Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic Review

While COVID-19 continues raging worldwide, effective vaccines are highly anticipated. However, vaccine hesitancy is widespread. Survey results on uptake intentions vary and continue to change. This review compared trends and synthesized findings in vaccination receptivity over time across US and int...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cheryl Lin, Pikuei Tu, Leslie M. Beitsch
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-12-01
Series:Vaccines
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/1/16
id doaj-5e11b05d94ae45ed9b5cdccff60b5339
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5e11b05d94ae45ed9b5cdccff60b53392020-12-31T00:04:08ZengMDPI AGVaccines2076-393X2021-12-019161610.3390/vaccines9010016Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic ReviewCheryl Lin0Pikuei Tu1Leslie M. Beitsch2Policy and Organizational Management Program, Duke University, 2204 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27705, USAPolicy and Organizational Management Program, Duke University, 2204 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27705, USADepartment of Behavioral Sciences and Social Medicine, Florida State University College of Medicine, 1115 W. Call St, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USAWhile COVID-19 continues raging worldwide, effective vaccines are highly anticipated. However, vaccine hesitancy is widespread. Survey results on uptake intentions vary and continue to change. This review compared trends and synthesized findings in vaccination receptivity over time across US and international polls, assessing survey design influences and evaluating context to inform policies and practices. Data sources included academic literature (PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO following PRISMA guidelines), news and official reports published by 20 October 2020. Two researchers independently screened potential peer-reviewed articles and syndicated polls for eligibility; 126 studies and surveys were selected. Declining vaccine acceptance (from >70% in March to <50% in October) with demographic, socioeconomic, and partisan divides was observed. Perceived risk, concerns over vaccine safety and effectiveness, doctors’ recommendations, and inoculation history were common factors. Impacts of regional infection rates, gender, and personal COVID-19 experience were inconclusive. Unique COVID-19 factors included political party orientation, doubts toward expedited development/approval process, and perceived political interference. Many receptive participants preferred to wait until others have taken the vaccine; mandates could increase resistance. Survey wording and answer options showed influence on responses. To achieve herd immunity, communication campaigns are immediately needed, focusing on transparency and restoring trust in health authorities.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/1/16vaccinesvaccine hesitancyimmunizationpublic healthhealth behaviorpublic opinion
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cheryl Lin
Pikuei Tu
Leslie M. Beitsch
spellingShingle Cheryl Lin
Pikuei Tu
Leslie M. Beitsch
Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic Review
Vaccines
vaccines
vaccine hesitancy
immunization
public health
health behavior
public opinion
author_facet Cheryl Lin
Pikuei Tu
Leslie M. Beitsch
author_sort Cheryl Lin
title Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic Review
title_short Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic Review
title_full Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic Review
title_fullStr Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic Review
title_sort confidence and receptivity for covid-19 vaccines: a rapid systematic review
publisher MDPI AG
series Vaccines
issn 2076-393X
publishDate 2021-12-01
description While COVID-19 continues raging worldwide, effective vaccines are highly anticipated. However, vaccine hesitancy is widespread. Survey results on uptake intentions vary and continue to change. This review compared trends and synthesized findings in vaccination receptivity over time across US and international polls, assessing survey design influences and evaluating context to inform policies and practices. Data sources included academic literature (PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO following PRISMA guidelines), news and official reports published by 20 October 2020. Two researchers independently screened potential peer-reviewed articles and syndicated polls for eligibility; 126 studies and surveys were selected. Declining vaccine acceptance (from >70% in March to <50% in October) with demographic, socioeconomic, and partisan divides was observed. Perceived risk, concerns over vaccine safety and effectiveness, doctors’ recommendations, and inoculation history were common factors. Impacts of regional infection rates, gender, and personal COVID-19 experience were inconclusive. Unique COVID-19 factors included political party orientation, doubts toward expedited development/approval process, and perceived political interference. Many receptive participants preferred to wait until others have taken the vaccine; mandates could increase resistance. Survey wording and answer options showed influence on responses. To achieve herd immunity, communication campaigns are immediately needed, focusing on transparency and restoring trust in health authorities.
topic vaccines
vaccine hesitancy
immunization
public health
health behavior
public opinion
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/1/16
work_keys_str_mv AT cheryllin confidenceandreceptivityforcovid19vaccinesarapidsystematicreview
AT pikueitu confidenceandreceptivityforcovid19vaccinesarapidsystematicreview
AT lesliembeitsch confidenceandreceptivityforcovid19vaccinesarapidsystematicreview
_version_ 1724365430374531072