Efficacies of the new Paclitaxel-eluting Coroflex Please™ Stent in percutaneous coronary intervention; comparison of efficacy between Coroflex Please™ and Taxus™ (ECO-PLEASANT) trial: study rationale and design
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Previous randomized trials have showed the superiority of Paclitaxel-eluting stent over bare metal stent in angiographic and clinical outcomes. Coroflex Please™ stent is a newly developed drug eluting stent using the Coroflex™ stent...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2009-10-01
|
Series: | Trials |
Online Access: | http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/10/1/98 |
id |
doaj-5e5f718d2d12447dad7b7a51fe12ee40 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5e5f718d2d12447dad7b7a51fe12ee402020-11-24T23:17:50ZengBMCTrials1745-62152009-10-011019810.1186/1745-6215-10-98Efficacies of the new Paclitaxel-eluting Coroflex Please™ Stent in percutaneous coronary intervention; comparison of efficacy between Coroflex Please™ and Taxus™ (ECO-PLEASANT) trial: study rationale and designKim Doo-IlKim Soo-JoongYoun Tae-JinChung Woo-YoungLee Sang-GonChoi Jae-WoongMoon Keon-WoongKim Sang-WookBae Jang-HoPark Jong-SeonPark Kyung-WooJeon Hui-KyungSeo Jae-BinKim Byung-OkHyon Min-SuPark Keum-SooCha Tae-JoonHwang Hweung-KonHur Seung-HoKim Hyo-Soo<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Previous randomized trials have showed the superiority of Paclitaxel-eluting stent over bare metal stent in angiographic and clinical outcomes. Coroflex Please™ stent is a newly developed drug eluting stent using the Coroflex™ stent platform combined with the drug paclitaxel contained in a polymer coating. PECOPS I trial, one-arm observational study, showed that the clinical and angiographic outcomes of Coroflex Please™ stent were within the range of those of Taxus, the 1<sup>st </sup>generation paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES). However, there have been no studies directly comparing the Coroflex Please™ stent with the Taxus Liberte™ stent that is the newest version of Taxus. Therefore, prospective, randomized trial is required to demonstrate the non-inferiority of Coroflex Please™ stent compared with Taxus Liberte™ stent in a head-to-head manner.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In the comparison of Efficacy between COroflex PLEASe™ ANd Taxus™ stent(ECO-PLEASANT) trial, approximately 900 patients are being prospectively and randomly assigned to the either type of Coroflex Please™ stent and Taxus Liberte™ stent via web-based randomization. The primary endpoint is clinically driven target vessel revascularization at 9 months. The secondary endpoints include major cardiac adverse events, target vessel failure, stent thrombosis and angiographic efficacy endpoints.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>The ECO-PLEASANT trial is the study not yet performed to directly compare the efficacy and safety of the Coroflex Please™ versus Taxus Liberte™ stent. On the basis of this trial, we will be able to find out whether the Coroflex Please™ stent is non-inferior to Taxus Liberte™ stent or not.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00699543.</p> http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/10/1/98 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kim Doo-Il Kim Soo-Joong Youn Tae-Jin Chung Woo-Young Lee Sang-Gon Choi Jae-Woong Moon Keon-Woong Kim Sang-Wook Bae Jang-Ho Park Jong-Seon Park Kyung-Woo Jeon Hui-Kyung Seo Jae-Bin Kim Byung-Ok Hyon Min-Su Park Keum-Soo Cha Tae-Joon Hwang Hweung-Kon Hur Seung-Ho Kim Hyo-Soo |
spellingShingle |
Kim Doo-Il Kim Soo-Joong Youn Tae-Jin Chung Woo-Young Lee Sang-Gon Choi Jae-Woong Moon Keon-Woong Kim Sang-Wook Bae Jang-Ho Park Jong-Seon Park Kyung-Woo Jeon Hui-Kyung Seo Jae-Bin Kim Byung-Ok Hyon Min-Su Park Keum-Soo Cha Tae-Joon Hwang Hweung-Kon Hur Seung-Ho Kim Hyo-Soo Efficacies of the new Paclitaxel-eluting Coroflex Please™ Stent in percutaneous coronary intervention; comparison of efficacy between Coroflex Please™ and Taxus™ (ECO-PLEASANT) trial: study rationale and design Trials |
author_facet |
Kim Doo-Il Kim Soo-Joong Youn Tae-Jin Chung Woo-Young Lee Sang-Gon Choi Jae-Woong Moon Keon-Woong Kim Sang-Wook Bae Jang-Ho Park Jong-Seon Park Kyung-Woo Jeon Hui-Kyung Seo Jae-Bin Kim Byung-Ok Hyon Min-Su Park Keum-Soo Cha Tae-Joon Hwang Hweung-Kon Hur Seung-Ho Kim Hyo-Soo |
author_sort |
Kim Doo-Il |
title |
Efficacies of the new Paclitaxel-eluting Coroflex Please™ Stent in percutaneous coronary intervention; comparison of efficacy between Coroflex Please™ and Taxus™ (ECO-PLEASANT) trial: study rationale and design |
title_short |
