Efficacies of the new Paclitaxel-eluting Coroflex Please™ Stent in percutaneous coronary intervention; comparison of efficacy between Coroflex Please™ and Taxus™ (ECO-PLEASANT) trial: study rationale and design

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Previous randomized trials have showed the superiority of Paclitaxel-eluting stent over bare metal stent in angiographic and clinical outcomes. Coroflex Please™ stent is a newly developed drug eluting stent using the Coroflex™ stent...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kim Doo-Il, Kim Soo-Joong, Youn Tae-Jin, Chung Woo-Young, Lee Sang-Gon, Choi Jae-Woong, Moon Keon-Woong, Kim Sang-Wook, Bae Jang-Ho, Park Jong-Seon, Park Kyung-Woo, Jeon Hui-Kyung, Seo Jae-Bin, Kim Byung-Ok, Hyon Min-Su, Park Keum-Soo, Cha Tae-Joon, Hwang Hweung-Kon, Hur Seung-Ho, Kim Hyo-Soo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2009-10-01
Series:Trials
Online Access:http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/10/1/98
id doaj-5e5f718d2d12447dad7b7a51fe12ee40
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5e5f718d2d12447dad7b7a51fe12ee402020-11-24T23:17:50ZengBMCTrials1745-62152009-10-011019810.1186/1745-6215-10-98Efficacies of the new Paclitaxel-eluting Coroflex Please™ Stent in percutaneous coronary intervention; comparison of efficacy between Coroflex Please™ and Taxus™ (ECO-PLEASANT) trial: study rationale and designKim Doo-IlKim Soo-JoongYoun Tae-JinChung Woo-YoungLee Sang-GonChoi Jae-WoongMoon Keon-WoongKim Sang-WookBae Jang-HoPark Jong-SeonPark Kyung-WooJeon Hui-KyungSeo Jae-BinKim Byung-OkHyon Min-SuPark Keum-SooCha Tae-JoonHwang Hweung-KonHur Seung-HoKim Hyo-Soo<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Previous randomized trials have showed the superiority of Paclitaxel-eluting stent over bare metal stent in angiographic and clinical outcomes. Coroflex Please™ stent is a newly developed drug eluting stent using the Coroflex™ stent platform combined with the drug paclitaxel contained in a polymer coating. PECOPS I trial, one-arm observational study, showed that the clinical and angiographic outcomes of Coroflex Please™ stent were within the range of those of Taxus, the 1<sup>st </sup>generation paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES). However, there have been no studies directly comparing the Coroflex Please™ stent with the Taxus Liberte™ stent that is the newest version of Taxus. Therefore, prospective, randomized trial is required to demonstrate the non-inferiority of Coroflex Please™ stent compared with Taxus Liberte™ stent in a head-to-head manner.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In the comparison of Efficacy between COroflex PLEASe™ ANd Taxus™ stent(ECO-PLEASANT) trial, approximately 900 patients are being prospectively and randomly assigned to the either type of Coroflex Please™ stent and Taxus Liberte™ stent via web-based randomization. The primary endpoint is clinically driven target vessel revascularization at 9 months. The secondary endpoints include major cardiac adverse events, target vessel failure, stent thrombosis and angiographic efficacy endpoints.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>The ECO-PLEASANT trial is the study not yet performed to directly compare the efficacy and safety of the Coroflex Please™ versus Taxus Liberte™ stent. On the basis of this trial, we will be able to find out whether the Coroflex Please™ stent is non-inferior to Taxus Liberte™ stent or not.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00699543.</p> http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/10/1/98
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kim Doo-Il
Kim Soo-Joong
Youn Tae-Jin
Chung Woo-Young
Lee Sang-Gon
Choi Jae-Woong
Moon Keon-Woong
Kim Sang-Wook
Bae Jang-Ho
Park Jong-Seon
Park Kyung-Woo
Jeon Hui-Kyung
Seo Jae-Bin
Kim Byung-Ok
Hyon Min-Su
Park Keum-Soo
Cha Tae-Joon
Hwang Hweung-Kon
Hur Seung-Ho
Kim Hyo-Soo
spellingShingle Kim Doo-Il
Kim Soo-Joong
Youn Tae-Jin
Chung Woo-Young
Lee Sang-Gon
Choi Jae-Woong
Moon Keon-Woong
Kim Sang-Wook
Bae Jang-Ho
Park Jong-Seon
Park Kyung-Woo
Jeon Hui-Kyung
Seo Jae-Bin
Kim Byung-Ok
Hyon Min-Su
Park Keum-Soo
Cha Tae-Joon
Hwang Hweung-Kon
Hur Seung-Ho
Kim Hyo-Soo
Efficacies of the new Paclitaxel-eluting Coroflex Please™ Stent in percutaneous coronary intervention; comparison of efficacy between Coroflex Please™ and Taxus™ (ECO-PLEASANT) trial: study rationale and design
Trials
author_facet Kim Doo-Il
Kim Soo-Joong
Youn Tae-Jin
Chung Woo-Young
Lee Sang-Gon
Choi Jae-Woong
Moon Keon-Woong
Kim Sang-Wook
Bae Jang-Ho
Park Jong-Seon
Park Kyung-Woo
Jeon Hui-Kyung
Seo Jae-Bin
Kim Byung-Ok
Hyon Min-Su
Park Keum-Soo
Cha Tae-Joon
Hwang Hweung-Kon
Hur Seung-Ho
Kim Hyo-Soo
author_sort Kim Doo-Il
