Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Hazardous Gas Dispersion Prediction in Field Cases

Dispersion prediction plays a significant role in the management and emergency response to hazardous gas emissions and accidental leaks. Compared with conventional atmospheric dispersion models, machine leaning (ML) models have both high accuracy and efficiency in terms of prediction, especially in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rongxiao Wang, Bin Chen, Sihang Qiu, Zhengqiu Zhu, Yiduo Wang, Yiping Wang, Xiaogang Qiu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-07-01
Series:International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/7/1450
id doaj-5e49a51c1e394e22b335141e163b1aa3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5e49a51c1e394e22b335141e163b1aa32020-11-24T22:59:11ZengMDPI AGInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health1660-46012018-07-01157145010.3390/ijerph15071450ijerph15071450Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Hazardous Gas Dispersion Prediction in Field CasesRongxiao Wang0Bin Chen1Sihang Qiu2Zhengqiu Zhu3Yiduo Wang4Yiping Wang5Xiaogang Qiu6College of System Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, 109 Deya Road, Changsha 410073, ChinaCollege of System Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, 109 Deya Road, Changsha 410073, ChinaCollege of System Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, 109 Deya Road, Changsha 410073, ChinaCollege of System Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, 109 Deya Road, Changsha 410073, ChinaCollege of System Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, 109 Deya Road, Changsha 410073, ChinaThe Naval 902 Factory, Shanghai 200083, ChinaCollege of System Engineering, National University of Defense Technology, 109 Deya Road, Changsha 410073, ChinaDispersion prediction plays a significant role in the management and emergency response to hazardous gas emissions and accidental leaks. Compared with conventional atmospheric dispersion models, machine leaning (ML) models have both high accuracy and efficiency in terms of prediction, especially in field cases. However, selection of model type and the inputs of the ML model are still essential problems. To address this issue, two ML models (i.e., the back propagation (BP) network and support vector regression (SVR) with different input selections (i.e., original monitoring parameters and integrated Gaussian parameters) are proposed in this paper. To compare the performances of presented ML models in field cases, these models are evaluated using the Prairie Grass and Indianapolis field data sets. The influence of the training set scale on the performances of ML models is analyzed as well. Results demonstrate that the integrated Gaussian parameters indeed improve the prediction accuracy in the Prairie Grass case. However, they do not make much difference in the Indianapolis case due to their inadaptability to the complex terrain conditions. In addition, it can be summarized that the SVR shows better generalization ability with relatively small training sets, but tends to under-fit the training data. In contrast, the BP network has a stronger fitting ability, but sometimes suffers from an over-fitting problem. As a result, the model and input selection presented in this paper will be of great help to environmental and public health protection in real applications.http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/7/1450hazardous gas dispersion predictionback propagation networksupport vector regressioninput selectionfield case
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rongxiao Wang
Bin Chen
Sihang Qiu
Zhengqiu Zhu
Yiduo Wang
Yiping Wang
Xiaogang Qiu
spellingShingle Rongxiao Wang
Bin Chen
Sihang Qiu
Zhengqiu Zhu
Yiduo Wang
Yiping Wang
Xiaogang Qiu
Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Hazardous Gas Dispersion Prediction in Field Cases
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
hazardous gas dispersion prediction
back propagation network
support vector regression
input selection
field case
author_facet Rongxiao Wang
Bin Chen
Sihang Qiu
Zhengqiu Zhu
Yiduo Wang
Yiping Wang
Xiaogang Qiu
author_sort Rongxiao Wang
title Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Hazardous Gas Dispersion Prediction in Field Cases
title_short Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Hazardous Gas Dispersion Prediction in Field Cases
title_full Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Hazardous Gas Dispersion Prediction in Field Cases
title_fullStr Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Hazardous Gas Dispersion Prediction in Field Cases
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Hazardous Gas Dispersion Prediction in Field Cases
title_sort comparison of machine learning models for hazardous gas dispersion prediction in field cases
publisher MDPI AG
series International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
issn 1660-4601
publishDate 2018-07-01
description Dispersion prediction plays a significant role in the management and emergency response to hazardous gas emissions and accidental leaks. Compared with conventional atmospheric dispersion models, machine leaning (ML) models have both high accuracy and efficiency in terms of prediction, especially in field cases. However, selection of model type and the inputs of the ML model are still essential problems. To address this issue, two ML models (i.e., the back propagation (BP) network and support vector regression (SVR) with different input selections (i.e., original monitoring parameters and integrated Gaussian parameters) are proposed in this paper. To compare the performances of presented ML models in field cases, these models are evaluated using the Prairie Grass and Indianapolis field data sets. The influence of the training set scale on the performances of ML models is analyzed as well. Results demonstrate that the integrated Gaussian parameters indeed improve the prediction accuracy in the Prairie Grass case. However, they do not make much difference in the Indianapolis case due to their inadaptability to the complex terrain conditions. In addition, it can be summarized that the SVR shows better generalization ability with relatively small training sets, but tends to under-fit the training data. In contrast, the BP network has a stronger fitting ability, but sometimes suffers from an over-fitting problem. As a result, the model and input selection presented in this paper will be of great help to environmental and public health protection in real applications.
topic hazardous gas dispersion prediction
back propagation network
support vector regression
input selection
field case
url http://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/15/7/1450
work_keys_str_mv AT rongxiaowang comparisonofmachinelearningmodelsforhazardousgasdispersionpredictioninfieldcases
AT binchen comparisonofmachinelearningmodelsforhazardousgasdispersionpredictioninfieldcases
AT sihangqiu comparisonofmachinelearningmodelsforhazardousgasdispersionpredictioninfieldcases
AT zhengqiuzhu comparisonofmachinelearningmodelsforhazardousgasdispersionpredictioninfieldcases
AT yiduowang comparisonofmachinelearningmodelsforhazardousgasdispersionpredictioninfieldcases
AT yipingwang comparisonofmachinelearningmodelsforhazardousgasdispersionpredictioninfieldcases
AT xiaogangqiu comparisonofmachinelearningmodelsforhazardousgasdispersionpredictioninfieldcases
_version_ 1725645419443126272