Performance Analysis of Different Types of Sensor Networks for Cognitive Radios
We consider the problem of using multiple sensors to detect whether a certain spectrum is occupied or not. Each sensor sends its spectrum sensing result to a data fusion center, which combines all the results for an overall decision. With the existence of wireless fading on the channels from sensors...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi Limited
2012-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/632762 |
id |
doaj-5e61987e062c49678deeb9c02f665e6e |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5e61987e062c49678deeb9c02f665e6e2021-07-02T07:55:15ZengHindawi LimitedJournal of Electrical and Computer Engineering2090-01472090-01552012-01-01201210.1155/2012/632762632762Performance Analysis of Different Types of Sensor Networks for Cognitive RadiosChunxuan Ye0Zinan Lin1Alpaslan Demir2Yan Li3InterDigital Communications, LLC, King of Prussia, PA 19406, USAInterDigital Communications, LLC, King of Prussia, PA 19406, USAInterDigital Communications, LLC, King of Prussia, PA 19406, USAInterDigital Communications, LLC, King of Prussia, PA 19406, USAWe consider the problem of using multiple sensors to detect whether a certain spectrum is occupied or not. Each sensor sends its spectrum sensing result to a data fusion center, which combines all the results for an overall decision. With the existence of wireless fading on the channels from sensors to data fusion center, we examine three different mechanisms on the transmissions from sensors to data fusion center: (1) direct transmissions; (2) transmissions with the assistance of relays and (3) transmissions with the assistance of an intermediate fusion helper which fuses the sensing results from the sensors and sends the fused result to the data fusion center. For each mechanism, we analyze the correct probability of the overall decision made by the data fusion center. Our evaluation establishes that a sensor network with an intermediate fusion helper performs almost as good as a sensor network with relays, but providing energy and spectral advantages. Both networks significantly outperform the sensor network without relay or intermediate fusion helper. Such analysis facilitates the design of sensor networks. Furthermore, we generalize this evaluation to sensor networks with an arbitrary number of sensors and to sensor networks applying various information combining rules. Our simulations validate the analytical results.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/632762 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Chunxuan Ye Zinan Lin Alpaslan Demir Yan Li |
spellingShingle |
Chunxuan Ye Zinan Lin Alpaslan Demir Yan Li Performance Analysis of Different Types of Sensor Networks for Cognitive Radios Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering |
author_facet |
Chunxuan Ye Zinan Lin Alpaslan Demir Yan Li |
author_sort |
Chunxuan Ye |
title |
Performance Analysis of Different Types of Sensor Networks for Cognitive Radios |
title_short |
Performance Analysis of Different Types of Sensor Networks for Cognitive Radios |
title_full |
Performance Analysis of Different Types of Sensor Networks for Cognitive Radios |
title_fullStr |
Performance Analysis of Different Types of Sensor Networks for Cognitive Radios |
title_full_unstemmed |
Performance Analysis of Different Types of Sensor Networks for Cognitive Radios |
title_sort |
performance analysis of different types of sensor networks for cognitive radios |
publisher |
Hindawi Limited |
series |
Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering |
issn |
2090-0147 2090-0155 |
publishDate |
2012-01-01 |
description |
We consider the problem of using multiple sensors to detect whether a certain spectrum is occupied or not. Each sensor sends its spectrum sensing result to a data fusion center, which combines all the results for an overall decision. With the existence of wireless fading on the channels from sensors to data fusion center, we examine three different mechanisms on the transmissions from sensors to data fusion center: (1) direct transmissions; (2) transmissions with the assistance of relays and (3) transmissions with the assistance of an intermediate fusion helper which fuses the sensing results from the sensors and sends the fused result to the data fusion center. For each mechanism, we analyze the correct probability of the overall decision made by the data fusion center. Our evaluation establishes that a sensor network with an intermediate fusion helper performs almost as good as a sensor network with relays, but providing energy and spectral advantages. Both networks significantly outperform the sensor network without relay or intermediate fusion helper. Such analysis facilitates the design of sensor networks. Furthermore, we generalize this evaluation to sensor networks with an arbitrary number of sensors and to sensor networks applying various information combining rules. Our simulations validate the analytical results. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/632762 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT chunxuanye performanceanalysisofdifferenttypesofsensornetworksforcognitiveradios AT zinanlin performanceanalysisofdifferenttypesofsensornetworksforcognitiveradios AT alpaslandemir performanceanalysisofdifferenttypesofsensornetworksforcognitiveradios AT yanli performanceanalysisofdifferenttypesofsensornetworksforcognitiveradios |
_version_ |
1721335347800965120 |