Aspirin-free antithrombotic management following coronary stenting. Myth or reality?

ABSTRACT The use of aspirin in combination with a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, also known as dual antiplatelet therapy, is at the cornerstone of treatment for patients undergoing coronary stenting. The use of newer generation P2Y12 inhibitors (ie, prasugrel and ticagrelor), characterized by more potent...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Davide Capodanno, Roxana Mehran, Dominick J. Angiolillo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Permanyer 2019-02-01
Series:REC: Interventional Cardiology (English Ed.)
Subjects:
Online Access:https://recintervcardiol.org/en/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=108
id doaj-5e6156530e194b8a82a1011f167db035
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5e6156530e194b8a82a1011f167db0352021-09-01T10:19:37ZengPermanyerREC: Interventional Cardiology (English Ed.)2604-73222019-02-0111626610.24875/RECICE.M19000016Aspirin-free antithrombotic management following coronary stenting. Myth or reality?Davide Capodanno0Roxana Mehran1Dominick J. Angiolillo2Division of Cardiology, CAST, P.O. “Rodolico”, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria “Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele”, University of Catania, Catania, ItalyIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United StatesDivision of Cardiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Jacksonville, FL, United StatesABSTRACT The use of aspirin in combination with a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, also known as dual antiplatelet therapy, is at the cornerstone of treatment for patients undergoing coronary stenting. The use of newer generation P2Y12 inhibitors (ie, prasugrel and ticagrelor), characterized by more potent antiplatelet effects and better clinical outcomes compared to clopidogrel, are recommended in high-risk patients, such as those with an acute coronary syndrome. However, this occurs at the expense of increased bleeding that accumulates with the duration of treatment. Given the poor prognostic implication, including an increased mortality rate associated with bleeding, a number of strategies aimed at reducing the risk of this adverse event while preserving efficacy have emerged. Among these, withdrawing aspirin represents an ongoing line of clinical investigation. The pharmacological reason behind such strategy relies on the central role played by the metabolic pathway of P2Y12 receptor inhibitors on platelet activation and its contribution amplifying thrombotic processes. Thus, it has been hypothesized that in the presence of a powerful P2Y12 receptor blockade, aspirin may offer minimal contribution when it comes to reducing thrombotic complications, but rather contribute to increased bleeding complications. A number of ongoing clinical investigations are currently challenging the dogma of aspirin as a mandatory background therapy in patients undergoing coronary stenting.https://recintervcardiol.org/en/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=108Aspirin Ticagrelor Stent Thrombosis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Davide Capodanno
Roxana Mehran
Dominick J. Angiolillo
spellingShingle Davide Capodanno
Roxana Mehran
Dominick J. Angiolillo
Aspirin-free antithrombotic management following coronary stenting. Myth or reality?
REC: Interventional Cardiology (English Ed.)
Aspirin
Ticagrelor
Stent
Thrombosis
author_facet Davide Capodanno
Roxana Mehran
Dominick J. Angiolillo
author_sort Davide Capodanno
title Aspirin-free antithrombotic management following coronary stenting. Myth or reality?
title_short Aspirin-free antithrombotic management following coronary stenting. Myth or reality?
title_full Aspirin-free antithrombotic management following coronary stenting. Myth or reality?
title_fullStr Aspirin-free antithrombotic management following coronary stenting. Myth or reality?
title_full_unstemmed Aspirin-free antithrombotic management following coronary stenting. Myth or reality?
title_sort aspirin-free antithrombotic management following coronary stenting. myth or reality?
publisher Permanyer
series REC: Interventional Cardiology (English Ed.)
issn 2604-7322
publishDate 2019-02-01
description ABSTRACT The use of aspirin in combination with a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, also known as dual antiplatelet therapy, is at the cornerstone of treatment for patients undergoing coronary stenting. The use of newer generation P2Y12 inhibitors (ie, prasugrel and ticagrelor), characterized by more potent antiplatelet effects and better clinical outcomes compared to clopidogrel, are recommended in high-risk patients, such as those with an acute coronary syndrome. However, this occurs at the expense of increased bleeding that accumulates with the duration of treatment. Given the poor prognostic implication, including an increased mortality rate associated with bleeding, a number of strategies aimed at reducing the risk of this adverse event while preserving efficacy have emerged. Among these, withdrawing aspirin represents an ongoing line of clinical investigation. The pharmacological reason behind such strategy relies on the central role played by the metabolic pathway of P2Y12 receptor inhibitors on platelet activation and its contribution amplifying thrombotic processes. Thus, it has been hypothesized that in the presence of a powerful P2Y12 receptor blockade, aspirin may offer minimal contribution when it comes to reducing thrombotic complications, but rather contribute to increased bleeding complications. A number of ongoing clinical investigations are currently challenging the dogma of aspirin as a mandatory background therapy in patients undergoing coronary stenting.
topic Aspirin
Ticagrelor
Stent
Thrombosis
url https://recintervcardiol.org/en/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=108
work_keys_str_mv AT davidecapodanno aspirinfreeantithromboticmanagementfollowingcoronarystentingmythorreality
AT roxanamehran aspirinfreeantithromboticmanagementfollowingcoronarystentingmythorreality
AT dominickjangiolillo aspirinfreeantithromboticmanagementfollowingcoronarystentingmythorreality
_version_ 1721182837455978496