Efficacies of the new Paclitaxel-eluting Coroflex Please™ Stent in percutaneous coronary intervention; comparison of efficacy between Coroflex Please™ and Taxus™ (ECO-PLEASANT) trial: study rationale and design |
title_full |
Efficacies of the new Paclitaxel-eluting Coroflex Please™ Stent in percutaneous coronary intervention; comparison of efficacy between Coroflex Please™ and Taxus™ (ECO-PLEASANT) trial: study rationale and design |
title_fullStr |
Efficacies of the new Paclitaxel-eluting Coroflex Please™ Stent in percutaneous coronary intervention; comparison of efficacy between Coroflex Please™ and Taxus™ (ECO-PLEASANT) trial: study rationale and design |
title_full_unstemmed |
Efficacies of the new Paclitaxel-eluting Coroflex Please™ Stent in percutaneous coronary intervention; comparison of efficacy between Coroflex Please™ and Taxus™ (ECO-PLEASANT) trial: study rationale and design |
title_sort |
efficacies of the new paclitaxel-eluting coroflex please™ stent in percutaneous coronary intervention; comparison of efficacy between coroflex please™ and taxus™ (eco-pleasant) trial: study rationale and design |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Trials |
issn |
1745-6215 |
publishDate |
2009-10-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Previous randomized trials have showed the superiority of Paclitaxel-eluting stent over bare metal stent in angiographic and clinical outcomes. Coroflex Please™ stent is a newly developed drug eluting stent using the Coroflex™ stent platform combined with the drug paclitaxel contained in a polymer coating. PECOPS I trial, one-arm observational study, showed that the clinical and angiographic outcomes of Coroflex Please™ stent were within the range of those of Taxus, the 1<sup>st </sup>generation paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES). However, there have been no studies directly comparing the Coroflex Please™ stent with the Taxus Liberte™ stent that is the newest version of Taxus. Therefore, prospective, randomized trial is required to demonstrate the non-inferiority of Coroflex Please™ stent compared with Taxus Liberte™ stent in a head-to-head manner.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In the comparison of Efficacy between COroflex PLEASe™ ANd Taxus™ stent(ECO-PLEASANT) trial, approximately 900 patients are being prospectively and randomly assigned to the either type of Coroflex Please™ stent and Taxus Liberte™ stent via web-based randomization. The primary endpoint is clinically driven target vessel revascularization at 9 months. The secondary endpoints include major cardiac adverse events, target vessel failure, stent thrombosis and angiographic efficacy endpoints.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>The ECO-PLEASANT trial is the study not yet performed to directly compare the efficacy and safety of the Coroflex Please™ versus Taxus Liberte™ stent. On the basis of this trial, we will be able to find out whether the Coroflex Please™ stent is non-inferior to Taxus Liberte™ stent or not.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00699543.</p> |
url |
http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/10/1/98 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kimdooil efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign AT kimsoojoong efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign AT yountaejin efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign AT chungwooyoung efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign AT leesanggon efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign AT choijaewoong efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign AT moonkeonwoong efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign AT kimsangwook efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign AT baejangho efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign AT parkjongseon efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign AT parkkyungwoo efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign AT jeonhuikyung efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign AT seojaebin efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign AT kimbyungok efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign AT hyonminsu efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign AT parkkeumsoo efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign AT chataejoon efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign AT hwanghweungkon efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign AT hurseungho efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign AT kimhyosoo efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign |
_version_ |
1725583088859217920 |