Evaluation of sugarcane laboratory ensiling and analysis techniques

The objective was to evaluate the effects of laboratory-silo type and method of silage extract production, respectively, on sugarcane silage fermentation and recovery of fermentation products. Sugarcane was mechanically harvested and ensiled in three different types of laboratory silos (five replica...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: André de Faria Pedroso, Alexandre Mendonça Pedroso, Waldomiro Barioni Júnior, Gilberto Batista de Souza
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia 2014-04-01
Series:Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982014000400169&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-5dee629bb9834cf1953e35d5e2e3bafe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-5dee629bb9834cf1953e35d5e2e3bafe2020-11-24T22:52:03ZengSociedade Brasileira de ZootecniaRevista Brasileira de Zootecnia1806-92902014-04-0143416917410.1590/S1516-35982014000400002S1516-35982014000400169Evaluation of sugarcane laboratory ensiling and analysis techniquesAndré de Faria PedrosoAlexandre Mendonça PedrosoWaldomiro Barioni JúniorGilberto Batista de SouzaThe objective was to evaluate the effects of laboratory-silo type and method of silage extract production, respectively, on sugarcane silage fermentation and recovery of fermentation products. Sugarcane was mechanically harvested and ensiled in three different types of laboratory silos (five replicates): 9.7 × 30 cm PVC tubes with tight lids, equipped or unequipped with Bunsen valves, and 20 L plastic buckets with tight lids and Bunsen valves. Three methods were used to produce silage extracts for pH, ethanol, acetic and lactic acids determination: extraction of silage juice by a hydraulic press and production of water extracts using a stomacher or a blender. Total dry matter loss (231 g/kg DM) was not affected by silo type. No interactions between silo type and method of silage extract production were observed for ethanol and organic acids contents in the silages. Interaction between silo type and method of silage extract preparation was detected for pH. Silo type affected ethanol content but did not affect lactic and acetic acids concentration in the silages. Dry matter, crude protein, neutral detergent fiber and ash were not affected by silo type. The method used to produce silage extracts affected the recovery of all fermentation products analyzed in the silages. Recovery of ethanol and acetic acid was higher when silage extracts were produced using a blender. For lactic acid recovery, the hydraulic press method was superior to the other two methods. Silage fermentation pattern is not affected by silo type, but the method used to produce silage extracts and some characteristics of silos affect the recovery of volatile fermentation products.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982014000400169&lng=en&tlng=enacetic acidethanollaboratory silolactic acidsilage extractsugarcane silage
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author André de Faria Pedroso
Alexandre Mendonça Pedroso
Waldomiro Barioni Júnior
Gilberto Batista de Souza
spellingShingle André de Faria Pedroso
Alexandre Mendonça Pedroso
Waldomiro Barioni Júnior
Gilberto Batista de Souza
Evaluation of sugarcane laboratory ensiling and analysis techniques
Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
acetic acid
ethanol
laboratory silo
lactic acid
silage extract
sugarcane silage
author_facet André de Faria Pedroso
Alexandre Mendonça Pedroso
Waldomiro Barioni Júnior
Gilberto Batista de Souza
author_sort André de Faria Pedroso
title Evaluation of sugarcane laboratory ensiling and analysis techniques
title_short Evaluation of sugarcane laboratory ensiling and analysis techniques
title_full Evaluation of sugarcane laboratory ensiling and analysis techniques
title_fullStr Evaluation of sugarcane laboratory ensiling and analysis techniques
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of sugarcane laboratory ensiling and analysis techniques
title_sort evaluation of sugarcane laboratory ensiling and analysis techniques
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia
series Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia
issn 1806-9290
publishDate 2014-04-01
description The objective was to evaluate the effects of laboratory-silo type and method of silage extract production, respectively, on sugarcane silage fermentation and recovery of fermentation products. Sugarcane was mechanically harvested and ensiled in three different types of laboratory silos (five replicates): 9.7 × 30 cm PVC tubes with tight lids, equipped or unequipped with Bunsen valves, and 20 L plastic buckets with tight lids and Bunsen valves. Three methods were used to produce silage extracts for pH, ethanol, acetic and lactic acids determination: extraction of silage juice by a hydraulic press and production of water extracts using a stomacher or a blender. Total dry matter loss (231 g/kg DM) was not affected by silo type. No interactions between silo type and method of silage extract production were observed for ethanol and organic acids contents in the silages. Interaction between silo type and method of silage extract preparation was detected for pH. Silo type affected ethanol content but did not affect lactic and acetic acids concentration in the silages. Dry matter, crude protein, neutral detergent fiber and ash were not affected by silo type. The method used to produce silage extracts affected the recovery of all fermentation products analyzed in the silages. Recovery of ethanol and acetic acid was higher when silage extracts were produced using a blender. For lactic acid recovery, the hydraulic press method was superior to the other two methods. Silage fermentation pattern is not affected by silo type, but the method used to produce silage extracts and some characteristics of silos affect the recovery of volatile fermentation products.
topic acetic acid
ethanol
laboratory silo
lactic acid
silage extract
sugarcane silage
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-35982014000400169&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT andredefariapedroso evaluationofsugarcanelaboratoryensilingandanalysistechniques
AT alexandremendoncapedroso evaluationofsugarcanelaboratoryensilingandanalysistechniques
AT waldomirobarionijunior evaluationofsugarcanelaboratoryensilingandanalysistechniques
AT gilbertobatistadesouza evaluationofsugarcanelaboratoryensilingandanalysistechniques
_version_ 1725667359972130816