Assessment Methods of Usability and Cognitive Workload of Rehabilitative Exoskeletons: A Systematic Review

Robotic exoskeleton technologies are applied in the medical field to help patients with impaired mobility to recover their motor functions. Relevant literature shows that usability and cognitive workload may influence the patients’ likelihood to benefit from the use of rehabilitative exoskeletons. F...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura Maria Alessandra La Bara, Luca Meloni, Davide Giusino, Luca Pietrantoni
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-08-01
Series:Applied Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/15/7146
id doaj-5e7e0d9fb6134449b3341f95d9d7793b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5e7e0d9fb6134449b3341f95d9d7793b2021-08-06T15:19:54ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172021-08-01117146714610.3390/app11157146Assessment Methods of Usability and Cognitive Workload of Rehabilitative Exoskeletons: A Systematic ReviewLaura Maria Alessandra La Bara0Luca Meloni1Davide Giusino2Luca Pietrantoni3Department of Psychology, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, ItalyDepartment of Psychology, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, ItalyDepartment of Psychology, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, ItalyDepartment of Psychology, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, ItalyRobotic exoskeleton technologies are applied in the medical field to help patients with impaired mobility to recover their motor functions. Relevant literature shows that usability and cognitive workload may influence the patients’ likelihood to benefit from the use of rehabilitative exoskeletons. Following the PRISMA method, the present study aimed to systematically review the assessment methods of usability and cognitive workload in the use of exoskeletal devices for motor rehabilitation. The literature search was conducted in the Scopus and Web of Science bibliographical databases, using 16 keywords that were combined into one search query. A final sample of 23 articles was included in the review, from which 18 distinct assessment methods were identified. Of them, 15 aimed to assess usability, whereas 3 aimed to assess cognitive workload in the use of rehabilitative exoskeletons. Some of the identified methods (e.g., SUS, QUEST, SWAT, and NASA-TLX) showed good psychometric properties and were therefore proven to be appropriate to assess usability and cognitive workload while performing exoskeleton-based rehabilitation. The current study may contribute to the development of guidelines and analytical tools for exoskeletons’ usability and exoskeleton-related patients’ cognitive workload in the domain of medical rehabilitation.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/15/7146exoskeletonsrehabilitationusabilitycognitive workloadassessment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Laura Maria Alessandra La Bara
Luca Meloni
Davide Giusino
Luca Pietrantoni
spellingShingle Laura Maria Alessandra La Bara
Luca Meloni
Davide Giusino
Luca Pietrantoni
Assessment Methods of Usability and Cognitive Workload of Rehabilitative Exoskeletons: A Systematic Review
Applied Sciences
exoskeletons
rehabilitation
usability
cognitive workload
assessment
author_facet Laura Maria Alessandra La Bara
Luca Meloni
Davide Giusino
Luca Pietrantoni
author_sort Laura Maria Alessandra La Bara
title Assessment Methods of Usability and Cognitive Workload of Rehabilitative Exoskeletons: A Systematic Review
title_short Assessment Methods of Usability and Cognitive Workload of Rehabilitative Exoskeletons: A Systematic Review
title_full Assessment Methods of Usability and Cognitive Workload of Rehabilitative Exoskeletons: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Assessment Methods of Usability and Cognitive Workload of Rehabilitative Exoskeletons: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Assessment Methods of Usability and Cognitive Workload of Rehabilitative Exoskeletons: A Systematic Review
title_sort assessment methods of usability and cognitive workload of rehabilitative exoskeletons: a systematic review
publisher MDPI AG
series Applied Sciences
issn 2076-3417
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Robotic exoskeleton technologies are applied in the medical field to help patients with impaired mobility to recover their motor functions. Relevant literature shows that usability and cognitive workload may influence the patients’ likelihood to benefit from the use of rehabilitative exoskeletons. Following the PRISMA method, the present study aimed to systematically review the assessment methods of usability and cognitive workload in the use of exoskeletal devices for motor rehabilitation. The literature search was conducted in the Scopus and Web of Science bibliographical databases, using 16 keywords that were combined into one search query. A final sample of 23 articles was included in the review, from which 18 distinct assessment methods were identified. Of them, 15 aimed to assess usability, whereas 3 aimed to assess cognitive workload in the use of rehabilitative exoskeletons. Some of the identified methods (e.g., SUS, QUEST, SWAT, and NASA-TLX) showed good psychometric properties and were therefore proven to be appropriate to assess usability and cognitive workload while performing exoskeleton-based rehabilitation. The current study may contribute to the development of guidelines and analytical tools for exoskeletons’ usability and exoskeleton-related patients’ cognitive workload in the domain of medical rehabilitation.
topic exoskeletons
rehabilitation
usability
cognitive workload
assessment
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/15/7146
work_keys_str_mv AT lauramariaalessandralabara assessmentmethodsofusabilityandcognitiveworkloadofrehabilitativeexoskeletonsasystematicreview
AT lucameloni assessmentmethodsofusabilityandcognitiveworkloadofrehabilitativeexoskeletonsasystematicreview
AT davidegiusino assessmentmethodsofusabilityandcognitiveworkloadofrehabilitativeexoskeletonsasystematicreview
AT lucapietrantoni assessmentmethodsofusabilityandcognitiveworkloadofrehabilitativeexoskeletonsasystematicreview
_version_ 1721218809883262976