Reckoning with Denial and Complicity: Child Sexual Abuse and the Case of Cardinal George Pell
This article is concerned with public responses to allegations of child sexual abuse by representatives of powerful state-like entities such as the Catholic Church. It focuses on the responses of hegemonic groups and individuals to the recent trials and acquittal of the most senior Catholic figure e...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Queensland University of Technology
2020-11-01
|
Series: | International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/view/1688 |
id |
doaj-5e004e8bce974fc99d9085669b2699d4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-5e004e8bce974fc99d9085669b2699d42021-06-02T13:42:18ZengQueensland University of TechnologyInternational Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy2202-79982202-80052020-11-0194314410.5204/ijcjsd.16881688Reckoning with Denial and Complicity: Child Sexual Abuse and the Case of Cardinal George PellKate Gleeson0Macquarie UniversityThis article is concerned with public responses to allegations of child sexual abuse by representatives of powerful state-like entities such as the Catholic Church. It focuses on the responses of hegemonic groups and individuals to the recent trials and acquittal of the most senior Catholic figure ever to face child sexual abuse charges, Australian Cardinal George Pell, and his sworn testimony denying knowledge of sex crimes committed by a priest he associated with in the past. The article examines organised political campaigns denying the possibility of child sexual abuse in relation to a more generalised cultural denial permeating society about the entrenched nature of child abuse. As a means for coming to terms with the denial of atrocities, this article invokes philosophical debates about responsibility for mass crimes in the context of war tribunals, such as those formulated by Simone de Beauvoir and Hannah Arendt.https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/view/1688child sexual abusedenialcomplicitycatholic churchinstitutional abuse |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kate Gleeson |
spellingShingle |
Kate Gleeson Reckoning with Denial and Complicity: Child Sexual Abuse and the Case of Cardinal George Pell International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy child sexual abuse denial complicity catholic church institutional abuse |
author_facet |
Kate Gleeson |
author_sort |
Kate Gleeson |
title |
Reckoning with Denial and Complicity: Child Sexual Abuse and the Case of Cardinal George Pell |
title_short |
Reckoning with Denial and Complicity: Child Sexual Abuse and the Case of Cardinal George Pell |
title_full |
Reckoning with Denial and Complicity: Child Sexual Abuse and the Case of Cardinal George Pell |
title_fullStr |
Reckoning with Denial and Complicity: Child Sexual Abuse and the Case of Cardinal George Pell |
title_full_unstemmed |
Reckoning with Denial and Complicity: Child Sexual Abuse and the Case of Cardinal George Pell |
title_sort |
reckoning with denial and complicity: child sexual abuse and the case of cardinal george pell |
publisher |
Queensland University of Technology |
series |
International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy |
issn |
2202-7998 2202-8005 |
publishDate |
2020-11-01 |
description |
This article is concerned with public responses to allegations of child sexual abuse by representatives of powerful state-like entities such as the Catholic Church. It focuses on the responses of hegemonic groups and individuals to the recent trials and acquittal of the most senior Catholic figure ever to face child sexual abuse charges, Australian Cardinal George Pell, and his sworn testimony denying knowledge of sex crimes committed by a priest he associated with in the past. The article examines organised political campaigns denying the possibility of child sexual abuse in relation to a more generalised cultural denial permeating society about the entrenched nature of child abuse. As a means for coming to terms with the denial of atrocities, this article invokes philosophical debates about responsibility for mass crimes in the context of war tribunals, such as those formulated by Simone de Beauvoir and Hannah Arendt. |
topic |
child sexual abuse denial complicity catholic church institutional abuse |
url |
https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/view/1688 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kategleeson reckoningwithdenialandcomplicitychildsexualabuseandthecaseofcardinalgeorgepell |
_version_ |
1721403842269020160 |