Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic Review
While COVID-19 continues raging worldwide, effective vaccines are highly anticipated. However, vaccine hesitancy is widespread. Survey results on uptake intentions vary and continue to change. This review compared trends and synthesized findings in vaccination receptivity over time across US and int...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-12-01
|
Series: | Vaccines |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/1/16 |
id |
doaj-5e11b05d94ae45ed9b5cdccff60b5339 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5e11b05d94ae45ed9b5cdccff60b53392020-12-31T00:04:08ZengMDPI AGVaccines2076-393X2021-12-019161610.3390/vaccines9010016Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic ReviewCheryl Lin0Pikuei Tu1Leslie M. Beitsch2Policy and Organizational Management Program, Duke University, 2204 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27705, USAPolicy and Organizational Management Program, Duke University, 2204 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27705, USADepartment of Behavioral Sciences and Social Medicine, Florida State University College of Medicine, 1115 W. Call St, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USAWhile COVID-19 continues raging worldwide, effective vaccines are highly anticipated. However, vaccine hesitancy is widespread. Survey results on uptake intentions vary and continue to change. This review compared trends and synthesized findings in vaccination receptivity over time across US and international polls, assessing survey design influences and evaluating context to inform policies and practices. Data sources included academic literature (PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO following PRISMA guidelines), news and official reports published by 20 October 2020. Two researchers independently screened potential peer-reviewed articles and syndicated polls for eligibility; 126 studies and surveys were selected. Declining vaccine acceptance (from >70% in March to <50% in October) with demographic, socioeconomic, and partisan divides was observed. Perceived risk, concerns over vaccine safety and effectiveness, doctors’ recommendations, and inoculation history were common factors. Impacts of regional infection rates, gender, and personal COVID-19 experience were inconclusive. Unique COVID-19 factors included political party orientation, doubts toward expedited development/approval process, and perceived political interference. Many receptive participants preferred to wait until others have taken the vaccine; mandates could increase resistance. Survey wording and answer options showed influence on responses. To achieve herd immunity, communication campaigns are immediately needed, focusing on transparency and restoring trust in health authorities.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/1/16vaccinesvaccine hesitancyimmunizationpublic healthhealth behaviorpublic opinion |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Cheryl Lin Pikuei Tu Leslie M. Beitsch |
spellingShingle |
Cheryl Lin Pikuei Tu Leslie M. Beitsch Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic Review Vaccines vaccines vaccine hesitancy immunization public health health behavior public opinion |
author_facet |
Cheryl Lin Pikuei Tu Leslie M. Beitsch |
author_sort |
Cheryl Lin |
title |
Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic Review |
title_short |
Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic Review |
title_full |
Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic Review |
title_fullStr |
Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Confidence and Receptivity for COVID-19 Vaccines: A Rapid Systematic Review |
title_sort |
confidence and receptivity for covid-19 vaccines: a rapid systematic review |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Vaccines |
issn |
2076-393X |
publishDate |
2021-12-01 |
description |
While COVID-19 continues raging worldwide, effective vaccines are highly anticipated. However, vaccine hesitancy is widespread. Survey results on uptake intentions vary and continue to change. This review compared trends and synthesized findings in vaccination receptivity over time across US and international polls, assessing survey design influences and evaluating context to inform policies and practices. Data sources included academic literature (PubMed, Embase, and PsycINFO following PRISMA guidelines), news and official reports published by 20 October 2020. Two researchers independently screened potential peer-reviewed articles and syndicated polls for eligibility; 126 studies and surveys were selected. Declining vaccine acceptance (from >70% in March to <50% in October) with demographic, socioeconomic, and partisan divides was observed. Perceived risk, concerns over vaccine safety and effectiveness, doctors’ recommendations, and inoculation history were common factors. Impacts of regional infection rates, gender, and personal COVID-19 experience were inconclusive. Unique COVID-19 factors included political party orientation, doubts toward expedited development/approval process, and perceived political interference. Many receptive participants preferred to wait until others have taken the vaccine; mandates could increase resistance. Survey wording and answer options showed influence on responses. To achieve herd immunity, communication campaigns are immediately needed, focusing on transparency and restoring trust in health authorities. |
topic |
vaccines vaccine hesitancy immunization public health health behavior public opinion |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/1/16 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT cheryllin confidenceandreceptivityforcovid19vaccinesarapidsystematicreview AT pikueitu confidenceandreceptivityforcovid19vaccinesarapidsystematicreview AT lesliembeitsch confidenceandreceptivityforcovid19vaccinesarapidsystematicreview |
_version_ |
1724365430374531072 |