title Efficacies of the new Paclitaxel-eluting Coroflex Please™ Stent in percutaneous coronary intervention; comparison of efficacy between Coroflex Please™ and Taxus™ (ECO-PLEASANT) trial: study rationale and design
title_short Efficacies of the new Paclitaxel-eluting Coroflex Please™ Stent in percutaneous coronary intervention; comparison of efficacy between Coroflex Please™ and Taxus™ (ECO-PLEASANT) trial: study rationale and design
title_full Efficacies of the new Paclitaxel-eluting Coroflex Please™ Stent in percutaneous coronary intervention; comparison of efficacy between Coroflex Please™ and Taxus™ (ECO-PLEASANT) trial: study rationale and design
title_fullStr Efficacies of the new Paclitaxel-eluting Coroflex Please™ Stent in percutaneous coronary intervention; comparison of efficacy between Coroflex Please™ and Taxus™ (ECO-PLEASANT) trial: study rationale and design
title_full_unstemmed Efficacies of the new Paclitaxel-eluting Coroflex Please™ Stent in percutaneous coronary intervention; comparison of efficacy between Coroflex Please™ and Taxus™ (ECO-PLEASANT) trial: study rationale and design
title_sort efficacies of the new paclitaxel-eluting coroflex please™ stent in percutaneous coronary intervention; comparison of efficacy between coroflex please™ and taxus™ (eco-pleasant) trial: study rationale and design
publisher BMC
series Trials
issn 1745-6215
publishDate 2009-10-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Previous randomized trials have showed the superiority of Paclitaxel-eluting stent over bare metal stent in angiographic and clinical outcomes. Coroflex Please™ stent is a newly developed drug eluting stent using the Coroflex™ stent platform combined with the drug paclitaxel contained in a polymer coating. PECOPS I trial, one-arm observational study, showed that the clinical and angiographic outcomes of Coroflex Please™ stent were within the range of those of Taxus, the 1<sup>st </sup>generation paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES). However, there have been no studies directly comparing the Coroflex Please™ stent with the Taxus Liberte™ stent that is the newest version of Taxus. Therefore, prospective, randomized trial is required to demonstrate the non-inferiority of Coroflex Please™ stent compared with Taxus Liberte™ stent in a head-to-head manner.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>In the comparison of Efficacy between COroflex PLEASe™ ANd Taxus™ stent(ECO-PLEASANT) trial, approximately 900 patients are being prospectively and randomly assigned to the either type of Coroflex Please™ stent and Taxus Liberte™ stent via web-based randomization. The primary endpoint is clinically driven target vessel revascularization at 9 months. The secondary endpoints include major cardiac adverse events, target vessel failure, stent thrombosis and angiographic efficacy endpoints.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>The ECO-PLEASANT trial is the study not yet performed to directly compare the efficacy and safety of the Coroflex Please™ versus Taxus Liberte™ stent. On the basis of this trial, we will be able to find out whether the Coroflex Please™ stent is non-inferior to Taxus Liberte™ stent or not.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00699543.</p>
url http://www.trialsjournal.com/content/10/1/98
work_keys_str_mv AT kimdooil efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign
AT kimsoojoong efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign
AT yountaejin efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign
AT chungwooyoung efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign
AT leesanggon efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign
AT choijaewoong efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign
AT moonkeonwoong efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign
AT kimsangwook efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign
AT baejangho efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign
AT parkjongseon efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign
AT parkkyungwoo efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign
AT jeonhuikyung efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign
AT seojaebin efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign
AT kimbyungok efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign
AT hyonminsu efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign
AT parkkeumsoo efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign
AT chataejoon efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign
AT hwanghweungkon efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign
AT hurseungho efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign
AT kimhyosoo efficaciesofthenewpaclitaxelelutingcoroflexpleasestentinpercutaneouscoronaryinterventioncomparisonofefficacybetweencoroflexpleaseandtaxusecopleasanttrialstudyrationaleanddesign
_version_ 1725583088859217920