Differences in healthcare expenditure estimates according to statistical approach: A nationwide claims database study on patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

AIM:Disease-associated healthcare expenditures are generally calculated using matched comparisons or regression-based analyses, but little is known about their differences in estimates. This aim of this study was to compare the differences between disease-associated healthcare expenditures estimated...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haruhisa Fukuda, Daisuke Sato, Kensuke Moriwaki, Haku Ishida
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237316
id doaj-5e07b7c4db86424b83d20149f17cd705
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5e07b7c4db86424b83d20149f17cd7052021-03-03T22:01:00ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01158e023731610.1371/journal.pone.0237316Differences in healthcare expenditure estimates according to statistical approach: A nationwide claims database study on patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.Haruhisa FukudaDaisuke SatoKensuke MoriwakiHaku IshidaAIM:Disease-associated healthcare expenditures are generally calculated using matched comparisons or regression-based analyses, but little is known about their differences in estimates. This aim of this study was to compare the differences between disease-associated healthcare expenditures estimated using these 2 methods. METHODS:In this retrospective cohort study, a matched comparison was first conducted by matching cases with controls using sex, age, and comorbidities to estimate disease-associated expenditures. The cases were then used in a fixed-effects analysis that compared expenditures before and after disease occurrence. The subjects were adults (≥20 years) with primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent treatment (including surgical resection, locoregional therapy, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, and transarterial embolization) at a Japanese hospital between April 2010 and March 2018. We calculated the total healthcare expenditures per patient per month according to treatment and disease phase (initial, continuing, and terminal). RESULTS:There were 14,923 cases in the initial/continuing phases and 15,968 cases in the terminal phase. In the initial/continuing phases, 3,552 patients underwent surgical resection only, with HCC-associated expenditures of $5,555 according to the matched comparison and $5,889 according to the fixed-effects analysis (proportional difference: 94.3%). The initial phase expenditures were approximately 9% higher in the fixed-effects analysis, whereas the continuing phase expenditures were approximately 7% higher in the matched comparison. The expenditures in the terminal phase were 93.1% higher in the fixed-effects analysis. CONCLUSIONS:The 2 methods produced similar estimates of HCC-associated healthcare expenditures in the initial/continuing phases. However, terminal phase expenditures were substantially different between the methods.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237316
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Haruhisa Fukuda
Daisuke Sato
Kensuke Moriwaki
Haku Ishida
spellingShingle Haruhisa Fukuda
Daisuke Sato
Kensuke Moriwaki
Haku Ishida
Differences in healthcare expenditure estimates according to statistical approach: A nationwide claims database study on patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Haruhisa Fukuda
Daisuke Sato
Kensuke Moriwaki
Haku Ishida
author_sort Haruhisa Fukuda
title Differences in healthcare expenditure estimates according to statistical approach: A nationwide claims database study on patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
title_short Differences in healthcare expenditure estimates according to statistical approach: A nationwide claims database study on patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
title_full Differences in healthcare expenditure estimates according to statistical approach: A nationwide claims database study on patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
title_fullStr Differences in healthcare expenditure estimates according to statistical approach: A nationwide claims database study on patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
title_full_unstemmed Differences in healthcare expenditure estimates according to statistical approach: A nationwide claims database study on patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
title_sort differences in healthcare expenditure estimates according to statistical approach: a nationwide claims database study on patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description AIM:Disease-associated healthcare expenditures are generally calculated using matched comparisons or regression-based analyses, but little is known about their differences in estimates. This aim of this study was to compare the differences between disease-associated healthcare expenditures estimated using these 2 methods. METHODS:In this retrospective cohort study, a matched comparison was first conducted by matching cases with controls using sex, age, and comorbidities to estimate disease-associated expenditures. The cases were then used in a fixed-effects analysis that compared expenditures before and after disease occurrence. The subjects were adults (≥20 years) with primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent treatment (including surgical resection, locoregional therapy, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, and transarterial embolization) at a Japanese hospital between April 2010 and March 2018. We calculated the total healthcare expenditures per patient per month according to treatment and disease phase (initial, continuing, and terminal). RESULTS:There were 14,923 cases in the initial/continuing phases and 15,968 cases in the terminal phase. In the initial/continuing phases, 3,552 patients underwent surgical resection only, with HCC-associated expenditures of $5,555 according to the matched comparison and $5,889 according to the fixed-effects analysis (proportional difference: 94.3%). The initial phase expenditures were approximately 9% higher in the fixed-effects analysis, whereas the continuing phase expenditures were approximately 7% higher in the matched comparison. The expenditures in the terminal phase were 93.1% higher in the fixed-effects analysis. CONCLUSIONS:The 2 methods produced similar estimates of HCC-associated healthcare expenditures in the initial/continuing phases. However, terminal phase expenditures were substantially different between the methods.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237316
work_keys_str_mv AT haruhisafukuda differencesinhealthcareexpenditureestimatesaccordingtostatisticalapproachanationwideclaimsdatabasestudyonpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT daisukesato differencesinhealthcareexpenditureestimatesaccordingtostatisticalapproachanationwideclaimsdatabasestudyonpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT kensukemoriwaki differencesinhealthcareexpenditureestimatesaccordingtostatisticalapproachanationwideclaimsdatabasestudyonpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT hakuishida differencesinhealthcareexpenditureestimatesaccordingtostatisticalapproachanationwideclaimsdatabasestudyonpatientswithhepatocellularcarcinoma
_version_ 1714813820639117312