A clinical method for estimating the modulus of elasticity of the human cornea in vivo.

BACKGROUND:To develop a method, using current clinical instrumentation, to estimate the Young's modulus of the human cornea in vivo. METHODS:Central corneal curvature (CCC), central corneal thickness(CCT), intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured with the Goldmann tonometer (IOPG) and the Pascal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: David C Pye
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224824
id doaj-5e7e209bdc794068840d341a4afa858b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5e7e209bdc794068840d341a4afa858b2021-03-03T21:19:47ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01151e022482410.1371/journal.pone.0224824A clinical method for estimating the modulus of elasticity of the human cornea in vivo.David C PyeBACKGROUND:To develop a method, using current clinical instrumentation, to estimate the Young's modulus of the human cornea in vivo. METHODS:Central corneal curvature (CCC), central corneal thickness(CCT), intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured with the Goldmann tonometer (IOPG) and the Pascal Dynamic Corneal Tonometer(PDCT) in one eye of 100 normal young human subjects (21.07 ± 2.94 years) in vivo. The Orssengo and Pye algorithm was used to calculate the Young's modulus of the corneas of these subjects. RESULTS:The Young's modulus(E) of the corneas of the subjects using the PDCT and IOPG results (Ecalc) was 0.25 ± 0.10MPa, and without the PDCT results (Eiopg) was 0.29 ± 0.06MPa. The difference in these results is due to the difference in tonometry results between the two instruments, as the mean PDCT result for the subjects was 16.89 ± 2.49mmHg and the IOPG result 15.06 ± 2.71mmHg. E was affected by the CCC of the subjects but more particularly by the CCT and IOP measurements. Corneal stiffness results are also presented. CONCLUSION:Two methods have been developed to estimate the Young's modulus of the human cornea in vivo using current clinical instrumentation. One method (Ecalc) is applicable to the general corneal condition, and Eiopg to the normal cornea, and these results can be used to calculate corneal stiffness.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224824
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author David C Pye
spellingShingle David C Pye
A clinical method for estimating the modulus of elasticity of the human cornea in vivo.
PLoS ONE
author_facet David C Pye
author_sort David C Pye
title A clinical method for estimating the modulus of elasticity of the human cornea in vivo.
title_short A clinical method for estimating the modulus of elasticity of the human cornea in vivo.
title_full A clinical method for estimating the modulus of elasticity of the human cornea in vivo.
title_fullStr A clinical method for estimating the modulus of elasticity of the human cornea in vivo.
title_full_unstemmed A clinical method for estimating the modulus of elasticity of the human cornea in vivo.
title_sort clinical method for estimating the modulus of elasticity of the human cornea in vivo.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description BACKGROUND:To develop a method, using current clinical instrumentation, to estimate the Young's modulus of the human cornea in vivo. METHODS:Central corneal curvature (CCC), central corneal thickness(CCT), intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured with the Goldmann tonometer (IOPG) and the Pascal Dynamic Corneal Tonometer(PDCT) in one eye of 100 normal young human subjects (21.07 ± 2.94 years) in vivo. The Orssengo and Pye algorithm was used to calculate the Young's modulus of the corneas of these subjects. RESULTS:The Young's modulus(E) of the corneas of the subjects using the PDCT and IOPG results (Ecalc) was 0.25 ± 0.10MPa, and without the PDCT results (Eiopg) was 0.29 ± 0.06MPa. The difference in these results is due to the difference in tonometry results between the two instruments, as the mean PDCT result for the subjects was 16.89 ± 2.49mmHg and the IOPG result 15.06 ± 2.71mmHg. E was affected by the CCC of the subjects but more particularly by the CCT and IOP measurements. Corneal stiffness results are also presented. CONCLUSION:Two methods have been developed to estimate the Young's modulus of the human cornea in vivo using current clinical instrumentation. One method (Ecalc) is applicable to the general corneal condition, and Eiopg to the normal cornea, and these results can be used to calculate corneal stiffness.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224824
work_keys_str_mv AT davidcpye aclinicalmethodforestimatingthemodulusofelasticityofthehumancorneainvivo
AT davidcpye clinicalmethodforestimatingthemodulusofelasticityofthehumancorneainvivo
_version_ 1714817459608879104