), the rotor definition is inconsistent. We evaluated the nature of rotors in 2D and 3D in- silico models of persistent AF (PeAF) by analyzing phase singularity (PS), dominant frequency (DF), Shannon entropy (ShEn), and complex fractionated atrial electrogram cycle length (CFAE-CL) and their ablation.Mother rotor was spatiotemporally defined as stationary reentries with a meandering tip remaining within half the wavelength and lasting longer than 5 s. We generated 2D- and 3D-maps of the PS, DF, ShEn, and CFAE-CL during AF. The spatial correlations and ablation outcomes targeting each parameter were analyzed.1. In the 2D PeAF model, we observed a mother rotor that matched relatively well with DF (>9 Hz, 71.0%, p<0.001), ShEn (upper 2.5%, 33.2%, p<0.001), and CFAE-CL (lower 2.5%, 23.7%, p<0.001). 2. The 3D-PeAF model also showed mother rotors that had spatial correlations with DF (>5.5 Hz, 39.7%, p<0.001), ShEn (upper 8.5%, 15.1%, p <0.001), and CFAE (lower 8.5%, 8.0%, p = 0.002). 3. In both the 2D and 3D models, virtual ablation targeting the upper 5% of the DF terminated AF within 20 s, but not the ablations based on long-lasting PS, high ShEn area, or lower CFAE-CL area.Mother rotors were observed in both 2D and 3D human AF models. Rotor locations were well represented by DF, and their virtual ablation altered wave dynamics and terminated AF.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4766081?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Minki Hwang
Jun-Seop Song
Young-Seon Lee
Changyong Li
Eun Bo Shim
Hui-Nam Pak
spellingShingle Minki Hwang
Jun-Seop Song
Young-Seon Lee
Changyong Li
Eun Bo Shim
Hui-Nam Pak
Electrophysiological Rotor Ablation in In-Silico Modeling of Atrial Fibrillation: Comparisons with Dominant Frequency, Shannon Entropy, and Phase Singularity.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Minki Hwang
Jun-Seop Song
Young-Seon Lee
Changyong Li
Eun Bo Shim
Hui-Nam Pak
author_sort Minki Hwang
title Electrophysiological Rotor Ablation in In-Silico Modeling of Atrial Fibrillation: Comparisons with Dominant Frequency, Shannon Entropy, and Phase Singularity.
title_short Electrophysiological Rotor Ablation in In-Silico Modeling of Atrial Fibrillation: Comparisons with Dominant Frequency, Shannon Entropy, and Phase Singularity.
title_full Electrophysiological Rotor Ablation in In-Silico Modeling of Atrial Fibrillation: Comparisons with Dominant Frequency, Shannon Entropy, and Phase Singularity.
title_fullStr Electrophysiological Rotor Ablation in In-Silico Modeling of Atrial Fibrillation: Comparisons with Dominant Frequency, Shannon Entropy, and Phase Singularity.
title_full_unstemmed Electrophysiological Rotor Ablation in In-Silico Modeling of Atrial Fibrillation: Comparisons with Dominant Frequency, Shannon Entropy, and Phase Singularity.
title_sort electrophysiological rotor ablation in in-silico modeling of atrial fibrillation: comparisons with dominant frequency, shannon entropy, and phase singularity.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Although rotors have been considered among the drivers of atrial fibrillation (AF), the rotor definition is inconsistent. We evaluated the nature of rotors in 2D and 3D in- silico models of persistent AF (PeAF) by analyzing phase singularity (PS), dominant frequency (DF), Shannon entropy (ShEn), and complex fractionated atrial electrogram cycle length (CFAE-CL) and their ablation.Mother rotor was spatiotemporally defined as stationary reentries with a meandering tip remaining within half the wavelength and lasting longer than 5 s. We generated 2D- and 3D-maps of the PS, DF, ShEn, and CFAE-CL during AF. The spatial correlations and ablation outcomes targeting each parameter were analyzed.1. In the 2D PeAF model, we observed a mother rotor that matched relatively well with DF (>9 Hz, 71.0%, p<0.001), ShEn (upper 2.5%, 33.2%, p<0.001), and CFAE-CL (lower 2.5%, 23.7%, p<0.001). 2. The 3D-PeAF model also showed mother rotors that had spatial correlations with DF (>5.5 Hz, 39.7%, p<0.001), ShEn (upper 8.5%, 15.1%, p <0.001), and CFAE (lower 8.5%, 8.0%, p = 0.002). 3. In both the 2D and 3D models, virtual ablation targeting the upper 5% of the DF terminated AF within 20 s, but not the ablations based on long-lasting PS, high ShEn area, or lower CFAE-CL area.Mother rotors were observed in both 2D and 3D human AF models. Rotor locations were well represented by DF, and their virtual ablation altered wave dynamics and terminated AF.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4766081?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT minkihwang electrophysiologicalrotorablationininsilicomodelingofatrialfibrillationcomparisonswithdominantfrequencyshannonentropyandphasesingularity
AT junseopsong electrophysiologicalrotorablationininsilicomodelingofatrialfibrillationcomparisonswithdominantfrequencyshannonentropyandphasesingularity
AT youngseonlee electrophysiologicalrotorablationininsilicomodelingofatrialfibrillationcomparisonswithdominantfrequencyshannonentropyandphasesingularity
AT changyongli electrophysiologicalrotorablationininsilicomodelingofatrialfibrillationcomparisonswithdominantfrequencyshannonentropyandphasesingularity
AT eunboshim electrophysiologicalrotorablationininsilicomodelingofatrialfibrillationcomparisonswithdominantfrequencyshannonentropyandphasesingularity
AT huinampak electrophysiologicalrotorablationininsilicomodelingofatrialfibrillationcomparisonswithdominantfrequencyshannonentropyandphasesingularity
_version_ 1725026017181958144