Changes in the Perceived Epidemiology of Primary Hyperaldosteronism

Primary aldosteronism has been considered a rare disease in the past years, affecting 1% of the hypertensive population. Subsequently, growing evidence of its higher prevalence is present in literature, although the estimates of disease range from 5 up to 20%, as in type 2 diabetes and resistant hyp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Riccardo Maria Fagugli, Chiara Taglioni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2011-01-01
Series:International Journal of Hypertension
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/162804
id doaj-5e7f745ecb574636a7503b2d3faef1bd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5e7f745ecb574636a7503b2d3faef1bd2020-11-24T21:08:47ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Hypertension2090-03922011-01-01201110.4061/2011/162804162804Changes in the Perceived Epidemiology of Primary HyperaldosteronismRiccardo Maria Fagugli0Chiara Taglioni1S. C. Nefrologia e Dialisi, Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, S. Andrea delle Fratte, 06129 Perugia, ItalyS. C. Nefrologia e Dialisi, Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia, S. Andrea delle Fratte, 06129 Perugia, ItalyPrimary aldosteronism has been considered a rare disease in the past years, affecting 1% of the hypertensive population. Subsequently, growing evidence of its higher prevalence is present in literature, although the estimates of disease range from 5 up to 20%, as in type 2 diabetes and resistant hypertension. The main reasons for these variations are associated with the selection of patients and diagnostic procedures. If we consider that hypertension is present in about 20% of the adult population, primary aldosteronism can no longer be considered a rare disease. Patients with primary aldosteronism have a high incidence of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and kidney complications. The identification of these patients has therefore a practical value on therapy, and to control morbidities derived from vascular damage. The ability to identify the prevalence of a disease depends on the number of subjects studied and the methods of investigation. Epidemiological studies are affected by these two problems: there is not consensus on patients who need to be investigated, although testing is recommended in subjects with resistant hypertension and diabetes. The question of how to determine aldosterone and renin levels is open, particularly if pharmacological wash-out is difficult to perform because of inadequate blood pressure control.http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/162804
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Riccardo Maria Fagugli
Chiara Taglioni
spellingShingle Riccardo Maria Fagugli
Chiara Taglioni
Changes in the Perceived Epidemiology of Primary Hyperaldosteronism
International Journal of Hypertension
author_facet Riccardo Maria Fagugli
Chiara Taglioni
author_sort Riccardo Maria Fagugli
title Changes in the Perceived Epidemiology of Primary Hyperaldosteronism
title_short Changes in the Perceived Epidemiology of Primary Hyperaldosteronism
title_full Changes in the Perceived Epidemiology of Primary Hyperaldosteronism
title_fullStr Changes in the Perceived Epidemiology of Primary Hyperaldosteronism
title_full_unstemmed Changes in the Perceived Epidemiology of Primary Hyperaldosteronism
title_sort changes in the perceived epidemiology of primary hyperaldosteronism
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Hypertension
issn 2090-0392
publishDate 2011-01-01
description Primary aldosteronism has been considered a rare disease in the past years, affecting 1% of the hypertensive population. Subsequently, growing evidence of its higher prevalence is present in literature, although the estimates of disease range from 5 up to 20%, as in type 2 diabetes and resistant hypertension. The main reasons for these variations are associated with the selection of patients and diagnostic procedures. If we consider that hypertension is present in about 20% of the adult population, primary aldosteronism can no longer be considered a rare disease. Patients with primary aldosteronism have a high incidence of cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and kidney complications. The identification of these patients has therefore a practical value on therapy, and to control morbidities derived from vascular damage. The ability to identify the prevalence of a disease depends on the number of subjects studied and the methods of investigation. Epidemiological studies are affected by these two problems: there is not consensus on patients who need to be investigated, although testing is recommended in subjects with resistant hypertension and diabetes. The question of how to determine aldosterone and renin levels is open, particularly if pharmacological wash-out is difficult to perform because of inadequate blood pressure control.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.4061/2011/162804
work_keys_str_mv AT riccardomariafagugli changesintheperceivedepidemiologyofprimaryhyperaldosteronism
AT chiarataglioni changesintheperceivedepidemiologyofprimaryhyperaldosteronism
_version_ 1716759415324934144